Steve Hall wrote:
Just assume all paths are Windows-hostile unless passed through such a
wrapper. (I never see these errors on *nix, so I assume it's path
related.)
I'll try it! The unfortunate part is, I can't test it. Or rather, I
can test to see if the wrapper introduces some
new
From: Charles E Campbell Jr, May 25, 2006 9:52 AM
Steve Hall wrote:
Just assume all paths are Windows-hostile unless passed through
such a wrapper. (I never see these errors on *nix, so I assume
it's path related.)
I'll try it! The unfortunate part is, I can't test it. Or rather, I
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
Hello, Tony!
I've had several folks having a problem with WinXP and netrw. The
problems seem to involve temporary files during attempts to use ftp;
since temporary filenames are produced by tempname(), they're o/s
dependent. Admittedly
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 12:04 -0400, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
I've had several folks having a problem with WinXP and netrw.
The problems seem to involve temporary files during attempts to
use ftp; since temporary filenames
Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
Hello, Tony!
I've had several folks having a problem with WinXP and netrw. The
problems seem to involve temporary files during attempts to use ftp;
since temporary filenames are produced by tempname(), they're o/s
dependent. Admittedly without having searched
