need_tags

2015-05-03 Thread Robert Schetterer
Hi , i try to understand this http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-SpamAssassin/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm need_tags ... Currently the only tag that needs to be explicitly requested is 'TIMING' ... the goal would be to have time stats of every rule matching in logs, without advanced debug levels on

Re: dkim invalid and 3.4.1

2015-05-03 Thread Nick Edwards
On 5/3/15, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 03.05.2015 um 05:34 schrieb Nick Edwards: Is there any reason reason=invalid (public key: not available) is declared as error to fail t_dkim_invalid yes, it hits way too often for legit, signed mail and so produces false

Re: dkim invalid and 3.4.1

2015-05-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.05.2015 um 05:34 schrieb Nick Edwards: Is there any reason reason=invalid (public key: not available) is declared as error to fail t_dkim_invalid yes, it hits way too often for legit, signed mail and so produces false positives signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

The query to URIBL was blocked

2015-05-03 Thread Chris
Seeing this in most of the markups 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block I installed Bind9 as a caching name server and AFAICT it's

interesting spammer trick (bayes)

2015-05-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Hi recently i observed by playing around with bayes-training that some junk (maybe unintentional) is using the mimetype 'application/octet-stream' instead 'text/html' containing the payload of a form with javascript prevets the attachment from tokenizing

Re: SA 3.4.1 - error messages in log?

2015-05-03 Thread Mark Martinec
On May 2, 2015 7:08:10 PM Mark Martinec wrote: May 2 06:45:29 sunshine spamd[22293]: Use of uninitialized value $hasStructureInfo in numeric eq (==) at (eval 46) line 5520. This one seems to come from a module Geo::IP, called form a SpamAssassin plugin URILocalBL. [...] Try disabling

Re: dkim invalid and 3.4.1

2015-05-03 Thread Mark Martinec
1.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid The score for this rule should be a zero or a near-zero. There must be some problem with assigning a score to such test rule (the 1.0 is a default value if a score line is missing). T_DKIM_INVALID is a test rule, as such its

Re: SA 3.4.1 - error messages in log?

2015-05-03 Thread Art Greenberg
On Sun, 3 May 2015, Mark Martinec wrote: On May 2, 2015 7:08:10 PM Mark Martinec wrote: May 2 06:45:29 sunshine spamd[22293]: Use of uninitialized value $hasStructureInfo in numeric eq (==) at (eval 46) line 5520. This one seems to come from a module Geo::IP, called form a SpamAssassin

Re: The query to URIBL was blocked

2015-05-03 Thread Adam Major
Hello Seeing this in most of the markups 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block [...] The output doesn't show any blocked DNS servers. If that's the

Re: The query to URIBL was blocked

2015-05-03 Thread Chris
On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 23:02 +0200, Adam Major wrote: Hello Seeing this in most of the markups 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block [...]

Re: dkim invalid and 3.4.1

2015-05-03 Thread Mark Martinec
On 2015-05-03 5:34, Nick Edwards wrote: Is there any reason reason=invalid (public key: not available) is declared as error to fail t_dkim_invalid 1.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid This is published a neutral so should not be considered invalid This

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.4.1 available (bug)

2015-05-03 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Did you run sa-update or install rules manually? 99% sure that is the issue. Regards, KAM On May 1, 2015 2:34:57 PM EDT, Forrest those.li...@gmail.com wrote: Upgrading from a simple 3.4.0 installation, 3.4.1 refuses to start, with this error: Starting spamd: child process [3723] exited or

Re: dkim invalid and 3.4.1

2015-05-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.05.2015 um 13:43 schrieb Nick Edwards: On 5/3/15, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 03.05.2015 um 05:34 schrieb Nick Edwards: Is there any reason reason=invalid (public key: not available) is declared as error to fail t_dkim_invalid yes, it hits way too often for