On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 08:46:10PM -0700, John Boyle wrote:
Robert Holtzman wrote:
Hate to burst *your* bubble pal, but having used various Linux distros for
the last 10 yrs or so I have yet to have an upgrade break hardware
compatibility.
The only hardware that may not be supported is
Robert Holtzman wrote:
...
Without further details, and though it is theoretically possible, I'm
skeptical of his claims. If I have myself encountered upgrades that
broke hardware compatibility, then it has not been in recent memory.
Second, the individual you refer to in the computer club
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 20:31, Mark Miller wrote:
That said, I will still switch if/when they develop/make available the
drivers I need. A reasonably experienced PC person can switch to Linux, or
one of its many flavors, successfully with some effort. But this user can
not switch
Fred A. Miller wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Twayne wrote:
's funny. Your data is very misleading. Linux:
-- Has a steep learning curve
Tell that to my friend, who I loaned my Eee PC to. She took to it right
away, without any instruction whatsoever.
-- Uses
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 03:21:21PM -0700, John Boyle wrote:
Fred A. Miller wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Twayne wrote:
's funny. Your data is very misleading. Linux:
-- Has a steep learning curve
Tell that to my friend, who I loaned my Eee PC to. She took to it
Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 03:21:21PM -0700, John Boyle wrote:
Fred A. Miller wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Twayne wrote:
's funny. Your data is very misleading. Linux:
-- Has a steep learning curve
Tell that to
John Boyle wrote:
Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 03:21:21PM -0700, John Boyle wrote:
Fred A. Miller wrote:
James Knott wrote:
Twayne wrote:
's funny. Your data is very misleading. Linux:
-- Has a steep learning curve
Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:200909152101.06467.gene.hesk...@gmail.com
...
's funny. Your sig is an advert for Norton...
Q: I wonder why Norton doesn't make a security product for linux?
A: Because linux generally doesn't need it. Its many times more
secure
Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:200909152210.13094.gene.hesk...@gmail.com
On Tuesday 15 September 2009, James Knott wrote:
...
AFAIK, it is only for windows. And there are no computers running
windows of any kind at this site.
I don't beleve that for a second, even
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Twayne wrote:
Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:200909152210.13094.gene.hesk...@gmail.com
On Tuesday 15 September 2009, James Knott wrote:
...
AFAIK, it is only for windows. And there are no computers running
windows of any kind at
Twayne wrote:
's funny. Your data is very misleading. Linux:
-- Has a steep learning curve
Tell that to my friend, who I loaned my Eee PC to. She took to it right
away, without any instruction whatsoever.
-- Uses non-intuitive program names as a rule
Are you referring to command
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Twayne t...@twaynesdomain.com wrote:
Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:200909152101.06467.gene.hesk...@gmail.comnews%3a200909152101.06467.gene.hesk...@gmail.com
...
's funny. Your sig is an advert for Norton...
Q: I wonder why
James Knott wrote:
Twayne wrote:
's funny. Your data is very misleading. Linux:
-- Has a steep learning curve
Tell that to my friend, who I loaned my Eee PC to. She took to it right
away, without any instruction whatsoever.
-- Uses non-intuitive program names as a rule
Are you
13 matches
Mail list logo
