Re: rat:check bad default?

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > just wondering, are both plugins part of the effective pom? > When using a plugin prefix like "rat", Maven should first go over all > plugins and verify if the prefix matches. > Ensuring that org.apache.rat is

Re: rat:check bad default?

Hi, just wondering, are both plugins part of the effective pom? When using a plugin prefix like "rat", Maven should first go over all plugins and verify if the prefix matches. Ensuring that org.apache.rat is above org.codehaus.mojo should help. thanks, Robert On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 19:48:08

Re: rat:check bad default?

AFAIK, That can't be in pom, only settings, and there are many people who would have to deal with this. Is the problem just that org.codehaus.mojo is set up in the superpom as a popular destination? On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:10 PM, John Patrick wrote: > Does this help?

Re: rat:check bad default?

Does this help? https://maven.apache.org/settings.html#Plugin_Groups Maybe something like this... org.apache.maven.plugins org.apache.rat org.mojohaus.mojo org.codehaus.mojo With codehaus dead, either moved to github or mojohaus, the scan ordering might need to be changed for future releases.