Re: Fwd: Do Not Reply To This Message:Re: Time to remove naming restrictions?

2006-10-06 Thread Ali Akcaagac
Hello, I received feedback from them today and they said that they recently had a lot of issues with bouncing back and that they finally solved this issue. We therefore should not receive anything from them anymore. greetings, Ali Akcaagac On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 12:13 +0200, A.J.Mechelynck

Re: Fwd: Do Not Reply To This Message:Re: Time to remove naming restrictions?

2006-10-06 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Ali Akcaagac wrote: Hello, I received feedback from them today and they said that they recently had a lot of issues with bouncing back and that they finally solved this issue. We therefore should not receive anything from them anymore. greetings, Ali Akcaagac We'll see -- or rather

Re: Time to remove naming restrictions?

2006-10-04 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 10/4/06, Peter Hodge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's about 4 lines of vim source code which you need to remove so that you can have lower-case user commands. You're not interested in making your own patch? Seeing as you've identified the location and apparent fix, why not you? Anyway, I

Re: Time to remove naming restrictions?

2006-10-04 Thread Peter Hodge
Seeing as you've identified the location and apparent fix, why not you? Because I don't want to maintain my own set of patches, that would be more tiring than using upper-case commands. On Yahoo!7

Re: Time to remove naming restrictions?

2006-10-03 Thread Yakov Lerner
On 10/3/06, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 10/1/06, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nikolai Weibull wrote: One thing that really annoys me with Vim is the limits it emposes on what names are legal for user-defined functions and commands. I know

Re: Fwd: Do Not Reply To This Message:Re: Time to remove naming restrictions?

2006-10-03 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
-0400 Subject: Do Not Reply To This Message:Re: Time to remove naming restrictions? To: Nikolai Weibull [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] Yeah, I get them too. It means someone at knbt discontinued his mail account (or got it cancelled) without going to the trouble of unsubscribing from Vim. Since

Re: Do Not Reply To This Message:Re: Time to remove naming restrictions?

2006-10-03 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Nikolai Weibull wrote: [...] So anyway, I guess my request is for Felix von Leitner, or whoever doesn't maintain this mailing list anymore (according to earlier discussions on similar subjects), to remove the offending email address from the mailing address. Thanks. nikolai P.S. Sorry about

Re: Fwd: Do Not Reply To This Message:Re: Time to remove naming restrictions?

2006-10-03 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Ali Akcaagac wrote: On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 11:34 +0200, A.J.Mechelynck wrote: You can either blacklist [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your mail reader (e.g. by creating a new filter rule, 'if From: is [EMAIL PROTECTED] then Move to Trash'), or treat it in whatever manner you treat spam. Hello, I'm

Re: Time to remove naming restrictions?

2006-10-03 Thread Hari Krishna Dara
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 at 10:30am, A.J.Mechelynck wrote: Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 10/1/06, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nikolai Weibull wrote: One thing that really annoys me with Vim is the limits it emposes on what names are legal for user-defined functions and commands.

Re: Time to remove naming restrictions?

2006-10-03 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 10/3/06, Hari Krishna Dara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nikolai Weibull wrote: One thing that really annoys me with Vim is the limits it emposes on what names are legal for user-defined functions and commands. Another oddity in using this approach is the history. If you execute:

Re: Time to remove naming restrictions?

2006-10-03 Thread Peter Hodge
Argh. This is exactly why all the hacks one has to employ never really quite make it. There's always some base you haven't covered, some point you can't reach. Seriously, if people want to f**k up their session, let them. No one who isn't prepared to get burned is going to override

Re: Time to remove naming restrictions?

2006-10-02 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 10/1/06, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nikolai Weibull wrote: One thing that really annoys me with Vim is the limits it emposes on what names are legal for user-defined functions and commands. I know the reason for these restrictions, but I don't think they make much sense,

Fwd: Do Not Reply To This Message:Re: Time to remove naming restrictions?

2006-10-02 Thread Nikolai Weibull
To This Message:Re: Time to remove naming restrictions? To: Nikolai Weibull [EMAIL PROTECTED] You have reached an email address at KNBT that is unavailable or no longer valid. If you have any questions please call our customer service number at 1-800-996-2062 (toll-free), Monday – Friday: 7

Re: Do Not Reply To This Message:Re: Time to remove naming restrictions?

2006-10-02 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 10/2/06, Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Me too. I think it means that (1) email address at KNBT that is unavailable or no longer valid, and (2) it's time for you to add special filtering rule to your mail reader. I mean, who said mail bot cannot post to mailing list ? It's not