Thanks Mark,
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 07:05:20PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
Sandro,
As an example I have a message that include a link to ow (dot) ly (/)
57lle. Querying host ow.ly.dbl.spamhaus.org clearly shows that it's s
spammer redirector.
If I feed the message to 'spamassassin
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 07:05:20PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
Sandro,
As an example I have a message that include a link to ow (dot) ly (/)
57lle. Querying host ow.ly.dbl.spamhaus.org clearly shows that it's s
spammer redirector.
If I feed the message to 'spamassassin -t' I get:
Sandro,
if can(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL::has_tflags_domains_only)
urirhssub URIBL_DBL_REDIR dbl.spamhaus.org. A 127.0.1.3
bodyURIBL_DBL_REDIR eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_DBL_REDIR')
describeURIBL_DBL_REDIR Spamhaus spammed redirector
Sandro,
if can(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL::has_tflags_domains_only)
urirhssub URIBL_DBL_REDIR dbl.spamhaus.org. A 127.0.1.3
bodyURIBL_DBL_REDIR eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_DBL_REDIR')
describeURIBL_DBL_REDIR Spamhaus spammed redirector
Hi,
I find a lot of spam that has already passed other spam-filters with
spamassassin better tuned than mine an already have a X-Spam-Flag to YES.
I tried to add a rule to match that case:
header CUSTOM_X_SPAM_FLAG X-Spam-Flag =~ /\bYES\b/i
score CUSTOM_X_SPAM_FLAG 5
But spamassassin -t
Sandro,
I find a lot of spam that has already passed other spam-filters with
spamassassin better tuned than mine an already have a X-Spam-Flag to YES.
I tried to add a rule to match that case:
header CUSTOM_X_SPAM_FLAG X-Spam-Flag =~ /\bYES\b/i
score CUSTOM_X_SPAM_FLAG 5
But
On 2011-06-09 11:46, Mark Martinec wrote:
Sandro,
I find a lot of spam that has already passed other spam-filters with
spamassassin better tuned than mine an already have a X-Spam-Flag to YES.
I tried to add a rule to match that case:
header CUSTOM_X_SPAM_FLAG X-Spam-Flag =~ /\bYES\b/i
Hi,
if can(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL::has_tflags_domains_only)
urirhssub URIBL_DBL_REDIR dbl.spamhaus.org. A 127.0.1.3
body URIBL_DBL_REDIR eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_DBL_REDIR')
describe URIBL_DBL_REDIR Spamhaus spammed redirector domain
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:46:41 +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
As a workaround, you may add some header rewrite rule to your MTA
which could rewrite a X-Spam-Flag to something else, like
X-X-Spam-Flag.
will not give invalid dkim ?
seems aol.com does not use amavisd-new, if thay did this header was
Benny,
As a workaround, you may add some header rewrite rule to your MTA
which could rewrite a X-Spam-Flag to something else, like
X-X-Spam-Flag.
will not give invalid dkim ?
No, unless the X-Spam-Flag were signed, which is unlikely.
Mark
On 06/09/2011 11:06 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Benny,
As a workaround, you may add some header rewrite rule to your MTA
which could rewrite a X-Spam-Flag to something else, like
X-X-Spam-Flag.
will not give invalid dkim ?
No, unless the X-Spam-Flag were signed, which is unlikely.
Even
On 09/06/2011 5:09 AM, Alessandro Dentella wrote:
Hi,
I find a lot of spam that has already passed other spam-filters with
spamassassin better tuned than mine an already have a X-Spam-Flag to YES.
I tried to add a rule to match that case:
header CUSTOM_X_SPAM_FLAG X-Spam-Flag =~
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:00:09 -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
header CUSTOM_X_SPAM_FLAG ALL:raw =~ /\bX-Spam-Flag: YES\b/i
aol have left out the space before YES
will test it and report back, thanks for this tip if it works :-)
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:08:08 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:00:09 -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
header CUSTOM_X_SPAM_FLAG ALL:raw =~ /\bX-Spam-Flag: YES\b/i
aol have left out the space before YES
will test it and report back, thanks for this tip if it works :-)
#
On 09/06/2011 10:26 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:08:08 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:00:09 -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
header CUSTOM_X_SPAM_FLAG ALL:raw =~ /\bX-Spam-Flag: YES\b/i
aol have left out the space before YES
will test it and report
15 matches
Mail list logo
