On Dec 21, 2009, at 9:55 AM, R-Elists wrote:
do you have changes / hopes / ideas / suggestions for SA to make it better
or more better or whatever?
No. SA does (with amavisd-new) exactly what I want it to do, and does it well.
There's lots of stuff I don't use, like marking spam and keeping
On Dec 21, 2009, at 9:55 AM, R-Elists wrote:
do you have changes / hopes / ideas / suggestions for SA to make it better
or more better or whatever?
The only thing I'd really like is more or less cosmetic. I would like
the ability to split rule definition statements over more than one
line.
I
Nope. It works. I'm looking at 3.3 carefully but nothing
stands out.
--
Jo Rhett
Jo,
do you have changes / hopes / ideas / suggestions for SA to make it better
or more better or whatever?
- rh
On Dec 19, 2009, at 9:23 AM, RobertH wrote:
you know, with all the duking it out on the list over some methods
and such,
where is Jo Rhett when you need him?
he was always short and to the point...
:-)
Eh? Whut? (in the manner of someone woken from sleep)
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance :
:-)
Eh? Whut? (in the manner of someone woken from sleep)
--
Jo Rhett
Jo,
sometimes we just need some input from you...
overall though, i am guessing that you havent needed anything special from
the list for a lllooonnn time
- rh
On Dec 20, 2009, at 10:12 PM, RobertH wrote:
sometimes we just need some input from you...
I'm sure that this isn't true of all participants ;-)
overall though, i am guessing that you havent needed anything
special from
the list for a lllooonnn time
Nope. It works. I'm
you know, with all the duking it out on the list over some methods and such,
where is Jo Rhett when you need him?
he was always short and to the point...
:-)
- rh
Good to know - I was not aware that it did the --sync after learning.
Ed
At 03:54 PM Friday, 10/8/2004, Nate Schindler wrote -=
a --sync operation is performed when you sa-learn things. This commits
the journal to the database, and removes the file.
it's recreated, written to, committed, and
I am currently running SA 3.0.0 with a site wide bayes and spamd running as
user spamd.
Database is in /home/spamd
When I pipe false negatives through sa-learn, the bayes_journal file
disappears. Is this by design or is there something I need to change or fix?
Thanks...
Ed
. . . . . . . .
-
From: Ed Kasky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 3:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Oh where, oh where does my bayes_journal go?
I am currently running SA 3.0.0 with a site wide bayes and spamd running as
user spamd.
Database is in /home/spamd
When I pipe false
10 matches
Mail list logo