[USMA 310] Re: Fahrenheit-Celsius Both Flawed

I agree. Here is a thermometer pic from the internet that I edited. John Altounji One size does not fit all. Social promotion ruined Education. http://bit.do/tounj From: USMA [mailto:usma-boun...@colostate.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Henschel Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 6:21 PM To: Kaimbridge

[USMA 306] Re: Fahrenheit-Celsius Both Flawed

Good luck with selling that to the rest of the world. And all for marginal benefit (if in fact there is any practical benefit at all). -Original Message- From: Kaimbridge M. GoldChild Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 9:05 PM To: US Metric Assn M Subject: [USMA 303] Fahrenheit-Celsius

[USMA 307] Re: Fahrenheit-Celsius Both Flawed

I agree. People who are technically correct make it seem complicated and confusing and are counterproductive when it comes to the real world and when promoting the metric system Al Lawrence From: USMA on behalf of Mark

[USMA 309] Re: Fahrenheit-Celsius Both Flawed

On Wednesday, August 31, 2016 20:05:27 Kaimbridge M. GoldChild wrote: > In terms of temperature measurement, it would seem that both the > Fahrenheit *and* Celsius scales are flawed. > In angle measurement, there is the raw radian—where 1 radian > along a circleʼs circumference equals its

[USMA 308] Re: Fahrenheit-Celsius Both Flawed

I think that you are starting from a false premise: There are two modern temperature scales in use today, both based on angle measurement... Jim On 2016-08-31 15:05, Kaimbridge M. GoldChild wrote: In terms of temperature measurement, it would seem that both the Fahrenheit *and* Celsius