Des O'Shaughnessy wrote:
I have a quick Office pro app
That app claims to come from OpenOffice, but this is not true. It is
totally unrelated to the OpenOffice project http://openoffice.org ;
please report the app to the App Store. And of course we can't help you
since this mailing list is
MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one with a
message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
should contact their supplier. I suggest other moderators adopt the same
approach.
S.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Andrea Pescetti
I was thinking of downloading your program but do not see that it supports
Apple Yosemite 10.10.1. Can this program still be installed and functional?
Thanks,
Jack Orcutt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Simon Phipps wrote:
MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one with a
message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
should contact their supplier. I suggest other moderators adopt the same
approach.
S.
-1
We are MODERATORS, not the list
Exactly. That's why Simon is providing info that OO/ Apache is not related
to
Quick Office; explaining that this group can't help re QO, and directing
the person making inquiry to a possible source for help since that help
can't be obtained here.
I can't think of a better function for a
I am on Yosemite and have been using 4.1.0 just fine. I am very lazy but I
finally downloaded 4.1.1 this morning. All seems well so far. That Magic Mouse
problem seems fixed which is lovely. Cheers to the Apache developers!
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 2, 2014, at 9:37 AM, Jack Orcutt
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one
with a
message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
should contact their supplier. I suggest other
Forwarding Chuck's answer below; and Jack, can you tell us where you
expected to read this information? Did you consult some outdated web
page that we should update? Andrea
chuck ef wrote:
I am on Yosemite and have been using 4.1.0 just fine. I am very lazy
but I finally downloaded 4.1.1 this
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one
with a
message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
should contact their supplier. I
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one
with a
message stating that QuickOffice is
greets!
I get with increasing frequency docx files which cause OO to crash. I
end up having to open them via google-docs and then save as odt.
I'm on Apache OO 4.0.0 using Debian Wheezy with a variant of KDE3
(Trinity Desktop). I always open by using the 'File' menu tab.
I don't recall if
OO 4.1.1 it solved issues with docx files I have no idea if it solved
your problem, but I suggest to try this first.
On 3-12-2014 8:59, Felmon Davis wrote:
greets!
I get with increasing frequency docx files which cause OO to crash. I
end up having to open them via google-docs and then save
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Martin Groenescheij wrote:
OO 4.1.1 it solved issues with docx files I have no idea if it solved your
problem, but I suggest to try this first.
makes sense though I'm a bit scared to tear too much up right now.
I'll look for some instructions on installing them
I support what Simon proposes to do for the following reasons:
1. We are talking about posts to users #oo.a.o from non-subscribers, so they
have to be moderated *somehow.*
2. There has never been, in my recollection, any occasion where one of those
posts that has not been met by a response
Correcting (1-2)
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 14:42
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Quick Office Pro
I support what Simon proposes to do for the following reasons:
1. We are talking about
15 matches
Mail list logo
