Re: MISSING_SUBJECT versus empty subject

2014-11-20 Thread Niamh Holding
Hello Reindl, Wednesday, November 19, 2014, 6:01:32 PM, you wrote: RH should there not be a SUBJECT_EMPTY rule header __NH_BLANK_SUB Subject =~ /^\s*$/ describe__NH_BLANK_SUB Subject is blank metaNH_EMPTY_SUB

Re: MISSING_SUBJECT versus empty subject

2014-11-20 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 19.11.14 19:01, Reindl Harald wrote: i have here a message hitting BAYES_95, CUST_DNSWL_2, CUST_DNSWL_5, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_NONE but *not* MISSING_SUBJECT most likely because Subject: in the headers is that

Re: MISSING_SUBJECT versus empty subject

2014-11-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I remember I have asked the same some years ago. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/104646 the explanation was that the current rule detects empty subject the same as no subject at all. IIRC it was in fact the same rule as it is now: header

MISSING_SUBJECT versus empty subject

2014-11-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Hi i have here a message hitting BAYES_95, CUST_DNSWL_2, CUST_DNSWL_5, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_NONE but *not* MISSING_SUBJECT most likely because Subject: in the headers is that intentional? should there not be a

Re: MISSING_SUBJECT versus empty subject

2014-11-19 Thread Reindl Harald
back to list :-) Am 19.11.2014 um 19:13 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail: On 11/19/2014 1:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Hi i have here a message hitting BAYES_95, CUST_DNSWL_2, CUST_DNSWL_5, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_NONE but *not*

Re: MISSING_SUBJECT versus empty subject

2014-11-19 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 11/19/2014 1:20 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: back to list :-) Sorry about that. i thought about a by default 0 scored rule enabled and scored only via local.cf by the admin or very low scored (0.001) which might make the difference FN/caught and should not hurt a legit message anything with

Re: MISSING_SUBJECT versus empty subject

2014-11-19 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Reindl Harald wrote: i thought about a by default 0 scored rule enabled and scored only via local.cf by the admin or very low scored (0.001) which might make the difference FN/caught and should not hurt a legit message anything with else OK It's more useful to do that

Re: MISSING_SUBJECT versus empty subject

2014-11-19 Thread Axb
On 11/19/2014 07:25 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 11/19/2014 1:20 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: back to list :-) Sorry about that. i thought about a by default 0 scored rule enabled and scored only via local.cf by the admin or very low scored (0.001) which might make the difference FN/caught

Re: MISSING_SUBJECT versus empty subject

2014-11-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 19.11.2014 um 19:25 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail: On 11/19/2014 1:20 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: back to list :-) Sorry about that no problem i thought about a by default 0 scored rule enabled and scored only via local.cf by the admin or very low scored (0.001) which might make the

Re: MISSING_SUBJECT versus empty subject

2014-11-19 Thread Axb
On 11/19/2014 07:29 PM, Axb wrote: On 11/19/2014 07:25 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 11/19/2014 1:20 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: back to list :-) Sorry about that. i thought about a by default 0 scored rule enabled and scored only via local.cf by the admin or very low scored (0.001) which