2015-12-16 14:11 GMT+01:00 Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net
>:
> Roel,
>
> On 12/16/15 4:56 AM, Roel Storms wrote:
> > It should, if you implement parseParameter and all these other methods
> > before getStream is called, in the wrapper it
the HttpServletRequest.getStream since it has no knowledge of this wrapper.
The wrapped object never uses the wrapped implementation of methods since
it has no knowledge of the wrapping.
2015-12-16 4:06 GMT+01:00 Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>
:
> Roel,
>
> On 12/15/15 5:13 PM, Ro
be almost impossible.
Thanks for the advice on the size of requests. I'm still pondering on that
issue.
Roel
2015-12-15 2:10 GMT+01:00 Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>
:
> Roel,
>
> On 12/12/15 11:17 AM, Roel Storms wrote:
> > I believe that this is not entirel
Roel
2015-12-09 18:06 GMT+01:00 Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net
>:
> Roel,
>
> On 12/9/15 8:03 AM, Roel Storms wrote:
> > The real requirement is being able to process the body of a request in a
> > Valve without restricting the servlet to call request.ge
(). The servlet wouldn't be able to call getReader or
getParam anymore. I would like my Valve to be transparent in that sense.
2015-12-09 13:07 GMT+01:00 Konstantin Kolinko <knst.koli...@gmail.com>:
> 2015-12-09 14:13 GMT+03:00 Roel Storms <roel.sto...@gmail.com>:
> > Hello,
by the
Connector.createRequest() method. Is this no longer possible via
configuration?
Kind regards,
Roel Storms
> Roel,
>
> On 11/24/15 10:43 AM, Roel Storms wrote:
> > 2015-11-24 16:11 GMT+01:00 Christopher Schultz <
> ch...@christopherschultz.net
> >> :
> >
> >> Roel,
> >>
> >> On 11/24/15 9:44 AM, Roel Storms wrote:
> >>> I am
. If I need any more information I will not hesitate
to ask. Thanks for all the info!
2015-11-23 23:01 GMT+01:00 André Warnier (tomcat) <a...@ice-sa.com>:
> On 23.11.2015 21:14, Roel Storms wrote:
>
>> Ok, thank you for the clear response. I see the problem with file type
>>
mcat as your session
mechanism. Again, I am still doing some research and maybe what I am doing
is not worth it.
2015-11-24 11:36 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
> On 24/11/2015 10:12, Roel Storms wrote:
> > It's to implement a new session mechanism that guarantees i
or server-side
2015-11-24 15:19 GMT+01:00 Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net
>:
> Roel,
>
> On 11/24/15 5:12 AM, Roel Storms wrote:
> > It's to implement a new session mechanism that guarantees integrity of
> the
> > requests sent in the session and
2015-11-24 16:11 GMT+01:00 Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net
>:
> Roel,
>
> On 11/24/15 9:44 AM, Roel Storms wrote:
> > I am trying to protect the client from:
> >
> > Session fixation
>
> Tomcat already provides session-fixation protection
Ok, thank you for the clear response. I see the problem with file type
elements.
2015-11-23 17:18 GMT+01:00 André Warnier (tomcat) <a...@ice-sa.com>:
> On 23.11.2015 16:31, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 23/11/2015 14:30, Roel Storms wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>
without getInputStream or getReader but with
getParameters, will not work if the data submitted is not in the expected
format.
Kind regards,
Roel Storms
2015-11-23 16:31 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
> On 23/11/2015 14:30, Roel Storms wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am working on a Valve that does some integrity checking on HTTP
> requests
> > (the details aren't important) where I need this valve to
14 matches
Mail list logo
