Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread David Smith
?? Sun's Commercial Crap ?? What about http://tomcat.apache.org? --David Enrico Weigelt wrote: Hi folks, is there any chance to get tomcat working w/o sun's commercial crap ? I'm working on gentoo and can't tomcat it w/o going to the sun shop :(( cu

RE: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Enrico Weigelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap maybe I missed something, but tomcat requires several packages, ie. sun-jimi, which are NOT free (and cannot be downloaded directly). I guess you did miss something, since real Tomcat versions require

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread David Smith
: * Nelson, Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not sure what you mean by 'commercial crap', Java is OSS now, and Tomcat always has been. maybe I missed something, but tomcat requires several packages, ie. sun-jimi, which are NOT free (and cannot be downloaded directly). cu

RE: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Enrico Weigelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap So how would you suggest an clean tomcat installation on gentoo systems ? Rewrite the ebuilds and kickoff the dependencies ? As others have already suggested, throw away the junk that comes with gentoo

tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Enrico Weigelt
Hi folks, is there any chance to get tomcat working w/o sun's commercial crap ? I'm working on gentoo and can't tomcat it w/o going to the sun shop :(( cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service phone: +49

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Nelson, Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not sure what you mean by 'commercial crap', Java is OSS now, and Tomcat always has been. maybe I missed something, but tomcat requires several packages, ie. sun-jimi, which are NOT free (and cannot be downloaded directly). cu

RE: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Michael Hencin
Monica... -Original Message- From: Andrew Miehs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 10:29 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is this a troll? You will need some copy of Java to use

RE: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Jon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap Sounds like you might want to switch to Windows. Maybe that's more your speed. Insert knife, twist... - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread EDMOND KEMOKAI
working w/o sun's commercial crap ? I'm working on gentoo and can't tomcat it w/o going to the sun shop :(( cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de

RE: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Nelson, Tracy
Not sure what you mean by 'commercial crap', Java is OSS now, and Tomcat always has been. You might want to check out the Gentoo Java project: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/java/. Especially the Gentoo Tomcat Guide: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/java/tomcat-guide.xml. --- Tracy Nelson / Nelnet

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Andrew Miehs
you mean by 'commercial crap', Java is OSS now, and Tomcat always has been. maybe I missed something, but tomcat requires several packages, ie. sun-jimi, which are NOT free (and cannot be downloaded directly). -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Caldarale, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Enrico Weigelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap maybe I missed something, but tomcat requires several packages, ie. sun-jimi, which are NOT free (and cannot be downloaded directly). I guess you

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Enrico, Enrico Weigelt wrote: Hi folks, is there any chance to get tomcat working w/o sun's commercial crap ? ??! I'm working on gentoo and can't tomcat it w/o going to the sun shop :(( IIRC, when Gentoo upgraded to JDK 1.5.0, they removed

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Andrew Miehs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is this a troll? You will need some copy of Java to use Tomcat - either the JVM from Sun, IBM or Blackdown (which I think is based on Sun's) As for ?! commercial = crap ?! Glad to see you are using a free non- commercial machine to write

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* David Kerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Nope. I have had tomcat running for a couple of years with nothing but freely-available packages. Of there might be some different functionality you want to use that requires commercial packages, but I haven't run into one yet. on gentoo

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Owen Cumpson
I'll jump in here, I use Gentoo ~x86 (a bit racy, but hey) and Tomcat 5.5.20 installs without any non-free dependencies (that I could see). Looking in the Gentoo forums, a new ebuild for Tomcat had been released on 1st December to overcome a similar issue (maybe even the same as yours). Look

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Leon Rosenberg
On 12/5/06, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Caldarale, Charles R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Enrico Weigelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap maybe I missed something, but tomcat requires several packages, ie. sun-jimi, which are NOT free

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Just in case it's not clear, Enrico is asking about Tomcat on Gentoo specifically, and it looks like he'd prefer to use the package manager which is called portage. ACK. I've now spent the second day with trying to get it running. Seems

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Leon Rosenberg
On 12/5/06, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apparently, very few responders realized what you were asking. Just in case it's not clear, Enrico is asking about Tomcat on Gentoo specifically, and it looks like he'd prefer to use the package manager which is called portage. - -chris

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread David Kerber
it automatically. true for the jdk, but not lots of other sun-* packages required by the tomcat port (or axis), ie. sun-jimi, sun-javamail, ... Nope. I have had tomcat running for a couple of years with nothing but freely-available packages. Of there might be some different functionality you want

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Christopher Schultz
that requires commercial packages, but I haven't run into one yet. on gentoo ? How ? Apparently, very few responders realized what you were asking. Just in case it's not clear, Enrico is asking about Tomcat on Gentoo specifically, and it looks like he'd prefer to use the package manager which is called

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Jon Miller
Sounds like you might want to switch to Windows. Maybe that's more your speed. Jon - Original Message - From: Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 12:33 PM Subject: Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Owen Cumpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll jump in here, I use Gentoo ~x86 (a bit racy, but hey) and Tomcat 5.5.20 installs without any non-free dependencies (that I could see). Looking in the Gentoo forums, a new ebuild for Tomcat had been released on 1st December to overcome

RE: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Nelson, Tracy
| From: Owen Cumpson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Tuesday, 05 December, 2006 13:11 | | 1. Download and install yourself | or | 2. Use the Gentoo forums to find out the Gentoo installation is pulling | in those deps. FWIW, the Gentoo Tomcat Guide has a note that says Tomcat 5.x versions

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Enrico Weigelt
, but not lots of other sun-* packages required by the tomcat port (or axis), ie. sun-jimi, sun-javamail, ... There are also a handful of non-Sun JDKs available through portage. Try these packages instead: dev-java/blackdown-jdk dev-java/diablo-jdk dev-java/ibm-jdk-bin dev-java/jrockit-jdk

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Andrew Miehs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This however is a Gentoo packaging problem and not a user problem. If you want to get tomcat working as quickly as possible - download it directly from apache.org and IGNORE the gentoo packages. If you want it to work properly as a gentoo

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Enrico, Enrico Weigelt wrote: true for the jdk, but not lots of other sun-* packages required by the tomcat port (or axis), ie. sun-jimi, sun-javamail, ... Aah, I saw that afterward. I use Tomcat on Gentoo, but I don't use portage to install

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Owen Cumpson
Agreed. Ultimately a download/install gives you the most control and without more info I would say the same. It very much depends on your set-up, which versions of Java Tomcat that you wish to use, is it released or testing code?, etc. But still, installing Tomcat on Gentoo ~x86 (testing

RE: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread Nelson, Tracy
| -Original Message- | From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Tuesday, 05 December, 2006 11:13 | | The blackdown JDK is one of the oldest non-Sun JDKs available for Linux. | I believe that it is completely open source. Someone mentioned that | blackdown was based on

Re: tomcat w/o commercial crap

2006-12-05 Thread michael
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 09:06:43PM +0100, Leon Rosenberg wrote: On 12/5/06, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apparently, very few responders realized what you were asking. Just in case it's not clear, Enrico is asking about Tomcat on Gentoo specifically, and it looks like he'd

Re: [OT] [Fwd: TomEE Professional Support]

2013-11-13 Thread Tim Watts
? spam: n. Unsolicited email sent in bulk for commercial purposes. That I don't know you only makes it more spammy. there can and ought to be consequences. What do you mean? Doesn't Apache have some minimu standards for this? He seems to be a project committer, but hasn't contributed any

Re: [OT] [Fwd: TomEE Professional Support]

2013-11-13 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
for commercial purposes. That I don't know you only makes it more spammy. there can and ought to be consequences. What do you mean? Doesn't Apache have some minimu standards for this?  He seems to be a project committer, but hasn't contributed any code in about a year. I am PMC Chair