Len Conrad wrote:
example:
Sep 16 01:18:22 mx1 amavis[11483]: (11483-01-31) Passed CLEAN,
[12.xx.40.141] [12.xx.40.141] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED], mail_id: 2M64mzvIA3wf, Hits: -,
queued_as: 2CC9D1AF49B, 407 ms
is - the same as 0.0, or
Larry Nedry,
Out of the last 249,000 emails, DKIM_VERIFIED has only hit 18 times.
DKIM_SIGNED on the other hand has hit about 58,000 times.
This is highly unusual, my stats show that overall 80% of messages
with a DKIM or DK signature bear a valid signature, and 20% fail
validation. (checking
On Tuesday 26 August 2008 10:09:37 mouss wrote:
dms dms wrote:
Hello all,
I searched high and low but could not find anywhere that says the
following rule patten is invalid or not allowed in SpamAssassin 3.2.5 on
CentOS 5.1 However it works with non-zero numbers... Thoughts? and TIA
Thiago,
Running spamassassin - lint -D the .pre files are read:
# spamassassin --lint -D
...
[1002] dbg: config: using /etc/mail/spamassassin for site rules pre
files
[1002] dbg: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre
[1002] dbg: config: read file
Munroe,
SA getting stuck on a message
I have only seen this happen on Cron messages generated by our
apt-cacher. I am running a Debian Lenny machine with:
SpamAssassin version 3.2.5, Perl version 5.10.0, amavid-new 2.6.0
Aug 1 13:02:19.507 /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[4388]: (04388-01) SA dbg:
Dan,
I installed WrongMX.pm today, on my secondary MX, but it does not appear
to be firing. A spamassassin -D --lint does show the module to be
loaded, and the module shows up in my amavisd-new logs:
Jul 23 13:33:56 foo amavis[17285]: (17285-01) extra modules
loaded:
On Monday 21 April 2008 06:27:57 Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
The possibility of catering the reporting protocols to different sites
(i.e. the major free sites have their own reporting systems that might be
better used). It's beyond the scope of this thread, but are there any
docs on how
On Friday 11 April 2008 15:05:59 Justin Mason wrote:
Mark Martinec writes:
It would also block some messages which you may or may not want to block,
such as:
- some automatic notifications such as calendar/meeting reminders,
notifications from ticketing/PR systems (OTRS), status
On Friday 11 April 2008 11:13:09 Jason Haar wrote:
So are you saying as I know what all our relays are (ie
whitelist_bounce_relays), I should pump that score up to 20, and
effectively blacklist (we block at scores 10) any bounces (which should
just happen to be 100% forged spam) sent from
Joseph Brennan wrote:
Jeff Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the problems is that the actual spam email is sometimes not
attached. But interestly enough we are usually sent the email header of
the original email. From that we (the humans) can easily spot that the IP
address of the
Jan-Peter,
I just noticed BotNet (0.8) causing SA timeouts
Then it just hangs for quite some time and finally runs into the
timeout. Any idea?
A known problem, it uses a default timeout of Net::DNS,
which is very long for certain unresolvable DNS queries.
Try the following patch:
---
On Friday 04 April 2008 21:45:11 SM wrote:
MS Outlook and a few other MUAs support it. There's an option to
split a message into several parts. [...] It's a useful feature
if you want to get around message size limits to send attachments.
It can also be handy when there's poor connectivity.
Yes, we have also seen it on many of our clients domains.
Same here.
Does anyone have operational experience with a scheme of labeling
envelope sender addresses to recognize legitimate bounces to own mail,
such as the BATV scheme (Bounce Address Tag Validation):
http://mipassoc.org/batv/
On Thursday 28 February 2008 23:26:49 Martin Gregorie wrote:
What is this domainkeys of which they speak?
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4870.txt
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4871.txt
http://www.dkim.org/info/dkim-faq.html
http://www.dkim.org/
Mark
On Sunday 03 February 2008 16:14:37 OliverScott wrote:
Not sure if this will be of any use to anyone else, of if it can be made to
work with anything other than Exim, but here is the first draft of a script
to generate a whitelist based on outgoing email! I have had it running on a
server (for
header L_P0F_WXP X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint =~ /^Windows XP(?![^(]*\b2000
SP)/ score L_P0F_WXP 2.3
header L_P0F_W X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint =~ /^Windows(?! XP)/
score L_P0F_W 1.0
[...]
Matt Kettler wrote:
Well, that much should be obvious.
Both rules are explicitly designed to
Pascal,
it seems that since my upgrade to spamassassin 3.2.4, the DKIM an
DomainKeys verifiers are no more used.
All I see in the debug test are the following line :
# spamassassin -D testmail.txt | grep -i dkim
[4163] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM from @INC
I think you mean http:\/\/[^\/]+\. in those REs.
Use delimiters than slash to avoid leaning toothpicks syndrome:
uri xxx m{^http://[^/]+ ... }i
Mark
Ben,
m{^https?://(?:\w+\.)*google\.(com|co\.uk|tw)/\{2,\}search}
Btw, there is no need to quote braces within the regexp,
as long as they are balanced (as they usually are).
m{^https ... /{2,}search}
Mark
David,
I want to give users control of the required_score variable.
I am using Postfix // SpamAssassin // amavis.
...
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e
/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} ${recipient}
If your
On Thursday 13 December 2007 02:07:00 Bob Proulx wrote:
The problem is that it is based upon the from address. That is an
unreliable piece of data. Spammers forge from addresses all of the
time. Even valid senders will sometimes fabricate from addresses. If
the input to the equation can't
Turns out that upgrading my perl version actually downgraded my libnet
version. :\ They seem to include libnet with perl now, but as an older
version. I still have libnet installed (1.21), but perl uses the old one
from the basepackage.. What shall I do? Is it ok to simply
delete
Tillman,
Net::SMTP::recipient:
unknown option(s) ORCPT - ignored at (eval 65) line 251
Oh, and does anyone know where the last line comes from? Appeared after the
last perl upgrade...
Older versions of Net::SMTP (libnet) did not support ORCPT option
and issue a warning. Not a serious
Tillman,
Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/utf8_heavy.pl line 211.
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/utf8_heavy.pl line 347.
plugin: eval failed: panic: swash_fetch at /etc/mail/spamassassin/KAM.cf,
rule __KAM_STOCKTIP50, line 1.
Appeared after the last perl
On Tuesday 04 December 2007 17:05:04 Johnson, S wrote:
554 5.6.0 Reject, is=26786-18 - Bad_Header: Duplicate header field:
Message-ID
This nondelivery report was generated by the program amavisd-new at host
mail.maildomain.com. Our internal reference code for your message is
Morvan Daniel,
I try webmin clamav module.
I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin perl module. Quarantined messages
are in plain text format below /var/spool/amavisd/quarantine/spam-xxx.gz.
If I use the resend buton from web interface (webmim clamav quarantine
module) to recover some
Morvan Daniel,
I use amavisd-new with spamassassin loaded as a perl module.
My actual config: /etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf:
$sa_tag_level_deflt = 2.0; # 2+ put X-Spam-Status headers only
$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5.0;# 5+ put X-Spam-Flag = YES
$sa_kill_level_deflt = 8; # 8+ send to
Ram,
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5589
I had patched my SA 3.2.3 with the Big Combo patch , but that patch is
apparently cancelled with now a replacement patch
Do I need to bother ?
No need to worry. Either keep it as it is,
or apply the current version of the
John Rudd wrote:
If you want to disable JUST spamhaus, and not the other RBLs:
Find the rules cf files (probably in /usr/local/share/spamassassin)
grep through the files to find the names of the various spamhaus rules.
Go to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf (or wherever your site wide
On Monday 15 October 2007 23:52:04 Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BP comprised of people who know how email works.
Wish this list would use e.g., mailman, where one can turn off delivery.
I wish I had an ice cream cone. :)
We use what the ASF provides to us for free.
Lars,
Oct 10 09:17:05 www amavis[2981]: (02981-06) BAD HEADER from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-encoded 8-bit data (char FC hex) in message
header
'X-Spam-Report'\n X-Spam-Report: ... Nachricht wurde nur
\\374bervertrauensw...\n
The administrator claims to be using version 3.2.3 and
On Wednesday October 10 2007 09:58:35 John Rudd wrote:
I want:
use_rbls zen.spamhaus.org list.dsbl.org foo.bar.baz
A concept of per-zone settings (not per-rule) would also
allow other similar configurations, such as specifying
timeouts individually for each zone, allowing to quickly
give up
On Tuesday October 9 2007 20:19:36 Loren Wilton wrote:
To me it looks like a misfeature.
I think I would agree that it may be a misfeature in the case of this
specific header. In general though it may not be. Consider the case of
two separate Subject: headers, often with completely
I prepared a new version of the async timeout handlings patch
for SpamAssassin 3.2.3, to include the more recent feedback
and findings on compatibility. The issue is decribed at:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5589
I would appreciate if anyone is willing to give it a
Per,
X-Originating-IP: [17.148.16.66]
X-Originating-IP: 134.32.140.207
...
It looks to me like the two X-Originating-IP lines are merged into
one, and my regex is then applied to:
X-Originating-IP: [17.148.16.66]134.32.140.207
True (with newline inbetween).
Is this normal/correct
Frank,
Oct 2 09:15:57 localhost spamd[6032]: info: entering helper-app run mode
Oct 2 09:15:57 localhost spamd[6032]: pyzor: opening pipe: /usr/bin/pyzor
check /tmp/.spamassassin6032naLz9htmp
Oct 2 09:15:57 localhost spamd[6033]: util: setuid: ruid=0 euid=0
Oct 2 09:16:02 localhost
Frank,
pyzor_timeout 5
where do I have to look for this parameter? I grepped through /etc
recursive but there was no value pyzor_timeout.
$ man Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor
A different question is why pyzor took longer than 5 seconds.
Make sure pyzor works from a command line first.
SELECT count(*)
FROM bayes_token
WHERE id = '4'
AND ('1190846660' - atime) '345600';
Who the hell wrote *that* query? Is MySQL smart enough to rearrange
that equation to give an indexable comparison?
It doesn't seem to make any
Giampaolo,
how to catch timeouts from outstanding asynchronous
queries in SA 3.2.3.
Justin Mason writes:
could you open an enhancement request? there should be a callback
function that we call on the $obj hash, timeout_callback maybe.
Until that's implemented, see the code for
Jeff,
Thanks for the patch Mark. I'll put it in production tomorrow.
For your purpose, you want to run it with option '-d info', e.g.:
# amavisd -d info
which will give you the 'info'-level debug at amavisd log level 1
or above (set: $log_level=1);
With the next version I'll make the '-d
Michael,
I tried. That was my first suggestion. That would fix graylisting
(which I don't do), fix SPF an SPF HELO, and SENDER ID, blacklisting,
tarpitting, etc.
SPF, sid, blacklisting etc. work just fine on an internal host as long
as the proxy is preserving the information about the
Just in case, make sure the --lint passess with no complaints, e.g:
# su vscan -c 'spamassassin --lint'
David B Funk writes,
Cannot tell for sure (I don't use amavisd) but that looks like something
is broken in the way that messages are being passed into the SA engine so
that it no longer
Giampaolo,
Almost. One of the biggest problems I see is that one can't register a
socket with AsyncLoop.pm. Thereby, when DNS lookups are finished, the whole
loop stops regardless of outstanding non-DNS-based lookups.
See sub complete_lookups in AsyncLoop.pm:
my $nfound =
Giampaolo,
Well, I have 3.2.1 and the excerpt from AsyncLoop.pm was from there.
But anyway, how is supposed to be set the timeout value of a non-DNS query?
The current code in trunk is able to specify and honour individual
timeouts for each async request - and it defaults to rbl_timeout
if not
Jeff,
I'm working on a SpamAssassin plugin for a university research project.
I've debugged a lot of it by running SpamAssassin from the command line,
and using the SA logger's dbg() and info() methods to output stuff.
Now I need to put it in a production server and see the same debug
jonathan,
so given that amavisd is already daemonized... does this suggest that
there would be minimal gains in moving to spamd called from postfix?
Yes, practically no difference in throughput, possibly even some loss
in throughput due to spamc/spamd being invoked once per recipient,
and
On Wednesday September 12 2007 20:36:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while setting proper trust relatios can solve the problem for mails
internal to the system, without that auth'd bit in the received header
everybody outside the system will still see the message as coming from
a dialup and
On Monday September 10 2007 10:24:58 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use perl and it upgraded my system
from spamassassin 3.1.8 to 3.2.3, once that happen when mail comes into
the box I get this error...
parts_decode_ext FAILED: parsing
file(1) results - missing last 1 results at (eval 65) line
ram,
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 08:36 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
No, because all the DNS tests are run together as a batch.
(this way the lookups run in parallel)
Besides, if completewhois is the only slow RBL, the timeout for it is
going to effectively be 4 seconds anyway. (ie: if 90% of the
Bret,
I'm trying to get received headers to parse correctly because the ones from
CommuniGate Pro don't always. And, since I'm already modifying the headers
in my connector due to the MTA not being able to do RDNS without rejecting
based on it, I'm not aware that certain types of headers
On Sunday September 2 2007 12:16:30 Yves Goergen wrote:
I'm getting tons of these log messages in the last days:
Sep 2 11:06:37 mond spamd[11276]: Day '39' out of range 1..31 at
/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line 445
The number varies from 0 and 32 to 39...
Using
On Saturday September 1 2007 05:06:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If
header J Delivered-To =~ /.mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
doesn't match this mail, but
header J Delivered-To =~ /mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
does, why doesn't
header J Delivered-To =~ /^mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Andy Dills wrote:
For what it's worth, the fuzzyocr hashing is of very limited value, and in
many cases is a severe performance hit. I found that scanning the hashes,
due to the fuzzy nature, is more costly than just rescanning the file
with OCR, as *each* *and* *every* hash must be checked
Simon,
connect to transport spamassassin: Connection refused
You do not have a transport named 'spamassassin' in Postfix master.cf file.
The name of a transport comes from a content_filter setting, a FILTER
action in an access map or header/body checks, or a transport map entry.
The name of a
Richard,
To add information to this problem, it appears that spamd does
eventually give up after 5 minutes
Capture a message causing touble from a MTA queue,
and feed it to a command line spamassassin with -t -D options.
Mark
Bug 5581 / patch attachment 4081 seems to solve my problem
BTW Mark, very nice DNS timings in debug output :)
Thanks for trying it out!
Regards
Mark
On Saturday August 11 2007 02:13:32 John D. Hardin wrote:
What I had in mind was a custom DNS client code, or playing with the
options to Net::DNS to query the authoritative server directly.
Regardless, obtaining that information will be rather ugly.
It may also be impractical or imposssible
John,
Hm. So, I'm sure I can figure this out eventually, but does anyone know
the right Net::DNS way to extract the TTL?
I don't think it is possible to obtain the original TTL from DNS responses.
The information received in a reply only indicates a remaining time
this information has,
Donald,
I had posted before, but we couldn't figure out what was adding 3+
seconds processing time after I upgraded from SA 3.2.1 to 3.2.2.
One reason for slowness is a missing call to {async}-set_response_packet
in Plugin::ASN, which leds SpamAssassin think the request never arrived
and waits
Dan,
Yes, this is normal. An absence of a policy record implies
a default policy, which is a neutral 'signs some mail'.
True, but perhaps, SA could hit a different rule when encountering the
EXPLICIT signsome policy versus the IMPLICIT, i.e.
DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME_DEFAULT or something
Kai,
Mark Martinec wrote on Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:22:22 +0200:
Domains which choose a default policy are not required to publish
a policy (or SSP) record. Penalizing them for choosing not
to explicitly publish what is a default anyway, would be unjust.
I think that's not the point
Rob,
When the domainkey policy record for the domain in question says the
domain signs some of its email.
Heheh.. Yeah, I guessed that much, but, we *don't* sign email. Not
DK(IM) or anything else.
Yes, this is normal. An absence of a policy record implies
a default policy, which is a
John,
Botnet 0.8 is up and available. It took me a while (things have been
REALLY busy at work for the last 6 months), but it's there.
http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/Botnet-0.8.tar
Thanks, very nice.
What changed between 0.7 and 0.8:
It seems a patch by Daniel J McDonald was
Rob,
Yes, this is normal. An absence of a policy record implies
a default policy, which is a neutral 'signs some mail'.
Personally, I find it strange to call 'signs some mail' neutral if
there's nothing that indicates that we might actually do 'sign some
mail'. But I haven't read all docs
So what's the best fix for this? Should one just freeze SA at an
earlier version on a production server until this is fixed upstream?
Is upstream aware of the problem and working on a fix for it?
Find out where the problem lies. When the component that needs fixing
is known, then something
With the PayPal transitioning its service for European customers
from UK to Luxemburg, it is beginning to use new sending address,
which may not be in people's whitelist, so here is my update
to facilitate legitimate PayPal mail reaching its customers
(I'm including ebay entries for good measure):
Peter,
I blew away SA today and am re-installing via CPAN - I think it may be
something to do w/ my Perl installation as a whole... Plausible???
Can't say, my first suspects would be DNS resolver or complex regexps.
I've reinstalled 3 times w/ the same appalling results 10-15 minute
Phil, Bill,
Mark, I patched Dns.pm but this didn't resolve the issue for me.
You can test with the sample messages I posted to bugzilla:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5506
I was getting this sort of symptom without using Botnet.
It's almost as if something's
Daryl writes:
Make sure your milter is providing a return path header field so that SA
gets the correct envelope-from address. I believe old versions of
amavisd-new don't do this. If the milter fails to do this SA will end
up using the From: header field value and, yeah, you'll get SPF fail.
Bill,
There is now an additional patch at:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5511
which should fix this.
Mark, thanks for the patches. However, even with both Dns.pm patches
applied, unless I set rbl_timeout to a high enough time interval, SA
still misses the
...a bug pause here...
bug - big
(29 seconds)
Bill,
Hmmm, once I patched the correct SA version Dns.pm file, Mark's patches
worked fine. However, perhaps my error caused Mark to find a bug, as
noted by his follow-up e-mail, which might have gone undetected
otherwise. :-)
Indeed, thanks! (but there were two other similar reports as
(now if we could decide how to fix/check umask.
No real way of knowing if it's a install/reinstall,
Only flag is during portupgrade I think.
I see, I thought the ports Makefile explicitly makes these
directories if missing, but now I see the perl makefile does it:
...
Installing
Jerry,
This came in with no tag or subject modification. Any idea what's
up? Amavis log follows the message.
(09479-05) Passed, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED],
quarantine HhrEwzHAq2Ia, Message-ID: ..., Hits: 10.769
Most likely reason: recipient domain (durandinterstellar.com)
is
spamd[46771]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/usr/local/share/spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: No buffer space
available
That wouldn't be TCP buffers. It's doing file I/O not network I/O.
Since it's file buffers, which on nearly every OS are dynamic, it
implies Mike's machine
Phil,
What happens if Botnet is patched to use Mail::SpamAssassin::DnsResolver
instead of Net::DNS::Resolver?
I'm musuing about Net::DNS::Resolver's default timeouts and retries...
Phil (probably barking up the wrong tree)
It would do good if Botnet would impose a time limit on its DNS
Actually my DNS is working fine. Other DNS rulesets are hitting fine
like RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
In order to get URI tests working I have to put rbl_timeout 40 in my
local.cf
The default rbl_timeout of 15 is too less, but that is strange. It had
been working with my older SA 3.1.5 though
Michael,
I am using FBSD-6.2 amd64 and ran into this problem when running make:
bunch of other stuff all okay
stopped here:
Manifying blib/man3/Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry.3
make -f spamc/Makefile spamc/libspamc.so
gcc -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE
I am using FBSD-6.2 amd64 and ran into this problem when running make:
bunch of other stuff all okay
stopped here:
Manifying blib/man3/Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry.3
make -f spamc/Makefile spamc/libspamc.so
gcc -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE
+.if ${ARCH} == i386
+.endif
Please don't do that!
Both of the following cc commands need option -fPIC in order
to be able to build a shareable library:
gcc -fPIC -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE spamc/libspamc.c
spamc/utils.c -o spamc/libspamc.so -shared
Luis,
I don't have any URIBL rules firing up (SA 3.2.0 from source here,
most of the other relevant info is in the header of the mail I sent
before to test). Where did you get them?
[...]
But the main difference between the live run and the ones I did with
SA by itself (both as root and as
Luis,
Namely with 22 RBL results coming back, the last one
(which was the crucial URIBL test) had a timeout of 0
and was ignored even though dns result did arrive.
Moreover, there is a bug in Mail::SpamAssassin::Dns, where
a late-spawned URIBL queries (which only start after Razor,
Bill,
Mark, just curious if you are running Botnet? I found that some
messages cause the Botnet RDNS test to timeout after hanging for about
30 seconds, and then network test randomly fail (primarily URIBL
tests). I found that if I disable Botnet, then all network tests will
run fine on
Bill,
Mark, I patched Dns.pm but this didn't resolve the issue for me.
You can test with the sample messages I posted to bugzilla:
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5506
Yes, it is the same problem as I describe in
Can people scan the attached spam for me and let me know what scores
they get?
I got the following hits:
ADVANCE_FEE_1,
BAYES_00,
HTML_MESSAGE
Content analysis details: (8.2 points, 6.8 required)
pts rule name description
--
where are the RELAY_JP and RELAY_NG rules coming from?
Local rules:
# countries prone to abuse and low legit mail volume
# can't count these as spam outright as there is legitamate mail here
# but a slight bias is in order for countries with high spam:ham ratios
header RELAY_TW
where are the RELAY_JP and RELAY_NG rules coming from?
header RELAY_NG X-Relay-Countries=~/\bNG\b/
describe RELAY_NG Relayed through Nigeria
Old cf from Matt Kettler
Indeed.
It might be useful to place these in the base set,
or at least sa-updated rules. I have the impression
that not many
Martin,
Since I upgraded to Spamassassin 3.20 I get this (amavis) messages in my
logfiles (for each incoming mail) Amavis New 2.4.3
May 29 08:21:05 linux1.rk /usr/sbin/amavisd[4365]: (04365-01) extra
modules loaded: Mail/SpamAssassin/Locales.pm,
Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Bayes.pm,
Martin,
You got the syntax wrong, remove the commas, the qw Perl operator
splits on whitespace and commas remain part of a filename.
Removing the commas has one effect:
Starting virus-scanner (amavisd-new):Subroutine
is_charset_ok_for_locales redefined at
Matt Kettler wrote:
Alexander Shikoff wrote:
I get an error when trying to remove an address from AWL:
# spamassassin -x --remove-addr-from-whitelist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[85023] warn: auto-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist file failed: Out of
memory during ridiculously large request at
Ming Hou,
My issue Mail::DKIM and Mail::DomainKeys are required
Crypt::OpenSSL::Random and Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA. But, I could not get
Crypt::OpenSSL::Random to be built successfully because it always
complained the following messages:
Edit Makefile.PL and add -lssl and -lcrypto to the
Jerry Durand wrote:
Someone had asked about a no tests/no score result, one just popped
up in my logs and it's even explains why there are no tests. This
could be a reason for that sort of result.
May 17 21:26:11 interstellar.com /usr/bin/amavisd[15704]: (15704-02)
spam_scan: not wasting
Jerry,
I understand they're not true virus files, but the default value of
0.1 is way low and was causing them to be passed on to users. It
seems the SA rules to catch these should be in the standard set.
Release notes suggest a set of SA rules to match these.
Although high scores can be
No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=1.7 tests=[none]
What does tests=[none] mean?
Matt Kettler wrote:
That's generated by amavis, not spamassassin.
My guess, based on my limited knowledge of amavis, is that message means
one of the following:
Amavis did run the message through SA, but
Is there a standard perl version that the SA team aspires to and uses as
a baseline or some sort?
From the README file:
Perl 5.6.1 or a later version is required.
But 5.8.8 is the workhorse of the day...
Mark
Justin Mason wrote:
I have a theory that this would indeed cause major slowdowns, since
every warning message has to be transmitted via UDP to the syslogd
daemon, who then writes it synchronously to disk. That is a pretty
slow operation, and causes I/O.
Just a guess: if strings being
Justin Mason wrote:
How's this working out? Any good/bad reports?
No problems here, 3.2.0-rc2 is fine and runs nicely
as far as I am concerned (using it with amavisd-new;
no experience with spamd here).
Thanks for the hard work!
Mark
[31077] warn: plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC):
Can't locate Mail/DKIM.pm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -q perl-Mail-DomainKeys
perl-Mail-DomainKeys-1.0
What other package do i need?
Like the message says, you need Mail::DKIM if you have
SA::Plugin::DKIM enabled.
(Mail::DomainKeys
These seem to be conflicts between the POSIX and Fcntl modules from
Perl; not something inherently in FuzzyOcr. FuzzyOcr's author(s)
should really look at whether importing these from two places is really
necessary, however.
Is there anything i can do to fix this?
It is a cosmetic
On Saturday April 14 2007 01:24:47 John Clements wrote:
Date: 05 Apr 2007 05:05:39 -0700
Date: 05 Apr 2007 05:05:39 -0700
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 06:46:01 -0500
Now, I took a quick look at rfc 2822, and all of the Date fields
in this e-mail would appear to be compliant.
Yes, the
501 - 600 of 740 matches
Mail list logo
