[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-62) New empty interfaces that allow one to enforce the scope of a tool

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-62?page=comments#action_12435391 ] Claude Brisson commented on VELTOOLS-62: I understand your point and you're right, annotations would perfectly answer this need. Since we can live

Re: svn commit: r447142 - in /jakarta/velocity/engine/trunk/src/java/org/apache/velocity/runtime: ./ parser/node/

Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually Eclipse bothers if you set Javadoc checking to Error. :-) This was more of an automated linting process. Do, I don't mind. However, it would be nice to get Javadocs for at least the public members and methods of a class. Best regards

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-62) New empty interfaces that allow one to enforce the scope of a tool

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-62?page=comments#action_12435425 ] Henning Schmiedehausen commented on VELTOOLS-62: I'm also no longer fond of marker interfaces; Spring showed the right approach here. We could

Re: release occurred?

Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: just velocity jar, velocity with dependencies jar and full distribution containing source and binary in .tar.gz and .zip flavor. That what falls out if you run ant package. :-) Best regards Henning Did we make a binary or

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-velocity-test (in module jakarta-velocity) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-velocity-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-velocity-test (in module jakarta-velocity) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-velocity-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-62) New empty interfaces that allow one to enforce the scope of a tool

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-62?page=comments#action_12435453 ] Claude Brisson commented on VELTOOLS-62: Tools are meant to be reusable, while each webapp coder writes its toolbox file. Even if you are supposed to

[jira] Created: (VELTOOLS-63) webapp.resource.loader.extension property that gives a mandatory extension to add to resource names

webapp.resource.loader.extension property that gives a mandatory extension to add to resource names --- Key: VELTOOLS-63 URL:

[jira] Updated: (VELTOOLS-63) webapp.resource.loader.extension property that gives a mandatory extension to add to resource names

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-63?page=all ] Claude Brisson updated VELTOOLS-63: --- Attachment: WebappLoader.patch webapp.resource.loader.extension property that gives a mandatory extension to add to resource names

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-62) New empty interfaces that allow one to enforce the scope of a tool

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-62?page=comments#action_12435497 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-62: -- To overlap with Claude's answer to Henning.. For VelocityTools, scope doesn't really refer to the scope of a tool's

Re: release occurred?

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Nathan Bubna wrote: Since it is only a beta release, i don't believe we should mirror it. That is, unless we really think it will be a big hit on ASF infrastructure to not mirror it. So i don't think this should be on the download page. It should, however, probably be

Re: release occurred?

Nice job writing this up. I'm impressed with the detail. WILL On 9/18/06, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's a beta and it is available from http://cvs.apache.org/dist/jakarta/velocity/ as described here: