Strange Characters in MO Url from sms service

Hello All, I am seeing some odd characters in the HTTP call we are getting form smsbox for MOs. I expect the text from the phone to be: RE: Testing reply ---testing iden Here is the URL we are getting:

Windows on receiver links full (message queue full)

= /var/log/kannel/msg-store.db sms-incoming-queue-limit = 0 group = sms-service keyword-regex = .* catch-all = yes max-messages = 0 get-url = http://192.168.11.100/sms/mo.php?id=%Isc=%Pphone=%ptext=%ameta=%Ddt=%tunixts=%T Thank you for your help! Jeff -- Jeff Thorn Principal Software Architect

receiving DLRs too fast - how to throttle?

Hello Group, We are receiving DLRs from the SMSC faster than we can process them. Our setup is supposed to have 6 transmit binds and 4 receive binds. However, I just looked at status page showing all our binds and it looks like all 10 of our binds are receiving DLRs and they are coming in at a

Re: receiving DLRs too fast - how to throttle?

= xxx smsc-password = xxx system-type = address-range = source-addr-ton = 2 source-addr-npi = 1 dest-addr-ton = 2 dest-addr-npi = 1 enquire-link-interval = 30 msg-id-type = 0x03 I appreciate any help on this issue. Thanks! Jeff On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Jeff Thorn j

Re: receiving DLRs too fast - how to throttle?

It looks like setting receive-port=0 has no effect on DLRs. Is there any way to control which binds receive DLRs or to somehow control how fast they are received? On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Jeff Thorn j...@thorntechnologies.comwrote: If we are getting DRs faster than we can process them

Re: receiving DLRs too fast - how to throttle?

mode, thus it should stop receiving DLRs. 2013/11/27 Jeff Thorn j...@thorntechnologies.com It looks like setting receive-port=0 has no effect on DLRs. Is there any way to control which binds receive DLRs or to somehow control how fast they are received? On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:15 AM

Re: receiving DLRs too fast - how to throttle?

. On Nov 27, 2013 8:15 PM, Jeff Thorn j...@thorntechnologies.com wrote: Thanks for the response. In my scenario, we want to be able to send as fast as possible. We are regularly submitting MTs at a rate of 200 / second. We get DLRs at a rate of 1.5 - 2 times this (300 - 400 / second). This makes sense

Re: receiving DLRs too fast - how to throttle?

with this. We are definitely doing a considerable volume. We do report the status of 8s. So I am thinking I may need to tune the mysql dlr database. On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:32 PM, spameden spame...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/11/27 Jeff Thorn j...@thorntechnologies.com The documentation says

Re: receiving DLRs too fast - how to throttle?

: 2013/11/27 Jeff Thorn j...@thorntechnologies.com I see. So does that mean the the DLRs I am seeing on the transmit binds are only status 8s? Would the volume of 8 messages impact the sending of other status from the SMSC? I am trying to understand the cause of the error from the operator

Re: receiving DLRs too fast - how to throttle?

, spameden spame...@gmail.com wrote: Most likely that's because you set receiver-port = 0. Check your smsc log as well and post here any errors you find. 2013/11/27 Jeff Thorn j...@thorntechnologies.com The SMSC Operator said they were getting Window on receiver link full errors from

Re: troubleshooting MT queuing in Kannel / MT queue persistence question

, spameden spame...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-03-11 22:46 GMT+04:00 Jeff Thorn j...@thorntechnologies.com: Hi group, We currently have 7 different Tx binds setup to our SMSC. We have been sending MT volumes of up to 3,000,000 messages per day at a rate of almost 200 / second. We've been doing

Re: troubleshooting MT queuing in Kannel / MT queue persistence question

though there are older messages queued, can you briefly explain the logic that kannel uses to determine whether a message should be queued or sent right away? Thanks, Jeff On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:02 AM, spameden spame...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-03-11 23:48 GMT+04:00 Jeff Thorn j

coding=0 vs coding=1

We've been using kannel for a very long time, sending messages with the default coding value of 0. We just received a complaint that underscore characters are not appearing in messages which I believe is a known issue with the GSM7 charset. I am trying to understand the impact of moving from a

Re: coding=0 vs coding=1

Just wanted to follow up on this question. What is the impact of moving from coding=0 to coding=1 for all MT messages? Do we risk some handsets not being able to view the message? Thanks! Jeff Jeff Thorn Principal Software Architect Thorn Technologies, LLC (410) 429-0255 www.thorntech.com

ERROR due to Delivery Reports from different smsc-id

We are seeing an increased number of error messages like the following: ERROR: SMPP[bind-b]: got DLR but could not find message or was not interested in it idxx dstxxx, type1 We have a number of binds setup to handle bulk messaging (which may queue in kannel) or interactive messaging

Re: ERROR due to Delivery Reports from different smsc-id

I've searched the user groups for this issue and everyone says to use the same smsc-id. We specifically need different smsc-ids so our interactive messages can be delivered in real time. On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Jeff Thorn j...@thorntechnologies.comwrote: We are seeing an increased

Re: ERROR due to Delivery Reports from different smsc-id

on the same smsc-id that the message was sent from? Otherwise, I don't understand why there is an option to specify different smsc-ids. Thanks! On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Jeff Thorn j...@thorntechnologies.comwrote: We are seeing an increased number of error messages like the following: ERROR

Re: ERROR due to Delivery Reports from different smsc-id

AM, spameden spame...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-04-24 1:20 GMT+04:00 Jeff Thorn j...@thorntechnologies.com: I've searched the user groups for this issue and everyone says to use the same smsc-id. We specifically need different smsc-ids so our interactive messages can be delivered in real time

Re: ERROR due to Delivery Reports from different smsc-id

so that you can start/stop/whatever each bind individually Regards On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Jeff Thorn j...@thorntechnologies.com wrote: Thanks for the response spamden. That is very unfortunate. We have a legitimate need to have different smsc-ids but have only one account. How

deliver_sm_resp status if get-url is down?

Hi group, What does kannel report to SMSC if it cannot hit the URL specified in the get-url of the kannel sms-service configuration? More specifically - what status does kannel deliver to SMSC in DELIVER_SM_RESP pdu if the sms-service get-url is unavailable? Does it report an error back to the

impact of bearerbox running without smsbox

Hello, We had a instance of the bearerbox running for a few hours without smsbox running. Looks like we had a number of incoming message (deliver_sm) attempts. The logs show this (several times): WARNING: smsbox_list empty! WARNING: incoming messages queue too long, dropping a message WARNING:

Re: impact of bearerbox running without smsbox

, 2015 10:38 PM, "spameden" <spame...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2015-10-01 5:23 GMT+03:00 Jeff Thorn <j...@thorntechnologies.com>: > >> Hello, >> We had a instance of the bearerbox running for a few hours without smsbox >> running. Looks like we had a

RE: Kannel TPS reduces gradually if DLR is used

Are you storing dlrs in a database? Without the proper indexes it performance will definitely degrade as it takes longer and longer to look up the dlr. Kannel doesn't optimize the dlr database. You need to do that. On Apr 24, 2016 5:55 AM, "Nanda Kumar P" wrote: > Thanks

what to do with store.bak file after Kannel crash?

Hello Group, I just experienced a very rare crash of Kannel. We are using the following settings for store type: store-type = file store-location = /var/log/kannel/msg-store.db After restarting everything, I noticed a very large (3 GB) msg-store.db.bak file. Kannel took several minutes to

Re: Issue in sending long sms emojis

We have noticed the same issue. My guess is that since emojis are multi byte characters the message is getting split mid emoji. For the time being, we have a policy not to put an emoji character around the 36 character position. On Dec 13, 2016 1:21 AM, "Manas Mohanty"

Re: web server information disclosure vulnerability

We always proxy kannel with Apache or Nginx. That should resolve your issue. Jeff Jeff Thorn CEO / Principal Software Architect Thorn Technologies, LLC www.thorntech.com @thorntech <http://twitter.com/thorntech> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffthorn> | Fa

SMS command_status for long MT messages

lit, the %A parameter in the DLR url looks like this: NACK/ Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks! Jeff Thorn CEO / Principal Software Architect Thorn Technologies, LLC www.thorntech.com @thorntech <http://twitter.com/thorntech> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffthorn> |

Re: SMS command_status for long MT messages

Hi Alex, Thanks for explaining, makes sense. The most common status we get is invalid destination address (0x000b). In this case all 3 parts in your example would have the same status. Would it make sense to include the status of it was the same for all parts? Jeff Thorn CEO Thorn

Re: Any solution for MMS?

info. Jeff Thorn CEO Thorn Technologies, LLC https://www.thorntech.com On Dec 20, 2017 8:38 PM, "Arya F" <arya6...@gmail.com> wrote: > There was the Mbuni project, but it looks like it's dead at this point, > the latest release is from 2011 and I read reports online that i

bug? command_status field (%A) missing in DLR of split messages

like this: NACK/ Is this a known issue? Is there a fix for this? Thanks, Jeff Thorn

Re: bug? command_status field (%A) missing in DLR of split messages

Hi Kannel Users, I wanted to follow up on this issue I reported last week. Has anyone seen this before? I am having trouble getting the command_status field (%A) in my dlrs if the original MT message was a long sms message. Thanks, Jeff Jeff Thorn CEO / Principal Software Architect Thorn

Re: Kannel delivering MT in LIFO

s. Maybe someone can elaborate on that local caching logic. Jeff Thorn CEO Thorn Technologies, LLC https://www.thorntech.com On Sat, Oct 19, 2019, 12:15 PM Rene Kluwen wrote: > Your observaction is a bit “odd” in the sense that by nature, Kannel > should send messages FIFO. > > > > Th

what happens if kannel cannot store dlr?

We are using Redis for our DLR store. If there is an issue with the Redis database and kannel cannot save the DLR info, does the MT request get sent anyway or does the whole request fail? Thanks! Jeff Thorn CEO Thorn Technologies, LLC www.thorntech.com @thorntech <http://twitter.com/thornt

Re: Temporary message store for multi-part SMSs

than MOs. We queue the DLRs and process them asynchronously at our own pace so the one kannel server with receive binds doesn't get bogged down. Hope this helps. Jeff Thorn CEO Thorn Technologies, LLC https://www.thorntech.com On Sun, Mar 29, 2020, 3:49 PM Antony Stone < antony

Re: Pipe Symbol Issue

kannel.org/download/1.5.0/userguide-1.5.0/userguide.html#AEN4623 Jeff Thorn CEO Thorn Technologies, LLC www.thorntech.com @thorntech <http://twitter.com/thorntech> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffthorn> | Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/thorntechnologies> On Tue, Aug 18,