Hi,
Can someone guide to download the tomcat 64 bit installer for linux 64 bit
platform?
best regards,
bhuwan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 24/05/2013 08:11, Padhalni, Bhuwan Chandra (Bhuwan Chandra) wrote:
Hi,
Can someone guide to download the tomcat 64 bit installer for linux 64 bit
platform?
No such download exists. There are no architecture dependent components
for Linux (unlike Windows).
The platform neutral .tar.gz
Hi,
I don't understand the meaning of timeout of an asynchronous operation.
Servlet 3.0 says The time out applies to the AsyncContext once the
container-initiated dispatch during which one of the
ServletRequest.startAsync methods was called has returned to the container.
But when is the
On 24/05/2013 09:05, jie tang wrote:
Hi,
I don't understand the meaning of timeout of an asynchronous operation.
Servlet 3.0 says The time out applies to the AsyncContext once the
container-initiated dispatch during which one of the
ServletRequest.startAsync methods was called has returned
Thanks.
So the only way to avoid the invocation of AsyncListener.onTimeout is that
we invoke AsyncContext.complete or AsyncContext.dispatch?
2013/5/24 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
On 24/05/2013 09:05, jie tang wrote:
Hi,
I don't understand the meaning of timeout of an asynchronous
On 24/05/2013 09:16, jie tang wrote:
Thanks.
So the only way to avoid the invocation of AsyncListener.onTimeout is that
we invoke AsyncContext.complete or AsyncContext.dispatch?
Or write some content to the response.
Mark
2013/5/24 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
On 24/05/2013 09:05,
So if I use AsyncContext.start to run a Runnable. When that Runnable does
some work but not write to response, will AsyncListener.onTimeout be
invoked?
2013/5/24 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
On 24/05/2013 09:16, jie tang wrote:
Thanks.
So the only way to avoid the invocation of
On 24/05/2013 09:23, jie tang wrote:
So if I use AsyncContext.start to run a Runnable. When that Runnable does
some work but not write to response, will AsyncListener.onTimeout be
invoked?
Yes, unless you set the timeout to zero or less (no timeout).
The default value is 30 seconds.
Mark
Thank you very much
2013/5/24 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
On 24/05/2013 09:23, jie tang wrote:
So if I use AsyncContext.start to run a Runnable. When that Runnable does
some work but not write to response, will AsyncListener.onTimeout be
invoked?
Yes, unless you set the timeout to
I tried the following code:
final AsyncContext async = req.startAsync();
async.setTimeout(3);
async.addListener(new AsyncListener(){
@Override
public void onComplete(AsyncEvent event) throws IOException {
On 24/05/2013 10:15, jie tang wrote:
I tried the following code:
final AsyncContext async = req.startAsync();
async.setTimeout(3);
async.addListener(new AsyncListener(){
@Override
public void onComplete(AsyncEvent event) throws
But it means that even if I write some content to response, the onTimeout
method is still called
2013/5/24 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
On 24/05/2013 10:15, jie tang wrote:
I tried the following code:
final AsyncContext async = req.startAsync();
async.setTimeout(3);
On 24/05/2013 10:27, jie tang wrote:
But it means that even if I write some content to response, the onTimeout
method is still called
Correct. The timeout starts when the AsyncContext is started and is
reset every time data is written to the response. Exactly the same way
socket timeouts work.
I changed a little in my code:
final AtomicLong writeResponseTime= new AtomicLong(0);
final long timeout = 3;
final AsyncContext async = req.startAsync();
async.setTimeout(timeout);
async.addListener(new AsyncListener(){
@Override
Hi
Basically I want to configure a tomcat cluster.
I am using tomcat 6 and tomcat 7 and I want to store the session in
database.
I am looking to this document
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/cluster-howto.html . But
unfortunately I didn't find any document to store session in database.
Hi,
Does
http://www.intelligrape.com/blog/2010/07/21/tomcat-6-session-persistence-through-jdbcstore/
help
answer your question?
HTH
Kind regards/met vriendelijke groet,
Serge Fonville
http://www.sergefonville.nl
Convince Microsoft!
They need to add TRUNCATE PARTITION in SQL Server
On May 24, 2013, at 7:28 AM, 杨华杰 wrote:
Hi
Basically I want to configure a tomcat cluster.
I am using tomcat 6 and tomcat 7 and I want to store the session in
database.
I am looking to this document
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/cluster-howto.html . But
unfortunately I
Hopefully these open source nosql-tomcat-session-managers could be helpful
in your jorney :
https://github.com/jcoleman/tomcat-redis-session-manager
https://github.com/dawsonsystems/Mongo-Tomcat-Sessions
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Daniel Mikusa dmik...@gopivotal.comwrote:
On May 24,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chirag,
On 5/23/13 11:11 PM, Chirag Dewan wrote:
Chris,
The profiler shows very high CPU utilization in Tomcat threads.
As I said before a lot of time was spent during the
ResponseFacade.setContentType() method call. That doesn't tell the
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone here might have some insight in different behaviors
between 6.0.16 and 6.0.37.
I've been using version 6.0.16 (With CentOS 5) for quite some time - and it has
worked very well. I was in the process of testing a new configuration and was
exploring the
On 24/05/2013 15:54, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Chirag,
On 5/23/13 11:11 PM, Chirag Dewan wrote:
Chris,
The profiler shows very high CPU utilization in Tomcat threads.
As I said before a lot of time was spent during the
ResponseFacade.setContentType() method call. That doesn't tell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chirag,
On 5/23/13 11:11 PM, Chirag Dewan wrote:
As I said before a lot of time was spent during the
ResponseFacade.setContentType() method call. That doesn't tell the
whole story but more or less the high utilization is mainly in the
tomcat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
BT,
On 5/24/13 11:09 AM, B T wrote:
I was wondering if anyone here might have some insight in
different behaviors between 6.0.16 and 6.0.37.
I've been using version 6.0.16 (With CentOS 5) for quite some time
- and it has worked very well. I
On 5/24/2013 9:04 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
BT,
On 5/24/13 11:09 AM, B T wrote:
I was wondering if anyone here might have some insight in
different behaviors between 6.0.16 and 6.0.37.
I've been using version 6.0.16 (With CentOS 5) for
I would first look in the Tomcat log files to see if anything useful
is recorded at the time of the blank response. I'd also ask the
browser to display the page source to see if it's actually empty or
contains something (perhaps quite a lot of something) that renders as
an empty page. It might
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 09:32:46 -0700
From: its_toas...@yahoo.com
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: 6.0.16 vs 6.0.37 puzzle
On 5/24/2013 9:04 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
BT,
On 5/24/13 11:09 AM, B T wrote:
I was
2013/5/24 B T bt1...@live.com:
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone here might have some insight in different behaviors
between 6.0.16 and 6.0.37.
I've been using version 6.0.16 (With CentOS 5) for quite some time - and it
has worked very well. I was in the process of testing a new
Chris,
Sorry I should have posted the data first. I probably missed the most important
part of a load test. I will do it shortly.
And I am not using Jmeter now,I am using an http client for load test. I am
testing it on Solaris x86 server 64bit JVM. And i have collected the samples
for Tomcat
Chris,
I don't think we are using Executor's in our tomcat 6.0.28 server
configuration. Both of the following stack traces clearly indicate that i am
not using executors instead I am using JioEndpoint
I can give two examples from my logs:
Here is the output of kill -3 pid which gives output
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
BT,
On 5/24/13 3:04 PM, B T wrote:
Thanks for your guys' feedback ... I had removed 6.0.37 and
installed 6.0.16. I then put back 6.0.37 (in a different directory)
and tried it again and it somehow magically worked with 6.0.37
(after it had
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ravi,
On 5/24/13 4:59 PM, Vanga Palli, Ravindra Kumar wrote:
I don't think we are using Executor's in our tomcat 6.0.28 server
configuration. Both of the following stack traces clearly indicate
that i am not using executors instead I am using
Hi all,
afther starting tomcat I not that free memory of my VPS still near 0.
So it is normal this large usage of RAM?
O.S.: Debian 7.0 (wheezy) 64 bit
Apache Tomcat/7.0.28
JVM version: 1.7.0_03-b21 (Oracle)
root@ianpapserver:/opt/tomcat/bin# free -m
total used free
Hi everyone
I developed an application using two threads where in one of them I started to
run one socket to ask for information and in the another, application runs a
serversocket to receive the data. In STS runs perfectly(Windows) but when I run
this application on Solaris. threads do not run
Hi Serge, Daniel Albert
Thanks, it does help. Seems like there are many options.
Regards,
Hua Jie
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Albert Kam moonblade.w...@gmail.comwrote:
Hopefully these open source nosql-tomcat-session-managers could be helpful
in your jorney :
On 24.05.2013 17:54, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Top reported that Tomcat was taking somewhere between 550-600% CPU.
(This is a 4-core hyperthreaded CPU so I have 8 logical cores. 'ab'
was taking about 100% CPU so I think 600% CPU means it was roughly
pegging 6 of my logical cores. Roughly 30%
35 matches
Mail list logo
