On 5/3/15, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 03.05.2015 um 05:34 schrieb Nick Edwards:
Is there any reason
reason=invalid (public key: not available) is declared as error
to fail t_dkim_invalid
yes, it hits way too often for legit, signed mail and so produces false
Am 03.05.2015 um 05:34 schrieb Nick Edwards:
Is there any reason
reason=invalid (public key: not available) is declared as error
to fail t_dkim_invalid
yes, it hits way too often for legit, signed mail and so produces false
positives
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
1.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
The score for this rule should be a zero or a near-zero.
There must be some problem with assigning a score to
such test rule (the 1.0 is a default value if a score line
is missing).
T_DKIM_INVALID is a test rule, as such its
On 2015-05-03 5:34, Nick Edwards wrote:
Is there any reason
reason=invalid (public key: not available) is declared as error
to fail t_dkim_invalid
1.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
This is published a neutral so should not be considered invalid
This
Am 03.05.2015 um 13:43 schrieb Nick Edwards:
On 5/3/15, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 03.05.2015 um 05:34 schrieb Nick Edwards:
Is there any reason
reason=invalid (public key: not available) is declared as error
to fail t_dkim_invalid
yes, it hits way too often for
Is there any reason
reason=invalid (public key: not available) is declared as error
to fail t_dkim_invalid
1.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
This is published a neutral so should not be considered invalid
This only occurs since upgrade 3.4.0 - 3.4.1, no
