Re: [vchkpw] Re: strange behavior in from header.

2004-05-01 Thread Sebastien FOUTREL
Peter Palmreuther wrote: Hello Sebastien, On Friday, April 30, 2004 at 11:43:40 PM you wrote (at least in part): I tried many configurations and it appears that it's the vchkpw that adds my email adress to my IP when I send a mail. I wouldn't know why and how vchkpw would or could do

Re: [vchkpw] strange behavior in from header.

2004-05-01 Thread Sebastien FOUTREL
The problem is not coming from the mail client. I tried many clients and the problem is only there if I use vpopmail on the server. btw, the problem is not in the to or from lines but in the received from lines. example : from unknown (HELO tinozaure) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@81.57.236.165) by

[vchkpw] Re: strange behavior in from header.

2004-05-01 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Sebastien, On Saturday, May 1, 2004 at 6:02:00 PM you wrote (at least in part): I tried many configurations and it appears that it's the vchkpw that adds my email adress to my IP when I send a mail. I wouldn't know why and how vchkpw would or could do this. First of all I tried with or

Re: [vchkpw] Re: strange behavior in from header.

2004-05-01 Thread Sebastien FOUTREL
I tried without the SMTP AUTH Patch so I recompiled the netqmail-1.05, remove the vchkpw part from the qmail-smtpd/run file, then tried my qmail server and it worked without adding the @IP I forgot to mention maildrop-1.6.3 that I use also but I don't thing it is part of the problem. I did not

Re: [vchkpw] strange behavior in from header.

2004-05-01 Thread Tom Collins
On May 1, 2004, at 9:08 AM, Sebastien FOUTREL wrote: The problem is not coming from the mail client. I tried many clients and the problem is only there if I use vpopmail on the server. btw, the problem is not in the to or from lines but in the received from lines. example : from unknown (HELO

Re: [vchkpw] strange behavior in from header.

2004-05-01 Thread Sebastien FOUTREL
The problem is that some ISP found this as non conform data and reject mails. And AFAIK it's not conform to RFC. Tom Collins wrote: On May 1, 2004, at 9:08 AM, Sebastien FOUTREL wrote: The problem is not coming from the mail client. I tried many clients and the problem is only there if I use

Re: [vchkpw] strange behavior in from header.

2004-05-01 Thread Tom Collins
On May 1, 2004, at 1:49 PM, Sebastien FOUTREL wrote: The problem is that some ISP found this as non conform data and reject mails. And AFAIK it's not conform to RFC. AFAIK, Received headers allow for almost anything in parenthesis. I went back and re-read your original post, and there's nothing

Re: [vchkpw] strange behavior in from header.

2004-05-01 Thread Sebastien FOUTREL
I tried 2 times to send tests emails to my own email address @ one major ISP in France and received each time a bounced message with error 500 content rejected. Apart from the @IP the rest is correct. this is a copy of the bounced message : Hi. This is the qmail-send program at

Re: [vchkpw] strange behavior in from header.

2004-05-01 Thread Kit Halsted
Wanadoo is sort of a pet peeve of mine. I don't interact with them much, but every time I do it's a big headache. They don't seem to care much about standards only seem to be good at breaking things in interesting ways. In my experience, at least, they make AOL look competent. -Kit At 1:05