Re: MISSING_SUBJECT versus empty subject

2014-11-20 Thread Niamh Holding
Hello Reindl, Wednesday, November 19, 2014, 6:01:32 PM, you wrote: RH should there not be a SUBJECT_EMPTY rule header __NH_BLANK_SUB Subject =~ /^\s*$/ describe__NH_BLANK_SUB Subject is blank metaNH_EMPTY_SUB

amavis question

2014-11-20 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Don't know where better to ask this... I am running a new mailserver virtual domain environment with postfix and mysql for the virtual domain definitions. amavis-new seems to be rejecting all emails for my one domain not a sub domain of my main one. That is, my domain (as you can see from

Re: .co.at

2014-11-20 Thread Kai Schaetzl
As you learned by now co.at ist just as valid as any other TLD. There are many like that. Some have just shifted to that scheme, others are moving away from it (for instance uk is now offering raw .uk registrations which you couldn't get until last year or so). Unfortunately, there's no

Re: amavis question

2014-11-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am running a new mailserver virtual domain environment with postfix and mysql for the virtual domain definitions. amavis-new seems to be rejecting all emails for my one domain not a sub domain of my main one. That is, my domain (as you can see from my email addr) is

Re: MISSING_SUBJECT versus empty subject

2014-11-20 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 19.11.14 19:01, Reindl Harald wrote: i have here a message hitting BAYES_95, CUST_DNSWL_2, CUST_DNSWL_5, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_NONE but *not* MISSING_SUBJECT most likely because Subject: in the headers is that

Re: amavis question

2014-11-20 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Looks like I left out all the mysql stuff from amavis.conf that I had in my old server. Sigh. I now have to reconcile the differences and figure this out. On 11/20/2014 06:21 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Don't know where better to ask this... I am running a new mailserver virtual domain

Re: MISSING_SUBJECT versus empty subject

2014-11-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I remember I have asked the same some years ago. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/104646 the explanation was that the current rule detects empty subject the same as no subject at all. IIRC it was in fact the same rule as it is now: header

Not right yet - Re: amavis question

2014-11-20 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 11/20/2014 07:45 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Looks like I left out all the mysql stuff from amavis.conf that I had in my old server. Sigh. I now have to reconcile the differences and figure this out. I am now seeing in the maillog: Nov 20 08:36:20 z9m9z postfix/error[2698]: C379D620F2:

Re: amavis question

2014-11-20 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 11/20/2014 07:39 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am running a new mailserver virtual domain environment with postfix and mysql for the virtual domain definitions. amavis-new seems to be rejecting all emails for my one domain not a sub domain of my main one. That is, my

Maybe solved - Re: Not right yet - Re: amavis question

2014-11-20 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Will probably have to wait some time to ensure all is now together. On 11/20/2014 08:46 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 11/20/2014 07:45 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Looks like I left out all the mysql stuff from amavis.conf that I had in my old server. Sigh. I now have to reconcile the

could not create IO::Socket::IP socket on [127.0.0.1]:783: Address already in use

2014-11-20 Thread Thomas Schulz
I am not sure if this is a bug or a usage problem. I have been running spamd on Solaris 10 and Perl v5.8.9 for years, starting it with the command: spamd -d -c -m 18 --min-spare=1 --max-spare=4 --syslog-socket=inet I upgraded Perl to v5.20.1 and installed the current modules. When I try to start

OFF TOPIC: A cartoon spam joke.

2014-11-20 Thread Mark London
OFF TOPIC: I was amazed to see this cartoon, since so many people probably won't get the joke! http://bizarro.com/comics/november-15-2014/ - Mark

Re: OFF TOPIC: A cartoon spam joke.

2014-11-20 Thread Shane Williams
I don't think it's really a spam joke (though it works on that level as well). I think it's a commentary on children (particularly Chinese I would guess) working in sweatshops to create knock-off goods, like my nice new Rollex watch. On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Mark London wrote: OFF TOPIC: I was

Re: could not create IO::Socket::IP socket on [127.0.0.1]:783: Address already in use

2014-11-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Tom Schulz wrote: I am not sure if this is a bug or a usage problem. I have been running spamd on Solaris 10 and Perl v5.8.9 for years, starting it with the command: spamd -d -c -m 18 --min-spare=1 --max-spare=4 --syslog-socket=inet I upgraded Perl to v5.20.1 and installed the current