Re: Problem with mod_proxyajp and Tomcat 7

2014-03-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Mar 5, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Teresa Fasano t.fas...@cineca.it wrote: Hi, I have a communication problem between Apache and Tomcat with mod_proxy_ajp. The Apache version is 2.2.15. The problem occurred only with Tomcat 7 ( the same problem occurred with various version 7.0.x ), while it

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Tomcat 5.5.35 Released.

2012-01-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat 5.5.35 stable. Apache Tomcat 5.5.35 is primarily a security and bug fix release. All users of older versions of the Tomcat 5.5 family should upgrade to 5.5.35. Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:

Re: Availability of Tomcat 5.5.34

2011-09-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
Tomcat 5.5.34 was released and announced yesterday... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: Availability of Tomcat 5.5.34

2011-09-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
I am TRing 5.5.34 today... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: Availability of Tomcat 5.5.34

2011-08-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
My plan is to TR 5.5.34 the week after next… I'm traveling next week :/ On Aug 12, 2011, at 12:25 AM, Sachin Mankapure wrote: Hi Jim, Is there any update on release date of 5.5.34? Thanks, -Sachin Jim Jagielski wrote: I am tempted to do a release next week... we seem to have

Re: Availability of Tomcat 5.5.34

2011-07-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
I am tempted to do a release next week... we seem to have enough to warrant it. On Jul 21, 2011, at 5:57 AM, Sachin Mankapure wrote: Thanks. I wanted to know *when* 5.5.34 will be available. I got the answer. Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2011/7/20 msachin sachin.mankap...@gmail.com:

[ANN] Apache Tomcat 5.5.31 released

2010-09-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
The Apache Tomcat Team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat 5.5.31 stable. Apache Tomcat 5.5.31 is primarily a security and bug fix release. All users of older versions of the Tomcat 5.5 family should upgrade to 5.5.31. Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:

Re: 2 second delays in mod_jk while maintaining workers

2010-09-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Sep 9, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: On 09/09/2010 02:09 PM, John Baker wrote: Thanks for the feedback. Can you tell me why this if statement exists: if (poll(fds, 1, timeout) 0) { ... } else break; It appears to be at

Re: Feedback Requested: Proposed CLI Tool for Apache Tomcat; kitty.

2010-08-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
Any interest in the code moving to the ASF incubator? On Aug 16, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Networked wrote: Elevator pitch Myself and Peary Chiu have created a lightweight utility for administering Tomcat from the command line in our copious amounts of free time on the weekends. This is a very

[ANN] Apache Tomcat 5.5.30 released

2010-07-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
The Apache Tomcat Team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat 5.5.30 stable. Apache Tomcat 5.5.30 is primarily a security and bug fix release. All users of older versions of the Tomcat 5.5 family should upgrade to 5.5.30. Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:

Re: Apache 2.2 to Tomcat 6 via proxy_ajp

2009-05-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
On May 21, 2009, at 10:28 PM, J. Zimmerman wrote: I am just getting started with Tomcat and have been asked to take on the administration of our Tomcat servers at our college. I am not one of the developers, just the administrator. So far everything has gone pretty smoothly except for

Re: ProxyPaths and mod_proxy_ajp

2008-03-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
Seems to me you are using Apache as a front-end to TC. In which case you are telling Apache that whatever is under /examples should be handled by TC, everything else is local... Right so far? If so, then you for SURE do not what to configure Apache as a forward proxy, which is what you are doing

Re: [Announce] Enhanced ISAPI Redirector + Tomcat Connector Binaries

2007-12-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Dec 21, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Tim, Tim Whittington wrote: There's one in particular that we feel is very useful that hasn't been accepted though, which is the addition of chunked encoding support to the ISAPI Redirector, which allows IIS to use HTTP keep alives

Re: mod_proxy_ajp TIME_WAIT

2007-11-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
for 2.2.6 ? Thanks D On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 14:39 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: I'm hoping to get it out the top of December :) On Nov 20, 2007, at 3:57 AM, David Cassidy wrote: Hi Jim !!! This is fantastic news ! When is 2.2.7 going to be released ? :) Many many thanks David On Mon, 2007

Re: mod_proxy_ajp TIME_WAIT

2007-11-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'm hoping to get it out the top of December :) On Nov 20, 2007, at 3:57 AM, David Cassidy wrote: Hi Jim !!! This is fantastic news ! When is 2.2.7 going to be released ? :) Many many thanks David On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 15:27 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: 2.2.6 has a nasty bug were AJP

Re: mod_proxy_ajp TIME_WAIT

2007-11-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
Is this worker or prefork MPM? On Nov 15, 2007, at 4:03 AM, David Cassidy wrote: Guys, I'm using mod_proxy in apache 2.2.6 with the ajp connector in tomcat. apache config - Proxy balancer://myclusterclear BalancerMember ajp://localhost:8009 route=server1 min=0

Re: Upgrade from mod_jk to mod_proxy_ajp

2007-11-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 17, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Pid wrote: Gmail User wrote: On Nov 9, 2007 11:19 PM, Gmail User [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any ideas would be appreciated. Just a follow-up since I never got a reply to this--or Gmail is hiding replies from me again. As I found out, Tomcat always worked and

Re: mod_proxy or mod_jk?

2007-11-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
It almost sounds like it's more a config issue than a module one... Using mod_proxy_ajp is nice because you use normal httpd directives (ProxyPass. etc..) to handle the stuff that TC needs to handle. On Nov 17, 2007, at 8:20 PM, Rocco Scappatura wrote: Hello. I would like to publish a Web

Re: mod_proxy_ajp TIME_WAIT

2007-11-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
2.2.6 has a nasty bug were AJP connections are being closed when they shouldn't. 2.2.7 will fix that. In the meantime, trying building httpd with USE_ALTERNATE_IS_CONNECTED defined as 0 (proxy_util.c). On Nov 19, 2007, at 9:07 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi David, TIME_WAIT is a normal TCP state

Re: Tomcat fronted with apache best practices?

2007-10-25 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Oct 25, 2007, at 7:17 AM, Dragan Jotanovic wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: It all depends on your application. You need to profile it, understand what resources are required per user / session / request (which ever makes sense for your application) and then scale the system appropriately.

Re: Very Slow Startup with APR

2007-08-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Aug 21, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Markus Schönhaber wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: There's an addition in tcnative 1.1.10: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/ src/ssl.c?view=diffrev=524725r1=524724r2=524725

Re: Very Slow Startup with APR

2007-08-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Aug 22, 2007, at 11:32 AM, Markus Schönhaber wrote: 2. If tcnative 1.1.10 is used, set the environment variable RANDFILE to point to some random source which can be accessed without danger of blocking (for example /dev/urandom) or create a static random file in the home dir of the user

Re: Very Slow Startup with APR

2007-08-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Aug 21, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: Followup to self: There's an addition in tcnative 1.1.10: Looks like this went through further refactoring in: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/ src/ssl.c?r1=524725r2=525163 I just checked HEAD on trunk

Re: ajp through ProxyPass is sending HTTP HEAD requests as HTTPGET to servlets.

2007-08-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
Added as PR: 43060 Thanks for the info and the analysis... I'll take a look and tune as required. On Aug 8, 2007, at 5:46 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Chad, yes, it looks like that's a bug in mod_proxy_ajp. You should log a bug in bugzilla for httpd. I checked the code for Apache httpd

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.25-dev

2007-08-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
So far, so good. +1 On Aug 3, 2007, at 2:40 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi all, unfortunately we had to withdraw mod_jk 1.2.24. It had a serious regression bug. To ensure the quality of the new 1.2.25 we invite you to actively participate in testing. A code snapshot (revision 562250) is

Re: iPlanet / SunONE web server tomcat connector connection re-use disabled

2007-07-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jul 6, 2007, at 4:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: QUESTION: Can anyone confirm or deny whether the Netscape connector should not have connection re-use enabled as the other connectors do. Some overview of any reason would also be much appreciated. It does not, but would be a good

Re: proxy_balancer_module modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so in httpd-2.0.52-28.ent.i386 ??

2007-04-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
The balancer code is only part of httpd 2.2.x On Apr 11, 2007, at 4:01 AM, Paresh Mutha wrote: The feature I am looking for proxy_balancer_module modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so. Can some one tell me if this is available on RHEL4 ie in

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.21-dev

2007-02-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 26, 2007, at 3:53 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Kirk, I never built for Sun Web Server, but I just saw the configure flag: --enable-netscape Did you ever try running configure with that one before doing the make? Yes, I added that at the 1.2.21-dev phase specifically to allow for

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.21-dev

2007-02-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
Let me know what you find. I had updated the configure.in file to add the --enable-netscape option and updated the BUILDING and Makefile.solaris files. I should likely update the netscape/README file with the notes from BUILDING... On Feb 26, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Kirk wrote: I will take a look at

Re: Quality check mod_jk 1.2.21-dev

2007-02-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 26, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi all, the next version of mod_jk is approaching its release. A code snapshot is available at http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/ It is in the same format as a release download, so easy to build. Under the same URL you can find

Re: Compiling mod-jk plugin for SunOne on Solaris

2007-02-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 21, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Kirk wrote: There was a thread from February 1st on this same issue. I am having the same problem that person did, but I tried everything in the thread and still no luck. After I get mod_jk compiled I get this on server startup: failure: CORE3170:

Re: meanings of -lapr-0 -lgcc -lc -lsocket -lnsl in Makefile while building nsapi_redirector.so

2007-02-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jan 31, 2007, at 1:36 AM, Zack Grafton wrote: Maulik, In the line: LD_SHAREDCMD=ld -G -fPIC -lapr-0 -lgcc -lc -lsocket -lnsl I can't tell which one is bold, but anyway, that line specifies which linker command to use, and the -l options specify the loading of a library. You should

Re: Compiling mod-jk plugin for SunOne on Solaris

2007-02-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jan 31, 2007, at 7:30 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Try the following two files to compile. If this will work, we can find out how to automate them. common/jk_types.h: common/portable.h: All done. Fixed on trunk, I added --enable-netscape which allows configure to continue without requiring

Re: Compiling mod-jk plugin for SunOne on Solaris

2007-02-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
put the similar entry in httpd.conf ? Thanks Maulik Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/2007 09:28 PM Please respond to Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org To Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org cc Subject Re: Compiling mod-jk plugin for SunOne on Solaris On Jan 31, 2007

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 16, 2006, at 9:13 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Michael, I didn't want to shoot at you, and yes, mod_jk documentation could be much better. Assuming it's up to date :) - To start a new topic, e-mail:

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 15, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy? If you want to use mod_proxy, it is important to know, that most documentation for mod_proxy_balancer is contained in apaches

Re: load balancing with controlled failover

2006-11-01 Thread Jim Jagielski
This is expected to be added to the proxy module, but in a way which is more inline with expectations for a specific proxy server (whether serving ajp or http or anything else). On Nov 1, 2006, at 5:39 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Gary, from my understanding of the code mod_proxy(_balancer) at

Re: mod_jk 1.2.16 release candidate: ready to test

2006-07-07 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tomcat as a standalone webserver. Why not?

2006-06-03 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jun 2, 2006, at 12:27 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Web Servers are web servers primarily, focused on HTTP, compliance, speed and capability. Use the right tool for the right job :) Agreed. If you only need a web server, use a web server. I think that the question

Re: SSL with Tomcat and Apache..IE problems

2006-06-03 Thread Jim Jagielski
Another possible issue is the session cookie information, which IE has problems with when doing simple HTTP redirects. On May 27, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Rizwan Merchant wrote: We are running tomcat 5.5.16 on Fedora Core 4 OS. We just installed apache2.0 as a front to serve the pages using the

Re: Tomcat as a standalone webserver. Why not?

2006-06-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
IMO, if you need to move out of pure Java in your Java Web Server to get acceptable performance, then why use it in the first place? Plus, if you are concerned about the security of Apache (cause it's nasty C) and therefore want to use a Java Web Server, then using JNI means you've left that warm

Re: This page contains secure and non secure elements (was mod_jk : connection aborted or network problems, but apache and tomcat are on the same machine??)

2006-05-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
On May 8, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Francis Galiegue wrote: OK, I have some more information... The whole webapp is served through mod_ssl, as such (in the webapp specific config file): Not sure if this was already mentioned, but check to make sure that all resources are either relative or else

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 24, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Brad O'Hearne wrote: Question below: On Feb 24, 2006, at 2:05 AM, Bill Barker wrote: Brad O'Hearne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy_ajp? Yet another twist. Its just hard for me to believe that how do I integrate tomcat and

Re: mod_proxy_balancer: how to define failover (only)/hot standby behavior?

2006-01-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
Actually, dev@httpd.apache.org is best, since that is where the development of this module is being done. I have changed the email headers accordingly. A sort of warm standby is something that I had planned to work into the balancer code post 2.2.1. On Jan 24, 2006, at 11:14 AM, [EMAIL