Re: Vim 7.1 and aap?

2007-05-14 Thread Richard van der Leeden
confirm aap (with or without CVS) is now installing version 7.1. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Vim-7.1-and-aap--tf3734936.html#a10575650 Sent from the Vim - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Vim 7.1 and aap?

2007-05-13 Thread Richard van der Leeden
this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Vim-7.1-and-aap--tf3734936.html#a10454641 Sent from the Vim - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Vim 7.1 and aap?

2007-05-13 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Richard van der Leeden wrote: Currently using AAP is still downloading and installing verison 7.0 (and all the patches). Will this be updated to load 7.1 instead? It's near the top of my todo list now. I have altered my local copy of main.aap to get 7.1 (and change the latest patch number

Re: Vim 7.1 and aap?

2007-05-13 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Richard van der Leeden wrote: Currently using AAP is still downloading and installing verison 7.0 (and all the patches). Will this be updated to load 7.1 instead? It's near the top of my todo list now. It's done. I verified that this gets you Vim 7.1 now: aap -f http://www.a

Re: vim 7.1?

2007-04-29 Thread Ian Tegebo
thinking about when a 7.1 release might be made? Yeah, it's about time for Vim 7.1. Unfortunately I haven't found a good moment to make a new release. And I don't see it happening in the coming weeks either... Would it be possible for people to help make new releases? You can certainly

Re: vim 7.1?

2007-04-28 Thread Bram Moolenaar
? Yeah, it's about time for Vim 7.1. Unfortunately I haven't found a good moment to make a new release. And I don't see it happening in the coming weeks either... Would it be possible for people to help make new releases? You can certainly help fixing bugs. There is about a hundred of them

Re: vim 7.1?

2007-04-27 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 4/27/07, Jonathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - Insane? All is relative. We're only at 7.0.233 as of today. FYI, Vim 6.2 went to 532 patches, see http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/ Release early, release often :) Isn't that what's being done? We're at

Re: vim 7.1?

2007-04-27 Thread Edward L. Fox
On 4/27/07, Jonathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - Insane? All is relative. We're only at 7.0.233 as of today. FYI, Vim 6.2 went to 532 patches, see http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/ Release early, release often :) Yes, I admit that you are right. But

Re: vim 7.1?

2007-04-27 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 4/27/07, Jonathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - Insane? All is relative. We're only at 7.0.233 as of today. FYI, Vim 6.2 went to 532 patches, see http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/ Release early, release often :) Isn't that what's

Re: vim 7.1?

2007-04-27 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 4/27/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 4/27/07, Jonathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - Insane? All is relative. We're only at 7.0.233 as of today. FYI, Vim 6.2 went to 532 patches, see http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/

Re: vim 7.1?

2007-04-27 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 4/27/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 4/27/07, Jonathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - Insane? All is relative. We're only at 7.0.233 as of today. FYI, Vim 6.2 went to 532 patches, see

Re: vim 7.1?

2007-04-27 Thread Yakov Lerner
The svn tree has all patches already inside, it does not matter how many patches are there. You just checkout and build. It's not that you need to download baseline and then 222 patches, no. Yakov On 4/27/07, Jonathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the insane number of patches collecting

Re: vim 7.1?

2007-04-27 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Jonathan Smith wrote: With the insane number of patches collecting against 7.0, and presumably the new features accumulating in the devel tree, is anyone thinking about when a 7.1 release might be made? Yeah, it's about time for Vim 7.1. Unfortunately I haven't found a good moment to make

Re: vim 7.1?

2007-04-27 Thread Ian Tegebo
On 4/27/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jonathan Smith wrote: With the insane number of patches collecting against 7.0, and presumably the new features accumulating in the devel tree, is anyone thinking about when a 7.1 release might be made? Yeah, it's about time for Vim 7.1

vim 7.1?

2007-04-26 Thread Jonathan Smith
With the insane number of patches collecting against 7.0, and presumably the new features accumulating in the devel tree, is anyone thinking about when a 7.1 release might be made? -smithj

Re: vim 7.1?

2007-04-26 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Jonathan Smith wrote: With the insane number of patches collecting against 7.0, and presumably the new features accumulating in the devel tree, is anyone thinking about when a 7.1 release might be made? -smithj - Insane? All is relative. We're only at 7.0.233 as of today. FYI, Vim 6.2

Re: vim 7.1?

2007-04-26 Thread Jonathan Smith
A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - Insane? All is relative. We're only at 7.0.233 as of today. FYI, Vim 6.2 went to 532 patches, see http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/ Release early, release often :) - What devel tree? I'll believe that a 7.1 is on the rails when I see at least an alpha. Before that,

Re: vim 7.1?

2007-04-26 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Jonathan Smith wrote: [...] Even if BM is the only one who can actually make a release, I'd imagine others have opinions on the matter. Anyway, I was just wondering. -smithj AFAICT, the current bugs are all (or almost all) mere bugfixes. I don't feel a release is imperatively called-for