Hi,
we have seen a recent upsurge in SPAM and would like to ask the community for
recommendations on both free and commercial RBL offerings. We are currently
using:
Barracuda
SpamRats
JunkEmailFilter
SpamEatingMonkey
Plus the standard ones that are checked with SpamAssassin. We are also
of our clients
and at 06:42 it appeared on one of the RBLs. I am guessing that it must have
been a huge spam mailing that hit a lot of honeypots and people all at once.
Downside is not a happy client ;(
--
Thanks, Phil
- Original Message -
Am 11.01.2012 12:28, schrieb --[ UxBoD ]--:
Hi
- Original Message -
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 16:50 +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
We're on a BT only exchange here so it's them or nothing, well not
quite, I could go CoLo... hmmm maybe not, or satellite, I was
involved in setting that up in Cyprus.
Nigel
Is there such a thing?
- Original Message -
Hi,
Just wondering if others are also seeing an increase in image spam in
the last week or so, some of which contain zip attachments? The body
contains random bayes killer? text with an image or zip attachment.
I can't otherwise find something to trigger on to
- corpus.defero corpus.def...@idnet.com wrote:
I was looking at a piece of irritating pill spam this morning
((http://pastebin.com/qzj83QKq)) and noticed this in the body, just
after a random excerpt from chapter 58 of 'The Awakening':
---34AD8EF316667417464496762D36F3502061F3
- Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
(And of course, if this catches on, you'll have to provide RFC
style
documentation.)
See Justins posting from two days back:
http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark/
- dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/mtx/
--
Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want,
and deserve to get it good and hard. - H. L. Mencken
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
Like the simplicity and it does appear to be a great idea. Why do
- te...@cnysupport.com wrote:
I've recently started receiving web form spam, but I'm not quite
sure what to make of it.
My websites contains a couple of support request forms that ask for
minimal information (business name, name, phone, problem, email
address).
Recently, I've
- Mike Cardwell spamassassin-us...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
| On 11/01/2010 10:22, Jason Haar wrote:
| Hi there
|
| We've been getting a few of these leaking through in the past couple
| of
| weeks.
|
| http://pastebin.com/m574da717
|
| They aren't triggering (enough) network rule
- Lars Ebeling lars.ebel...@leopg9.no-ip.org wrote:
| Or am I blacklisted?
|
| --
| Regards
| Lars Ebeling
All appears okay ...
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content and is believed to be clean.
SplatNIX IT Services :: Innovation through collaboration
- Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
| --On Monday, October 05, 2009 11:50 PM +0200 mouss
| mo...@ml.netoyen.net
| wrote:
|
| Thomas Mullins a écrit :
| We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years now. But,
| my
| coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they have
- Clunk Werclick mailbacku...@googlemail.com wrote:
| On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 16:37 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
| On 12-Sep-2009, at 10:27, Clunk Werclick wrote:
| I disagree. It can do as much harm as good. My own view and
| observation
| from the past have rendered it pointless in my
- Clunk Werclick mailbacku...@googlemail.com wrote:
| On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 11:46 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
|On 12-Sep-2009, at 10:27, Clunk Werclick wrote:
| I disagree. It can do as much harm as good. My own view and
| observation from the past have rendered it
- Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
| On 12-Sep-2009, at 10:27, Clunk Werclick wrote:
| I disagree. It can do as much harm as good. My own view and
| observation from the past have rendered it pointless in my
| context. It
| adds latency, is easily poisoned
Clunk Werclick mailbacku...@googlemail.com wrote:
| On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 12:24 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
| - Clunk Werclick mailbacku...@googlemail.com wrote:
|
| | On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 11:46 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
| |On 12-Sep-2009, at 10:27, Clunk Werclick
- Charles Gregory cgreg...@hwcn.org wrote:
| On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Clunk Werclick wrote:
| Clearly not - but then, using Spamassassin as a filter ensures just
| about everything gets through CUNTFACE.
|
| Congratulations! You've done something I have very rarely seen
| on any internet
- Chris Owen ow...@hubris.net wrote:
| On Sep 14, 2009, at 11:38 AM, LuKreme wrote:
|
| On 14-Sep-2009, at 10:17, jdow wrote:
| :0
| * 9876543210^0 ^From: .*\mailbacku...@googlemail.com\
| * 9876543210^0 ^From:.*clunk\.wercl...@wibblywobblyteapot\.co\.uk
| /dev/null
|
| Will work
- LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
| On 14-Sep-2009, at 10:17, jdow wrote:
| :0
| * 9876543210^0 ^From: .*\mailbacku...@googlemail.com\
| * 9876543210^0 ^From:.*clunk\.wercl...@wibblywobblyteapot\.co\.uk
| /dev/null
|
| Will work better. (and you don't need a lock on /dev/null)
|
| --
|
- Bill Landry b...@inetmsg.com wrote:
| On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
|
| One thing they all have in common is their registration dates are
| very
| young according to whois lookups. It seems in general if we had a
| reliable way to lookup domain age we might be able to
|
- Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
| On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 18:55 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
| | Still working fine for me here, 51 hits so far today against DOB.
|
| Not come across that RBL before! Thanks :)
|
| grep _DOB *.cf# Part of the stock rule-set
- Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
| On man 14 sep 2009 16:54:39 CEST, Bill Landry wrote
| So how far does someone have to go before getting banned from the
| list? Is this not far enough yet?
|
| he just come back with another sender email, with another reply-to, it
|
| will be
- Clunk Werclick mailbacku...@googlemail.com wrote:
| On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 19:52 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
| - Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
|
| | On man 14 sep 2009 16:54:39 CEST, Bill Landry wrote
| | So how far does someone have to go before getting banned from
Hi,
Cannot recall seeing a follow up to John H new rules; Are they available now or
still under test review ?
Best Regards,
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content and is believed to be clean.
SplatNIX IT Services :: Innovation through collaboration
- Marc Perkel m...@perkel.com wrote:
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Chris Owen ow...@hubris.net wrote:
On Aug 14, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Mike Cardwell wrote:
The comparisons on that page are useless. What matters is list policy,
reliability and reputation.
- John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 16:20 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Maybe this will sound dumb but wouldn't it be perfectly
safe to blacklist example.com after all, that isn't a
domain your ever going to get mail from.
Ted
That is there because
- Thomas Casartello tcasarte...@wsc.ma.edu wrote:
Been getting a lot of low scoring stuff like this lately. Any suggestions?
Please post the complete email to pastbin so we can run it through our own
installations. It would help if you let us know which rules it actually hit on
in
Hi,
Where can I find sa-awlUtil as it does not appear to be in the download file ?
Best Regards,
--
SplatNIX IT Services :: Innovation through collaboration
- twofers twof...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a post I have tried several times over the last week to post to this
forum and it never seems to get posted. I don't understand why?
There is nothing exotic about it, just text, a question and email header info I
pasted.
Any idea whats up?
Hi,
Would somebody please let me know what is required to get it to work :) I have
installed the Perl module and enabled the plugin but it never appears to hit :(
Best Regards,
--
SplatNIX IT Services :: Innovation through collaboration
- Mariusz Kruk k...@epsilon.eu.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:20 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hi,
Would somebody please let me know what is required to get it to work
:) I have installed the Perl module and enabled the plugin but it
never appears to hit :(
The plugin itself
- Mariusz Kruk k...@epsilon.eu.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:29 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
- Mariusz Kruk k...@epsilon.eu.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:20 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hi,
Would somebody please let me know what is required to get
- Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:20 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Would somebody please let me know what is required to get it to
work
:) I have installed the Perl module and enabled the plugin but
it
never appears to hit
- snowweb pe...@snowweb.co.uk wrote:
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with
this
1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA issue and
this
list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than SA!
Spamassassin has more than one or two
- Stefan ste...@localside.net wrote:
--[ UxBoD ]--:
- Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:20 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Would somebody please let me know what is required to get it
to
work
:) I have installed the Perl module
look at line 55 of the pastebin ;) you can use that URL I believe.
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44
why not :-
util_rb_2tld grupogsv.com
as that appears as part of the link ?
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
What RBL lookup lists are you using ?
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: [EMAIL
in message
0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5003]
0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
this link works just fine :-
http://mesh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/swatch/swatch-3.2.2.tar.gz
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net
Process Identifier.
When any process is forked (started) it will have unique number associated with
it. It will also have a PPID (Parent Process Identifier) ie. what was the
process that forked the child.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_identifier
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key
Pidfile holds the PID of the forked process ie. /var/run/MailScanner.pid
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone
policyd works a treat :) V2 is also in development aswell.
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869
JM_SOUGHT_3JM_SOUGHT_3
1.0 DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX Delivered direct to MX with Outlook headers
Jason's rules should help you :- http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SoughtRules
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
please post the full message via something like pastebin. we need to see the
headers aswell.
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID
we would need to see the full headers.
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: [EMAIL
Share Pictures and Chat SPAM
4.0 JM_SOUGHT_3JM_SOUGHT_3
4.0 JM_SOUGHT_2JM_SOUGHT_2
so take a look at http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SoughtRules
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A
Resolved. Cleared my sa-keys directory and re-imported them all.
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845
what does netstat -an | grep 783 show ?
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone
it ?
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Justin Mason
please post a URL to a sample message, or via pastebin so that we can run it
through our installations and see what it hits.
what is your SA installation hitting and scoring it as ?
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint
the inline snort station should show some more detail. do you have access to
your routers and switches ?
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver
- Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hi,
I just had this message get through :-
snip
and it only scored 5.6. These are the rules it hit :-
1.23 ADVANCE_FEE_2
0.00 BAYES_50
0.72 SARE_URGBIZ Contains urgent matter
-0.00 SPF_PASS
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
This message has been scanned
/_Antivirus_filter
--
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
This message has
Is decoder (Chris) still developing FuzzyOCR ?
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone
.
Try to contact them as soon as possible to quicken the process of your Card
before your Draft gets Expired.
Let me know as soon as you receive your ATM Master Card.
Thanks.
Mr.tony okou
--
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s
I am running it with SA 3.2.4 with no problems at all.
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP
Do you see if get picked up if you run a lint on your SA installation ?
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44
,__MISSING_REF,__MSGID_OK_DIGITS,__MSGID_OK_HOST,__MSOE_MID_WRONG_CASE,__NONEMPTY_BODY,__SANE_MSGID,__SARE_WHITELIST_FLAG,__TVD_BODY,__UNUSABLE_MSGID
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F
Is a RPM available for Centos5 yet ?
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: [EMAIL
would perhaps be useful to see a spamassassin -D --lint ?
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749
Thanks Justin. Do they all follow the same patterns ?
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP
,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From
Can you post a copy online Martin ? need a few examples to find the common
elements.
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
Does anybody have one of these, or different one, that you could upload
somewhere so can do some analysis ?
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver
Well done Michele :) That is pure class.
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: [EMAIL
-2.3600
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original
LOCAL_PROBE13
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: [EMAIL PROTECTED
__LOCAL_DIG1 __LOCAL_DIG2
score LOCAL_DIG1 3
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749
the same if the IP
address appears in both lists. How can I say on the meta rule that if it
*only* appears in blacklist score -7, and 7 if in whitelist, and if in both use
the yellowlist ?
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
RCVD_IN_LRBL_Y net
score RCVD_IN_LRBL_Y -3
Checked existing rules for help ;)
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver
How can I get the plugin? I have emailed the webmaster a couple of times
but no response :(
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
Same here :(
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:28:51 -0400, Joe Zitnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it having troubles again? I'm having problems reaching the site.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP
by
MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: [EMAIL
a zero spam policy. If you
believe this message to be spam, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID
www.empoweris.com
757-273-9399 (office)
757-715-1944 (cell)
866-477-1544 (toll free)
-Original Message-
From: --[ UxBoD ]-- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 3:26 PM
To: Jason Holbrook
Subject: RE: Holding Spam in a webmail client
That is exactly what
is
quite old.
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hi Jason,
Yes it will work fine. A few minor tweaks are required so nothing
major.
Best thing is to join the mailwatch mailing list and introduce yourself
:)
Regards,
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:03:02 -0400, Jason Holbrook
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed
Which rule sets this ? I have grep'd through /etc/mail/spamassassin and the
variable is used but does not seem to get set anywhere ?
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: 543A E778 7F2D 98F1 3E50 9C1F F190 93E0 E8E8 0CF8
, Cedric BUSCHINI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit :
Which rule sets this ? I have grep'd through /etc/mail/spamassassin and
the variable is used but does not seem to get set anywhere ?
Hi,
Have a look in /usr/share/spamassassin.
There is 60_whitelist.cf for rules and about
the function
eval:check_from_in_whitelist(), but need to see how that works.
On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:48:47 +0200, Cedric BUSCHINI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok - not the same problem I have
is -100 too high for you ?
--[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit :
I have just performed a brand new server install
Resolved :) Thanks.
On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:48:47 +0200, Cedric BUSCHINI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok - not the same problem I have
is -100 too high for you ?
--[ UxBoD ]-- a écrit :
I have just performed a brand new server install with SA 3.2.0 and I
noticed a email this morning that had
to no avail.
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: 543A E778 7F2D 98F1 3E50 9C1F F190 93E0 E8E8 0CF8
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0xE8E80CF8
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749
// SIP Phone: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
This message has
Have just tested with GTUBE and even that does not get picked up!
G. What is happening. My config lints fine.
On Sat, 12 May 2007 07:35:14 +0100
--[ UxBoD ]-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am having real problems in getting SA 3.2.0 to perform Bayes or RBL
checks. For some reason
with --allowplugins,
after removing the directory, and now the plugins get loaded. But yet
again no checks are performed.
Any ideas ?
On Sat, 12 May 2007 08:44:53 +0100
--[ UxBoD ]-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have just tested with GTUBE and even that does not get picked up!
G. What
The point is that if I use either with or without plugins using the
channel breaks SA 3.2.0.
On Sat, 12 May 2007 15:25:23 -0400
Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Eureka! Found the problem at last. It is down to the updates from
saupdates.openprotect.com
Using both though the channel update for openprotect seems to break
it. Switched to rules-du-jour and all is okay now.
On Sat, 12 May 2007
15:05:20 -0400 Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:04:22AM +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
plugins were hashed out. I ran
is ending with \n)?
regards,
--
--
B.G. Mahesh
http://www.greynium.com/
http://www.oneindia.in/
http://www.click.in/ - Free Indian Classifieds
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key
Regards,
On Wed, 9 May 2007 10:22:55 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To ensure all is working okay, why not take a existing SPAM message and
construct the $message from that and test ?
On Wed, 9 May 2007 14:40:52 +0530, BG Mahesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/9/07, Duncan Hill
and that all looks fine. I have tested with
a spam message and debug enabled and no errors are produced. Is there any
additional debugging I can do ?
TIA
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: 543A E778 7F2D 98F1 3E50 9C1F F190 93E0 E8E8
Here is my lint :-
SpamAssassin Lint[18703] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all0
[18703] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG 8E-05
[18703] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version 3.2.03E-05
[18703] dbg: config: score set 0 chosen.0.00064
[18703] dbg: util: running in
: Mail_SpamAssassin_CompiledRegexps_body_0_scan1
Any ideas on how to resolve it ?
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: 543A E778 7F2D 98F1 3E50 9C1F F190 93E0 E8E8 0CF8
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0xE8E80CF8
// Phone: +44 845 869
to be clean.
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: 543A E778 7F2D 98F1 3E50 9C1F F190 93E0 E8E8 0CF8
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0xE8E80CF8
// SIP Phone: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
This message has been scanned for viruses
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import
// Fingerprint: 543A E778 7F2D 98F1 3E50 9C1F F190 93E0 E8E8 0CF8
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0xE8E80CF8
// SIP Phone: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
This message has been scanned for viruses
If you wish to reject at MTA level then please read
http://www.postfix.org/uce.html under the section Client hostname/address
restrictions as you are able to specify a list of RBLs.
Regards,
UxBoD
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:20:16 +0200, Rocco Scappatura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What MTA are you
it in the spam folders and they get learned. But the text in
the image spam causes ham type text to be learned as spam. That causes
ham to get higher scores.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: curl
I only have a small installation but have seen a 50% increase in SPAM recently
:( and a lot of it isn't be caught, even
with splenty of rules and FuzzyOCR, due to them being very well worded emails
:( :(
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 15:53:23 +
Matt Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would of
Sorry for asking as I am sure that it has already been covered. But if
there a rule for the new spate of drug SPAM where the URL has Remove
* to make the link working! in it ?
Thanks,
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner,
and is
believed to be
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:25:12 +
Nigel Frankcom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:49:03 +, --[ UxBoD ]--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for asking as I am sure that it has already been covered. But
if there a rule for the new spate of drug SPAM where the URL has
Remove
IMHO I would imagine that recently, due to the SPAM changes, that your
Bayes has become poisoned. But I could be well wrong.
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 06:09:24 -0500
Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The amount of spam getting through my filters has been steadily
increasing. From a start of under
Check out http://policyd.sourceforge.net/ then as it allows you to
specify Servers/IP that should not be greylisted. Works very well.
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:33:19 -
Matthew Bickerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am setting up a new server, so have a chance to make big changes to
my
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
