mod_jk ERR/FRC

2008-03-03 Thread tim.fulcher
Hi I posted to the list our woes back around Christmas, today they seemed to get worse! Our site seems to have been pushed over today and fails to get back running smoothly after multiple restarts of Tomcat and the IIS in front of it. We are expecting a peak of traffic today, but nothing

Tomcat Java Wrapper problems under T4.1.18, jdk1.3.1

2008-01-10 Thread tim.fulcher
Hi I'm attempting to use the Tomcat Wrapper (http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/wrapper.html) on our elderly set-up - Tomcat 4.1.18 Java JDK 1.3.1 Since its the only way I can see to ever obtain thread dumps of Tomcat running as a service. As far as I can tell, the code in ThreadDumpWrapper

RE: ISAPI JK2 ran better than JK, how can that be?

2007-12-13 Thread tim.fulcher
Hmm, I'm running Tomcat 4.1.18 which didn't even support the %D logging directive :-/ But now I have a load balancer in place, with one worker. A status is shown below after about 6hrs of traffic. As you can see the client errors make up about 6% of all incident traffic, though they dwarf

ISAPI JK2 ran better than JK, how can that be?

2007-12-10 Thread tim.fulcher
OK, So our website keeps crashing over the past couple of weeks (usual story on this list eh?) We've been running JK isapi plugin v1.2.15 for a fair while, but the isapi redirector log always contains huge numbers of errors being thrown (see snippet below). We were getting a complete

RE: ISAPI JK2 ran better than JK, how can that be?

2007-12-10 Thread tim.fulcher
Martin Yes, I've read that article, and we're on a win2k server box. That isn't the issue I believe. thanks anyway Tim From: Martin Gainty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 10/12/2007 13:28 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: ISAPI JK2 ran better

RE: ISAPI JK2 ran better than JK, how can that be?

2007-12-10 Thread tim.fulcher
Hi Rainer, Thanks for the response. To cover a few points you made - - Yes, I had a hunch long running requests are a problem; because of our appliction design, some pages invoked for the first time take a while (we can't cache them all!). Is there an easy way to correlate (apart from