On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:10:53 -0400, Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I see the following when running sa-update with debug flags:
[20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; it is recommended
that you configure trusted_networks manually
However:
# grep trusted
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:10:53 -0400, Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I see the following when running sa-update with debug flags:
[20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; it is recommended
that you configure trusted_networks manually
However:
#
Nigel Frankcom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:10:53 -0400, Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I see the following when running sa-update with debug flags:
[20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; it is recommended
that you configure trusted_networks
On 21/06/2008 1:10 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
I see the following when running sa-update with debug flags:
[20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; it is recommended
that you configure trusted_networks manually
This is expected and intentional. Your local cf files are not used
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jo Rhett schrieb:
| Why not allow me to say I trust everything from this host no matter
what?
Why would you run the mails through SpamAssassin if you trust everything
from that host? A whitelist entry in the MTA would avoid wasting
resources on
On 21/06/2008 1:10 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
I see the following when running sa-update with debug
flags:
[20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured;
it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks
manually
This is expected and intentional. Your local cf files
are
On Sat, June 21, 2008 20:05, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Should? What good is that lint anyway if it can't be used to test local rules?
spamassassin 21 -D --lint | less
does it confirm ?
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On 21/06/2008 2:05 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 21/06/2008 1:10 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
I see the following when running sa-update with debug
flags:
[20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured;
it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks
manually
This is expected
Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/06/2008 1:10 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
I see the following when running sa-update with debug flags:
[20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; it is recommended
that you configure trusted_networks manually
This is expected
Does anyone think that
10 FM_BIG_REASON Lot's of CAP words, BIG, REASON, BEST
Is scored high or?
- rh
Robert - elists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone think that
10 FM_BIG_REASON Lot's of CAP words, BIG, REASON, BEST
Is scored high or?
Seems high to me, but needs to be put in the context of your threshold.
--
Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seems high to me, but needs to be put in the context of your threshold.
--
Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Threshold?
Huh?
You are joking right?
The default SA scoring spam tagging threshold is half that...
:-)
- rh
Robert - elists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Threshold?
Yes, threshold.
Huh?
What is so confusing?
You are joking right?
No.
The default SA scoring spam tagging threshold is half that...
Exactly. That is why I said it does seem high (in this case, assuming the
default threshold of
On 21/06/2008 10:45 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/06/2008 1:10 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
I see the following when running sa-update with debug flags:
[20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; it is recommended
that you configure
14 matches
Mail list logo