[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-velocity-test (in module jakarta-velocity) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-velocity-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-velocity-test (in module jakarta-velocity) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-velocity-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[jira] Updated: (VELOCITY-460) the IncludeRelativePath handler should treat paths beginning with a slash as absolute paths

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-460?page=all ] Claude Brisson updated VELOCITY-460: Attachment: IncludeRelativePath.patch.v2 New version of the patch, which includes test cases. the IncludeRelativePath handler should treat paths

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-460) the IncludeRelativePath handler should treat paths beginning with a slash as absolute paths

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-460?page=comments#action_12437670 ] Will Glass-Husain commented on VELOCITY-460: Ant test failed. Did you forget to include BuiltInEventHandlerTestCase? Testsuite:

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

To me, the vote to go TLP is done. I appreciate the respect and deference though. As for the -1, that's about the charter we'd propose to the board, and we still have a month, so I'm sure we'll come to consensus easily. geir Nathan Bubna wrote: On 9/23/06, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

Great. I've a message in draft on the charter, but will send that after this one. So there's no confusion, Nathan - maybe you should resend the vote count to general noting the TLP vote is really closed and all -1's are resolved? Cheers, WILL On 9/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

Sure. Geir, should i put you down as +1 or +0 on the TLP vote? On 9/25/06, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Great. I've a message in draft on the charter, but will send that after this one. So there's no confusion, Nathan - maybe you should resend the vote count to general noting

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-460) the IncludeRelativePath handler should treat paths beginning with a slash as absolute paths

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-460?page=comments#action_12437702 ] Will Glass-Husain commented on VELOCITY-460: I'm on Windows. Let me tinker with this tonight. the IncludeRelativePath handler should treat paths

Re: [RESULT] Move Velocity to TLP

By the way, Click is an interesting case study for eventual TLP inclusion. Click is an innovative approach to web frameworks with an active community.The lead developer (Malcolm Edgar) has been actively participating on the velocity lists and supplying patches. There's a good

Re: projects under TLP umbrella

+1 for Click as a Web framework Then I can start work on my evil reverse take over plan, heh, heh heh.. Ops did I say that out loud. On 9/26/06, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Starting a new thread... First, project characteristics. I'd argue that a good project for the TLP would

Re: projects under TLP umbrella

On 9/25/06, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Starting a new thread... First, project characteristics. I'd argue that a good project for the TLP would have -- developers who are part of the Velocity community (either active on the mailing lists, and better yet those who have