From: Mathias Homann ad...@eregion.de
Sent: Sunday, 2010/January/03 23:05
Am Montag 04 Januar 2010 schrieb John Hardin:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, babydr wrote:
Hello All , My main ? is how was this (see below(*)) email being
caught by the FH_DATE_PAST_20XX . I've run the sa_update
repeatedly
Am Montag, 4. Januar 2010 08:50:54 schrieb Per Jessen:
Mathias Homann wrote:
... is a fix for that out through sa-update now?
then why am i not getting it?
my channels for sa-update:
saupdates.openprotect.com
updates.spamassassin.org
70_zmi_german.cf.zmi.sa-update.dostech.net
I
you may get this error from time to time, which is not a problem per se.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
(I realize that 3.2.5 does not grok v6 headers, and I believe this is
fixed in 3.3, so this is more of an observation than a complaint.)
Yesterday I received spam over IPv6 (and also TLS). This is the first
one I've noticed, probably due to a compromised v6-capable machine, so I
thought it
On Mon 04 Jan 2010 04:21:02 PM CET, Greg Troxel wrote
http://www.lexort.com/spam/spam-ipv6-cn.txt
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by
milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fnord.ir.bbn.com [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 03 Jan 2010
22:17:05 -0500 (EST)
you are on ipv4, any ip whitelisted or ?
--
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010, Marc Perkel wrote:
Can we call this the Y2010 bug? :)
I was just thinking back 10 years ago today wondering if there would be a
2010 related date bug.
Funny thing is, I can *remember* writing scripts for my current system that
included 2010 as a 'sanity check' (impossible
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org writes:
On Mon 04 Jan 2010 04:21:02 PM CET, Greg Troxel wrote
http://www.lexort.com/spam/spam-ipv6-cn.txt
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by
milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fnord.ir.bbn.com [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 03 Jan 2010
22:17:05 -0500 (EST)
you are on
You know, I really can't complain about the 'responsiveness' in this
situation. Under 24 hours. That's d**n good for anyone, but especially for
volunteers on a holiday! I'm seriously impressed! Big thanks to the team!
- Charles
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
I've posted the
On 04/01/2010 2:05 AM, Mathias Homann wrote:
... is a fix for that out through sa-update now?
then why am i not getting it?
my channels for sa-update:
saupdates.openprotect.com
updates.spamassassin.org
70_zmi_german.cf.zmi.sa-update.dostech.net
any hints?
saupdates.openprotect.com
On Saturday 02 January 2010, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
1) If your system is configured to use sa-update [3] run sa-update now.
An update is available that will correct the rule. No further action
is necessary (other than restarting spamd or any service that uses
SpamAssassin directly).
On 1/4/10 1:36 PM, Larry Starr wrote:
On Saturday 02 January 2010, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
My question, short of running with -D, which is a bit noisy, is there a way
to get sa-update to report the items it updates? I have found nothing
reading the Docs or the Code.
rc of 0 means it
On Monday 04 January 2010, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 1/4/10 1:36 PM, Larry Starr wrote:
On Saturday 02 January 2010, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
My question, short of running with -D, which is a bit noisy, is there a
way to get sa-update to report the items it updates? I have found
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 12:55 -0600, Larry Starr wrote:
On Monday 04 January 2010, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 1/4/10 1:36 PM, Larry Starr wrote:
On Saturday 02 January 2010, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
My question, short of running with -D, which is a bit noisy, is there a
way to get
On Dec 21, 2009, at 9:55 AM, R-Elists wrote:
do you have changes / hopes / ideas / suggestions for SA to make it better
or more better or whatever?
No. SA does (with amavisd-new) exactly what I want it to do, and does it well.
There's lots of stuff I don't use, like marking spam and keeping
Hi,
After a bit of digging I found that sa-update had, in fact, updated my system
before I read this.
sa-update had also updated my system, and amavisd was restarted.
However, the 72_active.cf in /usr/share/spamassassin somehow overrode
the updated one from /var/lib/spamassassin/.
Any idea
On Dec 21, 2009, at 9:55 AM, R-Elists wrote:
do you have changes / hopes / ideas / suggestions for SA to make it better
or more better or whatever?
The only thing I'd really like is more or less cosmetic. I would like
the ability to split rule definition statements over more than one
line.
I
Greg Troxel wrote:
Has anyone else gotten v6 spam?
When I first configured my personal mail servers with IPv6, I wrote a
parser for my Simscan logs, so I could graph v6 email statistics. Since
then (~June, 2008), I've received six blatant spam messages.
Here is the text representation of these
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Greg Troxel wrote:
Has anyone else gotten v6 spam?
When I first configured my personal mail servers with IPv6, I wrote a
parser for my Simscan logs, so I could graph v6 email statistics. Since
then (~June, 2008), I've received six blatant spam messages.
Here is
18 matches
Mail list logo
