2009/10/28 Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net:
Everybody ought to learn a little C at some point. It will make you
really appreciate a relatively clean language like Java.
ICL PLAN3 asembler, anyone? :-)
More seriously, I agree with you and would add a second reason: doing
a
Peter Crowther wrote:
2009/10/28 Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net:
Everybody ought to learn a little C at some point. It will make you
really appreciate a relatively clean language like Java.
ICL PLAN3 asembler, anyone? :-)
More seriously, I agree with you and would add a
I was the happiest man in the world when they delivered our shiny new
System/34. No more punch cards!
--Original Message--
From: André Warnier
To: Tomcat Users List
ReplyTo: Tomcat Users List
ReplyTo: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
Sent: Oct 29, 2009 5:08
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
As long as we're on the [OT] subject, how about learning about the
judicious and parcimonious usage of sorted data structures, on a
computer with 16 Kb of RAM and punched paper cards as its only
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com wrote:
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
As long as we're on the [OT] subject, how about learning about the
judicious and parcimonious usage of sorted data
2009/10/29 Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com:
Univac 1004: 961 *6-bit* bytes of core memory, programmed via squids on a
plugboard. Handled punch cards, paper tape, and printing; tape drive
optional (we didn't have one). Had a tendency to throw cards all over the
room if not
From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com
[mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Crowther
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
That's not even a modern stored-program computer!
Just because it used relays as the logic elements?
It was a stored-program computer
2009/10/29 Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com:
From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com
That's not even a modern stored-program computer!
Just because it used relays as the logic elements?
Hmm. I started writing a response here along the lines of because it
didn't keep the code in
Warren Pace wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com wrote:
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
As long as we're on the [OT] subject, how about learning about the
judicious and parcimonious
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:30 AM, André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com wrote:
Warren Pace wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com wrote:
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: So many timeout values
As long as we're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
On 10/29/2009 4:16 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
More seriously, I agree with you and would add a second reason: doing
a little work in a language that is reasonably close to the metal
gives an insight into how the machine actually works, which
Based on what I have seen is that we often get HTTP code 502 and by
increasing socket timeout those errors disappear. I am not sure why
that happens.
Based on the feedback I got it looks like the below properties file is
ok except the socket timeout piece and I should probably remove that?
Here
Mohit Anchlia wrote:
Based on the feedback I got it looks like the below properties file is
ok except the socket timeout piece and I should probably remove that?
Do I not recall Rainer already telling you that ?
-
To
On 28.10.2009 17:29, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
Based on what I have seen is that we often get HTTP code 502 and by
increasing socket timeout those errors disappear. I am not sure why
that happens.
Based on the feedback I got it looks like the below properties file is
ok except the socket timeout
Thanks a lot!
Would this work with 1.2.27?
Regarding recovery_options: Is there a default value it's set to? On
the link http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
it doesn't have option 7
Regarding ping_mode:
What happens when Cping returns error for ping_mode C? Does it
On 28.10.2009 19:29, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
Thanks a lot!
Would this work with 1.2.27?
Remove the escalation parameter, I guess that's the only 1.2.28 special
param.
Regarding recovery_options: Is there a default value it's set to? On
the link
Thanks. I couldn't find what option retry_options 7 in
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html is for.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 28.10.2009 19:29, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
Thanks a lot!
Would this work with 1.2.27?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mohit,
On 10/28/2009 2:29 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
Regarding recovery_options: Is there a default value it's set to? On
the link http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
it doesn't have option 7
That's because 7 isn't a
I actually have worked on C but didn't read the line about bit mask. Sorry.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mohit,
On 10/28/2009 2:29 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
Regarding recovery_options:
On 26.10.2009 23:40, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
I read about timeouts but I still have following questions:
1. From 1.2.28 onwards, if I don't set the ping_mode then the request
will still be sent to the BE node from workers.list even if that node
is down?
Forwarding http requests to a node or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mohit,
On 10/26/2009 6:40 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
Christopher in one of his earlier replies mentioned that we don't have
failover set. I am not sure why he said that because we have
worker.list and also we have loadbalancer set in our
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mohit,
On 10/25/2009 12:12 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
I also trying to understand cpong, prepost and all other timeouts. But
it's confusing in terms of which one should be used and which ones can
be left alone. We currently have following values, do
On 26.10.2009 16:19, Christopher Schultz wrote:
On 10/25/2009 12:12 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
I also trying to understand cpong, prepost and all other timeouts. But
it's confusing in terms of which one should be used and which ones can
be left alone. We currently have following values, do you
thanks I'll read that and let you know if I have any questions.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 26.10.2009 16:19, Christopher Schultz wrote:
On 10/25/2009 12:12 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
I also trying to understand cpong, prepost and all other
I read about timeouts but I still have following questions:
1. From 1.2.28 onwards, if I don't set the ping_mode then the request
will still be sent to the BE node from workers.list even if that node
is down?
2. Does socket_timeout mean how long the socket connection will be
kept open? So it
Apache 2.2.11
I also trying to understand cpong, prepost and all other timeouts. But
it's confusing in terms of which one should be used and which ones can
be left alone. We currently have following values, do you see any
problem?
worker.host2533.type=ajp13
worker.host2533.port=8009
26 matches
Mail list logo
