On 17.12.08 15:00, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
I think because it is not binary code, it is slower and use more memory,
just that.
I think that sa-compile could help you with that (and even with speed of
processing rules)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ;
On 17.12.08 20:04, Marcin Krol wrote:
I'm trying to get Razor2 configured, I get this in spamassassin -D
--lint output:
[...]
I can't get this module installed into Perl. How do I do that?
what OS/distribution do you use? Most of those known to me have way to
install RAZOR
--
Matus UHLAR -
Matt Kettler wrote:
ie: it's not law that all perl code in the universe be in CPAN.
Well, it absolutely *should* be the law of the universe. Wasn't it so
since Big Bang? :-)
Regards,
Marcin Krol
All,
I know this question has been asked a few times before however I can't
seem to get anything to work using the answers before.
I am running the following Ubuntu server 8.04, postfix server 2.5.1,
dovecot (lda) 1.0.10 and spamassassin 3.2.4 perl 5.8.8
It's configured to use virtual
Hello everyone,
Is it just me or iXhash all of a sudden causes problems? I got very high
load and memory consumption on multiple spamd instances hanging there
and just consuming CPU. When I turned iXhash off, the mailserver got
back to normal.
perl: v5.8.8
SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
I'm
David Lomax ha scritto:
All,
I know this question has been asked a few times before however I can't
seem to get anything to work using the answers before.
I am running the following Ubuntu server 8.04, postfix server 2.5.1,
dovecot (lda) 1.0.10 and spamassassin 3.2.4 perl 5.8.8
It's
If you want to unsubscribe, follow what the headers say:
list-unsubscribe: mailto:users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org
PS: I know of no lists where you e-mail a COMMAND to the entire list.
Doesn't work that way.
kchri...@hambrosalle.dk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: u...@3.am [mailto:u...@3.am]
Sent: 2008-12-17 23:16
To: SA Mailing list
Subject: Re: remove SURBL rules
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, LuKreme wrote:
On 16-Dec-2008, at 23:57, ram wrote:
http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html
I did the 'request a
LuKreme wrote:
On 16-Dec-2008, at 23:57, ram wrote:
http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html
I did the 'request a quote'. For 3,000 users and 550,000 emails a day
(hey, i was just making up numbers here) the cost is US$600/year. If
you're a non-profit it's $500/year.
Considering that
Hello everyone,
When I run sa-update -D --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel
sought.rules.yerp.org, it damages my SA installation!
After the update, I get:
orchidea 192.168.1.1 ~/tmp % spamassassin --lint
[15235] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule URIBL_SBL
[15235] warn: config:
From: Marcin Krol mrk...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:37:12 +0100
Hello everyone,
When I run sa-update -D --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel
sought.rules.yerp.org, it damages my SA installation!
sa-update puts rules in /var/lib/spamassassin/VER Once this directory
Jeff Mincy wrote:
sa-update puts rules in /var/lib/spamassassin/VER Once this directory
exists all site rules are expected to come from this directory.
I found out that...
The
previous installation directory (eg /usr/local/share/spamassassin) is
ignored.
..but not that. Now it makes
On 18/12/2008 1:00 PM, Marcin Krol wrote:
Jeff Mincy wrote:
Try doing sa-update of the normal rules before you use sa-update of
additional rule sets.
Hmm, how do I do that? sa-update -–channel updates.spamassassin.org ?
Sure, or just run sa-update without a channel parameter or so create a
Marcin Krol wrote on Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:00:55 +0100:
Hmm, how do I do that? sa-update -channel updates.spamassassin.org ?
just sa-update. If you want to add other channels you either do it like
Daryl explains in the link below or one by one.
Is there a way to *sensibly* combine JM's
On Thursday 18 December 2008, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Marcin Krol wrote on Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:00:55 +0100:
Hmm, how do I do that? sa-update -channel updates.spamassassin.org ?
just sa-update. If you want to add other channels you either do it like
Daryl explains in the link below or one by one.
Gene Heskett wrote on Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:13:28 -0500:
Following the above tut, step 2 fails as root owns the /etc/mail tree, and
the
user running SA has no perms. What should the owner/group actually be for
that? I changed it to $user:mail and that seemed to fix it.
I assume your are
Hi all
I have a question... I have configured a mail server with Postfix
+spamassassin+amavis. The server is working very good and blocking
well. I have installed another server... with the same procedure... and
I have the same rules, configuration files...
I mean, everything is
Luis Croker wrote:
I have a question... I have configured a mail server with
Postfix+spamassassin+amavis. The server is working very good and
blocking well. I have installed another server... with the same
procedure... and I have the same rules, configuration files...
I mean, everything
I have been looking in my files... and the logs show me that the
rules BAYES_* (BAYES_00.. BAYES_99) are not doing match in the mails...
I mean... these rules are not being used...
How can i try to do Amavis uses these rules ?
Thanks.
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 15:07 -0800, Evan
FYI for anyone using ClamAV with the Sanesecurity phish/scam signatures:
Their website is being DDOSed and they've suspended updates.
Please disable attempts to download/update the sigs until they
manage to get out from under this attack.
See: http://www.sanesecurity.co.uk/
--
Dave Funk
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Luis Croker wrote:
I have been looking in my files... and the logs show me that the
rules BAYES_* (BAYES_00.. BAYES_99) are not doing match in the mails...
I mean... these rules are not being used...
Is BAYES_50 the only BAYES rule you see hitting? That means your
On Thursday 18 December 2008, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote on Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:13:28 -0500:
Following the above tut, step 2 fails as root owns the /etc/mail tree, and
the user running SA has no perms. What should the owner/group actually be
for that? I changed it to $user:mail
23 matches
Mail list logo
