Re: Small question on mod_jk load balancing methon "Next"

Am 09.08.2017 um 11:50 schrieb Martin Knoblauch: On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Martin, Am 04.08.2017 um 10:53 schrieb Martin Knoblauch: Hi, just need some clarification on the mod_jk load blanacing method "Next". The documentation states:

Re: Small question on mod_jk load balancing methon "Next"

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Am 04.08.2017 um 10:53 schrieb Martin Knoblauch: > >> Hi, >> >> just need some clarification on the mod_jk load blanacing method "Next". >> The documentation states: >> >> "If method is set to N[ext]

Re: Small question on mod_jk load balancing methon "Next"

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Martin, > > On 8/4/17 4:53 AM, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > just need some clarification on the mod_jk load blanacing method > > "Next".

Re: Small question on mod_jk load balancing methon "Next"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Martin, On 8/4/17 4:53 AM, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > Hi, > > just need some clarification on the mod_jk load blanacing method > "Next". The documentation states: > > "If method is set to N[ext] the balancer will again use the number > of sessions

Re: Small question on mod_jk load balancing methon "Next"

Hi Martin, Am 04.08.2017 um 10:53 schrieb Martin Knoblauch: Hi, just need some clarification on the mod_jk load blanacing method "Next". The documentation states: "If method is set to N[ext] the balancer will again use the number of sessions to find the best worker. All remarks concerning

Small question on mod_jk load balancing methon "Next"

Hi, just need some clarification on the mod_jk load blanacing method "Next". The documentation states: "If method is set to N[ext] the balancer will again use the number of sessions to find the best worker. All remarks concerning the Session method apply as well. The difference to the Session

mod_jk load balancing to Tomcats or SonicWall NetScaler?

Hello Good People - I'm trying to determine the best route in which to load balance multiple tomcats, what should I be taking into consideration when choosing between SonicWall's NetScaler or in continuing to use mod_jk? This question isn't meant to fuel a purchase decision as we have already

mod_jk load balancing method: Session vs Next

Hi, I'm reading the document about load balancing method of mod_jk workers.properties. However, I don't understand why Next is better than Session if numbers of sessions is small. How does the count reducing method affect an election of the best worker? Could anyone explain the theory?

Re: mod_jk load balancing problem

Shoaib M. Chaudhary schrieb am 27.01.2011 um 09:08 (+0500): When I use mod_jk with the following code for one worker it works fine but when I try to connect with two tomcat servers that are not on the same machine on which I have apache. Interestingly when I use one worker as localhost it

mod_jk load balancing problem

Hello, I am trying to use mod_jk with tomcat 5.5.3x. When I use mode_jk with one worker it works fine but when I use loadbalancer with two different tomcats the server doesn't response but always try to refresh the page. Can any one help me out please. Regards * Shoaib *

Re: mod_jk load balancing problem

Shoaib M. Chaudhary schrieb am 26.01.2011 um 15:48 (+0500): I am trying to use mod_jk with tomcat 5.5.3x. When I use mode_jk with one worker it works fine Okay. but when I use loadbalancer with two different tomcats the server doesn't response No response at all? Or some error status?

Re: mod_jk load balancing problem

The problem is following, When I use mod_jk with the following code for one worker it works fine but when I try to connect with two tomcat servers that are not on the same machine on which I have apache. Interestingly when I use one worker as localhost it works fine again. There is no error but

Re: mod_jk load balancing problem

Hello, The problem I detected is that client has to send three requests for home page as it contains frames. How can I force mod_jk to send all requests to one server. I come to this result while I shutdown one server called tomcat3 and restart a tomcat on that machine (tomcat3) with no

mod_jk - load balancing

Hi Guys! What is the behavior of mod_jk if one of the workers stops? Mod_jk stops to send requests to that worker? Or it retries at each request and only after determine that the worker is down , it sends the request to the fine worker ? # -- # Load Balancer worker #

RE: mod_jk - load balancing

of request. I believe the conclusion was that it would be possible to implement but not necessarily simple. Regards -Original Message- From: Andrew Hole [mailto:andremailingl...@gmail.com] Sent: 21 January 2009 11:14 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk - load balancing Hi Guys

Re: mod_jk load balancing and cluster node health

Nathan E. Pilling wrote: Is it possible to configure mod_jk to check node status by requesting a specific web application path to see if a cluster node is healthy (and should be included or excluded from the cluster)? I have a web application that runs across multiple tomcat instances and any

mod_jk load balancing and cluster node health

Is it possible to configure mod_jk to check node status by requesting a specific web application path to see if a cluster node is healthy (and should be included or excluded from the cluster)? I have a web application that runs across multiple tomcat instances and any request be processed by

Re: mod_jk load balancing intelligence

Eddie Yee wrote: Hi, We use a combination of Tomcat 5.5.25, mod_jk (v1.25) and sun one web server (v6.1).The Sun Java web server points to 5 instances of tomcat as specified in our obj.conf and worker.properties. I know that currently if the application is not in a started state and

Re: mod_jk load balancing intelligence

Mladen Turk schrieb: Eddie Yee wrote: Hi, We use a combination of Tomcat 5.5.25, mod_jk (v1.25) and sun one web server (v6.1).The Sun Java web server points to 5 instances of tomcat as specified in our obj.conf and worker.properties. I know that currently if the application is not

mod_jk load balancing intelligence

Hi, We use a combination of Tomcat 5.5.25, mod_jk (v1.25) and sun one web server (v6.1).The Sun Java web server points to 5 instances of tomcat as specified in our obj.conf and worker.properties. I know that currently if the application is not in a started state and Tomcat is up and

RE: mod_jk - load balancing

would appreciate if somebody could tell me what to put in every necessary file on apache, mod_jk conf and tomcat's server.xml. Thanks. Grega From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 4:43 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk - load

mod_jk - load balancing

Hi all, I'm trying to configure mod_jk as load balancer and I was not so successful so far. My environment architecture looks like this: 2 servers running each 3 instances of JBoss/tomcat Aplication server with ports 8080,8081 and 8082. Into each server instance I add AJP 13 protocol

Re: mod_jk - load balancing

Hello Gregor, did you configure jk_mounts in jk.conf ? They determine, what is passed on via the loadbalancer-worker to tomcat. Also, I dislike the idea to habe the same ajp-Port al all instances (or do they have different names?). Finally, do not forget to set the individual jvm_route on the

RE: mod_jk load balancing with SSL?

. - Sean -Original Message- From: Sean Neeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:34 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: mod_jk load balancing with SSL? Tim, Thank you. That was very helpful. It looks like your settings are very similar to mine. The difference

RE: mod_jk load balancing with SSL?

No one has ever done this? Help?! -Original Message- From: Sean Neeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 12:16 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: mod_jk load balancing with SSL? I'm using Apache Tomcat/5.5.15 and trying to get load balancing working with SSL

RE: mod_jk load balancing with SSL?

load balancing with SSL? No one has ever done this? Help?! -Original Message- From: Sean Neeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 12:16 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: mod_jk load balancing with SSL? I'm using Apache Tomcat/5.5.15 and trying to get

mod_jk load balancing with SSL?

I'm using Apache Tomcat/5.5.15 and trying to get load balancing working with SSL. Are there any tricks to this setup? I have two tomcat instances on one server, and I want to split sessions between them. I've set this up before without SSL on a different machine, but on this one particular

[Fwd: mod_jk load balancing problem]

I'm resubmitting this since we didn't get any response from the original posting. In the meantime, we've tried duplicating the problem in a non-production environment, but have been unsuccessful in reproducing the problem. The problem, again, is that users with established sessions on one of

mod_jk load balancing problem

We currently have the following setup: Two Tomcat servers and two Apache web servers using the JK connector to load balance the Tomcat servers. There is a Cisco PIX firewall between the Apache servers and the Tomcat servers, but we are using the keepalive option (see config below). Apache

MOD_JK load balancing algorithm?

MOD_JK documentation says that mod_jk is employing weighted round robin load balancing. However, if all workers are assigned weight of one I do not see exact round robin I would expect. I do not see uniform round robin distribution among peer servers I would expect to see. It seems that there

Re: MOD_JK load balancing algorithm?

Are you using sticky sessions? if you are using sticky sessions, the apache will route all the requests from the same user to the same server. this property is defined in worker.properties file. Thanks, Pankaj Edmon Begoli wrote: MOD_JK documentation says that mod_jk is employing weighted