...@webmink.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 13:51
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Quick Office Pro
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote
@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Quick Office Pro
My 2 cents as forum moderator.
We agreed on the forum to reject spam only. Therefore, we do not filter such
question when they come (but they are rather rare).
In such case we move them to the General discussion section with the
appropriate
On 02/12/2014 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
let's make it a project decision and not an
individual decision. I'll take this to the dev list now and, subject to
lazy consensus, in three days you will be able to reject Quick Office
Pro messages with backing from the project.
Update: we have consensus;
I'm not a moderator on this list, however I have some experience
from running moderating other busy mailing lists for a long
time. So I'm putting this forward just as a suggestion, which I
have found to work perfectly in similar situations - hope this
is OK.
The idea of preparing a standard
On Dec 3, 2014, at 03:52, mt m...@lockedbags.org wrote:
For these reasons, we are unable to make our forums/mailing lists available
to support other software products, including [Quick Office Pro or whatever],
which are sold and distributed by commercial entities as profit-making
On 03/12/14 08:52, mt wrote:
The idea of preparing a standard response to common posts that might
create confusion/disruption on list is a very good one.
+1
For these reasons, we are unable to make our forums/mailing lists
available to support other software products, including [Quick
Des O'Shaughnessy wrote:
I have a quick Office pro app
That app claims to come from OpenOffice, but this is not true. It is
totally unrelated to the OpenOffice project http://openoffice.org ;
please report the app to the App Store. And of course we can't help you
since this mailing list is
MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one with a
message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
should contact their supplier. I suggest other moderators adopt the same
approach.
S.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Andrea Pescetti
Simon Phipps wrote:
MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one with a
message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
should contact their supplier. I suggest other moderators adopt the same
approach.
S.
-1
We are MODERATORS, not the list
Exactly. That's why Simon is providing info that OO/ Apache is not related
to
Quick Office; explaining that this group can't help re QO, and directing
the person making inquiry to a possible source for help since that help
can't be obtained here.
I can't think of a better function for a
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one
with a
message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
should contact their supplier. I suggest other
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one
with a
message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
should contact their supplier. I
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one
with a
message stating that QuickOffice is
in
this instance.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Simon Phipps [mailto:si...@webmink.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 13:51
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Quick Office Pro
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Tue, Dec
Correcting (1-2)
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 14:42
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Quick Office Pro
I support what Simon proposes to do for the following reasons:
1. We are talking about
On 09/22/2014 04:26 AM, T wrote:
Not sure what a binary is. I just had thought if I got the app again,
my files might come back with it? Just a reach I guess. I wasn't
really sure how that worked. Is that even possible?
As others have already mentioned, that app is bogus and you should
report
T wrote:
Hello, My iPad crashed a few weeks ago, and I had Quick office pro. I
tried to buy the app, the 2.99 one, but it is 4 pages of how to use.
Is there something I can buy to replace, and get those files back?
Tabitha
This mailing list is for the Apache OpenOffice project:
On 09/22/2014 07:26 AM, T wrote:
Not sure what a binary is. I just had thought if I got the app again, my
files might come back with it? Just a reach I guess. I wasn't really sure how
that worked. Is that even possible?
Your files should not have disappeared. They should still be there.
On 09/22/2014 05:26 AM, T wrote:
Not sure what a binary is. I just had thought if I got the app again, my files
might come back with it? Just a reach I guess. I wasn't really sure how that
worked. Is that even possible?
Terribly sorry for your loss, but you do not seem to have any idea what
On 09/21/2014 03:57 PM, T wrote:
Hello,
My iPad crashed a few weeks ago, and I had Quick office pro. I tried to buy the
app, the 2.99 one, but it is 4 pages of how to use. Is there something I can
buy to replace, and get those files back?
Tabitha
20 matches
Mail list logo
