The last paragraph is troubling. The same group has "used the wrong gas
constant" before. This seems like it is the kind of mistake you wish to be
careful to not repeat. However, it is also a consequence of using "naked
numbers." If you do calculations without the units appended to your
Respectfully disagree, and I earlier posited that it was energy per unit length
of the bolt. In electrical and magnetic fields, line sources are frequently
assumed as an approximation. Of course, real sources would tend to have a
diameter, but for distances large compared to diameter, but
It might be the energy dissipated in air by the arc. Once the arc is struck,
the voltage drop (per meter) is relatively low, MUCH less than the initial
brekdown voltage.
From: Stanislav Jakuba
To: U.S. Metric Association
Sent: Wednesday,
I think the answer is yes. The text of the FPLA (and FTC regulations) is given
on the metric laws page of the USMA website. Whats covered is in section 1459
of the FPLA.
If it is not covered by the FPLA, it would fall under UPLR. Unfortunately UPLR
is only model regulations. Many states
I bought mine online but B stores like Williams Sonoma, Sur La Table
definitely carry them. Also plenty of articles about professional chefs using
weight, but MOST American recipes are volume-based and many people don't see
the need. If you wanted one, there is no problem finding a large
The simple answer is "have a scale."
But for those who enjoy mind-numbing conversions, you could look up the nominal
weight (and range?) for each grade of egg, the nominal densities of flour and
sugar, and convert it all to volumetric. You'd have a few recipes, depending
on what size egg you
In the US, I would say relatively rare. It would almost require some special
interest, portion control for diabetes or weigh loss, interest in cooking
"foreign" recipes, etc. If the household has one, it is likely to be a spring
type, and moderate capacity to determine cooking times for large
Martin,
The TTB (responsible agency) had proposed a unit of alcohol equal to 0.5 US fl
oz (computed from % alcohol by volume). If you allow for minor rounding, about
15 mL or 12 g of pure ethanol. It never was officially approved but seems to
have some informal use treating the 3 possible
I was actually expecting that Canadians get metric instructions and was
wondering why they couldn't be made available here.However, since Imperial
gallons have 160 fl oz, not 128, the mixing directions would have to be
different in Imperial (1.875 Imp fl oz per Imp gallon)
From: Martin
I wonder what instructions they use in Canada?
I would have said 12 and 20 mL/L, but close enough.
From: Harry Wyeth
To: USMA Disc
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 11:05 PM
Subject: [USMA 183] Monsanto Roundup mixing
So many times I get teed
In the Preface to the SI Brochure, the BIPM notes that THEY use the point as
the decimal marker in the English text and the comma in the French text (the
only two languages they support).
I think the logical conclusion is that the English language and
English-speaking countries use the point,
Question 6 is no piece of cake. All three should be compulsory for BWMA, ARM,
ACWM and the like. No true Imperialist would fail to answer correctly.
I would get "epic fail" on the Latin, Greek, History & Geography. With
resources (open book exam), I could hack my way through the math
Lengthy discussion on metric reddit. The IAAF is now accepting mile qualifying
times to run the 1500 m at world championship level, and USATF accepts them by
appeal only for US Olympic Trials. At most only the mile and 1500 m are
affected.
However, athletes feel running the mile is
Might be tough, the IAAF recognizes and sponsors mile events, just not at the
World Championships (The Olympics does not). The IAAF also shows a mile
starting line on its diagram of a standard 400 m track layout, with details for
all starting points, relay zones, steeplechase details etc. The
I took it directly from the article, but I was not able to "fact check" it (I
hope the reporter did), as I couldn't find the Federal rule; I did try.
Remember that USDA, not FDA, regulates meat. I was surprised that NOAA
regulates fish, but I did find a source to confirm that. Given that
The following are helpful but none directly answer the question. Tuna producers
petitioned for "drained weight" years ago, but "nada"
happened:http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dailys/00/Sep00/090100/c56.pdf
NOAA is involved and this touches on drained weight, but as a basis for meeting
I'm a little surprised the Feds only require 2.84 oz in a 5 oz can (56.8%).
This strikes me as a product that should be sold by drained weight as nobody
uses that water. In Canada, it IS. A little Googling shows that Safeway
Canada sells a roughly 6 oz can, labeled 170 g net weight, 120 g
If it were water, 2 teaspoons would be close to 10 g. However, coffee grinds
have a much lower bulk density than water. Peet's is likely close on 2 T = 10
g. However, the ratio also depends on how you brew the coffee (and personal
preference). Most people use drip machines, and that is way
Al: On beer, TTB requires net contents in Customary. Metric is allowed, but
only as supplemental. It is the reverse of wine and spirits. TTB swings both
ways.
I believe TTB did work with industry rather than just declare wine and spirits
metric, beer Customary, but I can't find any details
Hi Pat,
We will probably remain on opposite sides of this issue, but a few thoughts:
On page 3, you assert Congress has never spoken on the spelling issues. On
other pages you recognize they did in the Metric Act of 1866. That was
obviously a long time ago. However, I would assert they
20 matches
Mail list logo