Re: Spoofed amazon order email

2021-04-16 Thread Bill Cole
On 16 Apr 2021, at 11:25, Greg Troxel wrote: > Probably not for normals, score up MPART_ALT_DIFF because nobody > should be sending mail with a text/plain part that is not semantically > equivalent to the html. It seem like a bug that this message didn't match MPART_ALT_DIFF. -- Bill

Re: Spoofed amazon order email

2021-04-16 Thread @lbutlr
On 16 Apr 2021, at 16:16, RW wrote: > On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:25:19 -0400 Greg Troxel wrote: > >> Probably not for normals, score up MPART_ALT_DIFF because nobody >> should be sending mail with a text/plain part that is not >> semantically equivalent to the html. > > Unfortunately it's quite

Re: Spoofed amazon order email

2021-04-16 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021, RW wrote: On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:25:19 -0400 Greg Troxel wrote: Probably not for normals, score up MPART_ALT_DIFF because nobody should be sending mail with a text/plain part that is not semantically equivalent to the html. Unfortunately it's quite common. +1

Re: Spoofed amazon order email

2021-04-16 Thread @lbutlr
On 16 Apr 2021, at 16:03, John Hardin wrote: > header __FROM_NAME_AMAZONCOM From:name =~ /\bamazon\.com\b/i > meta POSSIBLE_AMAZON_PHISH_01 (__FROM_NAME_AMAZONCOM && NAME_EMAIL_DIFF) > meta POSSIBLE_AMAZON_PHISH_02 (__FROM_NAME_AMAZONCOM && > !__HDR_RCVD_AMAZON) It seems

Re: Spoofed amazon order email

2021-04-16 Thread Loren Wilton
While I haven't received a forged Amazon order email in this exact form, there is all kinds of stuff here that could be caught with appropriate rules. "In-case you require any change in order or like to cancel we recommend giving us call immediately at " "In-case" is unlikely in

Re: Spoofed amazon order email

2021-04-16 Thread RW
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:25:19 -0400 Greg Troxel wrote: > Probably not for normals, score up MPART_ALT_DIFF because nobody > should be sending mail with a text/plain part that is not > semantically equivalent to the html. Unfortunately it's quite common.

Re: Spoofed amazon order email

2021-04-16 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021, Steve Dondley wrote: First, thanks to everyone on the list how has given me a hand over the past couple of weeks as I get my "sea legs" with spamassassin. It's working well for me now but I obviously still have more to learn. For one, I'm still uncertain on the best way

Re: sa-learn using multiple CPUs?

2021-04-16 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2021-04-16 03:29, John Hardin wrote: So I will re-configure my installation to use MariaDB. You should also consider the Redis backend. i dont like to see redis needs sysctl non default settings so much more power does redis not have imho one could use memory engine in mysql, and then

Re: Spoofed amazon order email

2021-04-16 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2021-04-16 17:10, Steve Dondley wrote: From: "or...@amazon.com" X-Google-Original-From: "or...@amazon.com" wow, google accept it header LOCAL_AMAZON From:Name ~= /^@amazon.com$/ header LOCAL_GMAIL From:Addr ~= /^@gmail.com$/ meta LOCAL_SPOFFED (LocAL_AMAZON && LOCAL_GMAIL) untested

Re: Spoofed amazon order email

2021-04-16 Thread Antony Stone
On Friday 16 April 2021 at 17:26:40, Dave Wreski wrote: > > And how the hell is google letting this crap flow out of its email > > service, anyway? > > Because they're in the email business, not the email security business. I would add that Google do spam filtering on *inbound* mail, because

Re: Spoofed amazon order email

2021-04-16 Thread Dave Wreski
Hi Steve, As Antony just reported, post these spamples to something like pastebin.com then provide a link so we can view the raw email. X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on This is the first issue I see - you're likely missing a lot of additional features of later

Re: Spoofed amazon order email

2021-04-16 Thread Greg Troxel
My advice realize that you can't block everything set up TXREP, including outgoing processing wait until after you have a week of TXREP data because that will improve scores of legit mail enough, for the most part, that the tweaks below and the more aggressive scores from KAM will

Re: Spoofed amazon order email

2021-04-16 Thread Antony Stone
On Friday 16 April 2021 at 17:10:14, Steve Dondley wrote: > First, thanks to everyone on the list how has given me a hand over the > past couple of weeks as I get my "sea legs" with spamassassin. It's > working well for me now but I obviously still have more to learn. > > For one, I'm still

Spoofed amazon order email

2021-04-16 Thread Steve Dondley
First, thanks to everyone on the list how has given me a hand over the past couple of weeks as I get my "sea legs" with spamassassin. It's working well for me now but I obviously still have more to learn. For one, I'm still uncertain on the best way to fine tune SA to beat back some tricky

Re: sa-learn using multiple CPUs?

2021-04-16 Thread Axb
How hard is it to keep list mail on list and not reply directly to sender? Have you seen https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/contrib/HOWTO.Bayes-Redis/ ? there may be some helpful info in there. On 4/16/21 9:47 AM, Christian Völker wrote: Thanks for the hint. I will monitor

Re: sa-learn using multiple CPUs?

2021-04-16 Thread Axb
To avoid suprises, remember to watch your memory usage. Redis reads/writes the DB in memory and only dumps to disk for backup. "redis-cli info" is of help On 4/16/21 9:10 AM, Christian Völker wrote: Sorry to annoy you. Another addition to my tests: When using redis it took me around

Re: sa-learn using multiple CPUs?

2021-04-16 Thread Christian Völker
Sorry to annoy you. Another addition to my tests: When using redis it took me around 15seconds to scan ~1,500 messages. When using MariaDB it took one minute to do the same. With file based I had strange issues whatever lock type eI used (flock yes/no): "bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to

Re: sa-learn using multiple CPUs?

2021-04-16 Thread Christian Völker
Hi, So I will re-configure my installation to use MariaDB. You should also consider the Redis backend. Ok, had a look when using MariaDB and I monitored it for the last 24hrs. My 10 vCPUs where used, no I/O waits. But CPU usage overall was according to "top" only at 25% as top showed 75%