Re: GNOME HIG compliance in gvim: button order in close confirmation dialogs (PATCH)

2007-01-08 Thread Trenton Schulz
On Jan 7, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Edward Catmur wrote: This patch improves HIG compliance when compiled with FEAT_GUI_GNOME: * Close confirmation dialogs use Save/Discard/Cancel instead of Yes/No/Cancel * GTK_STOCK_SAVE used for Save * Default button placed at end of

Re: GNOME HIG compliance in gvim: button order in close confirmation dialogs (PATCH)

2007-01-08 Thread Martin Stubenschrott
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:14:05PM +0100, Trenton Schulz wrote: I'll look into this later. Perhaps Save/Discard/Cancel is better for all GUIs, since you don't need to read the text to know whether yes means save or discard. But it will break the translations. Just being a lurker here, I

Re: GNOME HIG compliance in gvim: button order in close confirmation dialogs (PATCH)

2007-01-08 Thread Trenton Schulz
On Jan 8, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Martin Stubenschrott wrote: On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:14:05PM +0100, Trenton Schulz wrote: I'll look into this later. Perhaps Save/Discard/Cancel is better for all GUIs, since you don't need to read the text to know whether yes means save or discard. But it

Re: GNOME HIG compliance in gvim: button order in close confirmation dialogs (PATCH)

2007-01-08 Thread Martin Stubenschrott
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 05:05:31PM +0100, Trenton Schulz wrote: Would you also vote for changing the console style dialogs? I mean, console users are normally used to press y or n, when answering these kind of questions. Well, don't you do that by typing :wq/:wq! or ZZ or whatever? Most of

Re: GNOME HIG compliance in gvim: button order in close confirmation dialogs (PATCH)

2007-01-08 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 1/8/07, Trenton Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 8, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Martin Stubenschrott wrote: Would you also vote for changing the console style dialogs? I mean, console users are normally used to press y or n, when answering these kind of questions. Well, don't you do that

Re: compile vim7 with different or without local prefix /usr/local

2007-01-08 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Michael Haubenwallner wrote: maybe I've overlooked something in configure.in, but to me it seems that it is impossible to compile vim7 without searching /usr/local/include and /usr/local/lib. Thing is, on solaris fex, if iconv.h is found in /usr/local/include, /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so

Re: compile vim7 with different or without local prefix /usr/local

2007-01-08 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 22:16 +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Michael Haubenwallner wrote: maybe I've overlooked something in configure.in, but to me it seems that it is impossible to compile vim7 without searching /usr/local/include and /usr/local/lib. Thing is, on solaris fex, if