RFC: bigger '--with-features' than huge (incl interpreters)

2006-09-08 Thread Yakov Lerner
Hello, The biggest build size that exists now (the --with-features) is 'huge'. This 'huge' still does not include interpreters. What does public and Bram think about adding another build size ('extra-huge') that includes [all] interpreters ? What is your feeback ? Yakov Possible namings:

Re: RFC: bigger '--with-features' than huge (incl interpreters)

2006-09-08 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Yakov Lerner wrote: Hello, The biggest build size that exists now (the --with-features) is 'huge'. This 'huge' still does not include interpreters. What does public and Bram think about adding another build size ('extra-huge') that includes [all] interpreters ? What is your feeback ? Yakov

Hello! Well Met! And a possible bug. :-)

2006-09-08 Thread Mark Manning
I believe I may have found an obscure bug. It is not a harmful bug. It does not make VIM crash or do weird things. (Well, sort-of.) :-) Here is how to reproduce it: First you have to have a lot of open and close braces (}). They do not have to be on the same line and in fact,

Re: Hello! Well Met! And a possible bug. :-)

2006-09-08 Thread Yakov Lerner
On 9/8/06, Mark Manning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe I may have found an obscure bug. It is not a harmful bug. It does not make VIM crash or do weird things. (Well, sort-of.) :-) Here is how to reproduce it: First you have to have a lot of open and close braces (}). They do

Re: Hello! Well Met! And a possible bug. :-)

2006-09-08 Thread Charles E Campbell Jr
Mark Manning wrote: First you have to have a lot of open and close braces (}). ..snip.. Ok. So the problem happens when you delete sub b and then hit the dd key to delete the blank line between sub a's ending close brace and where sub b's starting line was. When you do this VIM

Re: Patch 7.0.082

2006-09-08 Thread Hari Krishna Dara
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 at 5:19pm, Hari Krishna Dara wrote: On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 at 9:50pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Hari Krishna Dara wrote: I wrote: Patch 7.0.082 Problem:Calling a function that waits for input may cause List and Dictionary arguments to be

Re: Patch 7.0.082

2006-09-08 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Hari Krishna Dara wrote: Hmm, now that I think of it you could get problems with a command like this: :echo [1, 2, 3, ..., 2000] If you get the more prompt the garbage collector might delete the list before it's completely echoed. I'll look into that. This is probably

Re: Vimdiff Oddity

2006-09-08 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Bill McCarthy wrote: To better understand what vimdiff is doing (and why it is so slow), I had my shell (4NT under WinXP) keep a log showing me just what was requested. [Note: I use '!' instead of '' for redirection because my 4NT is set to not overwrite existing files unless explicitly

Re: Patch 7.0.082

2006-09-08 Thread Hari Krishna Dara
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 at 11:11pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Hari Krishna Dara wrote: Hmm, now that I think of it you could get problems with a command like this: :echo [1, 2, 3, ..., 2000] If you get the more prompt the garbage collector might delete the list

Re: parsing error with ?: usage

2006-09-08 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Hari Krishna Dara wrote: I have hit this thrice already, while using the ?: ternary operator, in some conditions, you are forced to put whitespace to separate the operator otherwise Vim gets confused. Here is something that fails: let direction = (a:0?a:1:1) I had this issue before

Re: enabling interpreters in ./configure (build)

2006-09-08 Thread Yakov Lerner
On 9/8/06, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yakov Lerner wrote: I have this question. Let's say my comp has no perl installed, no python, and no ruby. I invoke ./configure, on this comp, as follows: ./configure ---enable-perlinterp --enable-pythoninterp --enable-rubyinterp What

RFC: bigger '--with-features' than huge (incl interpreters)

2006-09-08 Thread Yakov Lerner
Hello, The biggest build size that exists now (the --with-features) is 'huge'. This 'huge' still does not include interpreters. What does public and Bram think about adding another build size ('extra-huge') that includes [all] interpreters ? What is your feeback ? Yakov Possible namings:

Re: RFC: bigger '--with-features' than huge (incl interpreters)

2006-09-08 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Yakov Lerner wrote: Hello, The biggest build size that exists now (the --with-features) is 'huge'. This 'huge' still does not include interpreters. What does public and Bram think about adding another build size ('extra-huge') that includes [all] interpreters ? What is your feeback ? Yakov

Re: +clientserver on Mac OS X

2006-09-08 Thread Benjamin Esham
A.J.Mechelynck wrote: Now, there does exist an X11 server for Mac Os X but I've heard some Mac users don't want to use it because (I've been told) applications running through the X server are not visible as distinct running Mac applications. This is true. It's possible to run X11 apps,

Specifying vim options in the files being edited

2006-09-08 Thread Aaron Johnson
List, How can I include vim settings in the files I'm editing? For example, if system wide I have syntax highlighting disabled but I want to enable it just for one particular file. For c code I'd like to be able to include something like this: /* * ?:syntax on */ It would have to always

RE: Specifying vim options in the files being edited

2006-09-08 Thread Steve Hall
From: Aaron Johnson, Fri, September 08, 2006 1:32 pm How can I include vim settings in the files I'm editing? For example, if system wide I have syntax highlighting disabled but I want to enable it just for one particular file. For c code I'd like to be able to include something like this:

Re: Specifying vim options in the files being edited

2006-09-08 Thread Russell Bateman
Just in case my answer will get you going a little quicker (because I've always found vim help useful, but it's a lot more useful to those who already know--I've scratched my head and had to experiment a lot for even simple things)... You can put these modelines at the top of your file or the

Re: Specifying vim options in the files being edited

2006-09-08 Thread Jean-Rene David
* Russell Bateman [2006.09.08 15:30]: You see that pretty well anything you can do on the ex command line in Vim (:set ignorecase, etc.), you can put in these modelines. That's not true. You can only set options. Excerpt from :help modeline: No other commands than set are supported, for

Re: Specifying vim options in the files being edited

2006-09-08 Thread Charles E Campbell Jr
Russell Bateman wrote: You can put these modelines at the top of your file or the bottom. Also, they can go on other lines, but I think there's a limit there and yet another setting to change how tolerant Vim is in looking for them, but as this approach suits me, I haven't experimented a

Spell checking comments and strings

2006-09-08 Thread Noah Spurrier
Is there a way to spell-check strings and comments using vim7.0 ? This is for Python in particular, but doing this in any language would be useful. Yours Noah

Re: bug in taglist() and filename

2006-09-08 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Hari Krishna Dara wrote: When taglist() returns matches, each match is hash and the filename key gives the filename where the tag is expected to be found. This works as expected, but the problem is that the filename is returned as it is found in the tags file, which could be a relative path

Re: Specifying vim options in the files being edited

2006-09-08 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Aaron Johnson wrote: List, How can I include vim settings in the files I'm editing? For example, if system wide I have syntax highlighting disabled but I want to enable it just for one particular file. For c code I'd like to be able to include something like this: /* * ?:syntax on */ It

Re: glob() and |file-pattern|

2006-09-08 Thread Hari Krishna Dara
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 at 9:24am, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Hari Krishna Dara wrote: I asked a couple of questions below, but I solved the last one ('ignorecse') by implementing a filter() myself, so it is not an issue. The other question is on why {} works on win32 GVIM (7.0 version compiled

Re: Spell checking comments and strings

2006-09-08 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Noah Spurrier wrote: Is there a way to spell-check strings and comments using vim7.0 ? This is for Python in particular, but doing this in any language would be useful. Yours Noah Well, spell-checking some parts of files and not others is possible *provided* that syntax highlighting is

RE: changing text into binary?

2006-09-08 Thread Max Dyckhoff
What do you mean by the actual bytes? Do you mean something like this: ff - At any rate, I think you would be best suited to use Perl/awk/sed to do the conversion, rather than using vim. Vim is for editing text, not manipulating data! :) Max -Original Message-

Re: changing text into binary?

2006-09-08 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Chuck Mason wrote: I've a text file with hundreds of thousands of hex numbers, i.e.: ff 03 04 ab 30 ab 03 41 ... ... ... ff 03 04 ab 30 ... all in plain ascii text. I'm looking for a switch that could change it into the actual bytes those numbers represent. Any ideas, without having to

Re: parsing error with ?: usage

2006-09-08 Thread Hari Krishna Dara
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 at 6:08am, A.J.Mechelynck wrote: Hari Krishna Dara wrote: [...] I know that this is possible, but as I said previously, it is a force of habit to compact as much as possible in some situations, though I normally prefer using whitespace and parenthesis to improve

Re: Thank you for Vim7 scripting improvements

2006-09-08 Thread Hari Krishna Dara
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 at 7:09pm, A.J.Mechelynck wrote: Hari Krishna Dara wrote: On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 at 2:23pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Yakov Lerner wrote: On 9/3/06, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I still miss pre and post increment and decrement operators (avoids a separate

Re: changing text into binary?

2006-09-08 Thread Tim Chase
ff 03 04 ab 30 ab 03 41 ... ... ... ff 03 04 ab 30 ... all in plain ascii text. I'm looking for a switch that could change it into the actual bytes those numbers represent. Any ideas, without having to write a program for it? The others gave sensible solutions. However, if you *must* do

Re: vimdiff functionality

2006-09-08 Thread Hari Krishna Dara
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 at 11:55am, Lev Lvovsky wrote: I'm using a version control app called darcs, which allows me to view a diff hunk by hunk, to pick and choose the changes that I want to apply. darcs aside, is there an in-depth howto for editing patches and such? Specifically, I'm looking

Re: Specifying vim options in the files being edited

2006-09-08 Thread Luc Hermitte
Hello, * On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 04:27:54PM -0400, Jean-Rene David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Russell Bateman [2006.09.08 15:30]: You see that pretty well anything you can do on the ex command line in Vim (:set ignorecase, etc.), you can put in these modelines. That's not true. You

Re: Spell checking comments and strings

2006-09-08 Thread Luc Hermitte
Hello, * On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 12:07:19AM +0200, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Noah Spurrier wrote: Is there a way to spell-check strings and comments using vim7.0 ? Well, spell-checking some parts of files and not others is possible *provided* that syntax highlighting is

ole in eclipse

2006-09-08 Thread Mark Palmer
Does any one know how to open vim (any version) from eclipse as a ole component, or bonobo? -mark

Re: ole in eclipse

2006-09-08 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Mark Palmer wrote: Does any one know how to open vim (any version) from eclipse as a ole component, or bonobo? -mark Hmmm... Does it answer your question if I say that the OLE interface can only be included in native-Windows versions of gvim ? If it doesn't, see :help if_ole.txt and/or