Hi Randy,
Thanks for the info. I'll have a go soon to see if I can get it up and
running. The only thing that may be a problem is the internal IDE drive in
the PB 150 which may not be fully supported by the kernel.
Edwin
PB 150, 8 MB Ram, 120MB HD
Or the fact that the hd driver software is
Thanks pickle, As I said, I should be contented with a IIsi at 25MHz
and I'm going to try to be.
Das pickle wrote:
Note that the Daystar adapters/cards don't like to work with a clock of
27MHz or more either,...
Hardy, Hard's Disk Ltd., Freehold NY. A branch of the Abandoned Computer
Ok, I've had enough and now I have to add my $.11. Why are you
bothering with Linux? NetBSD is the one to go with on 68k Macs.
I've put it on my IIci and Q800 and both run flawlessly. Why go with
linux? NetBSD is a mature UNIX for 68k Macs. The only drawback to
it is the non-support
A computer is a computer, and any computer is better
than no computer, ... unless it is a Commodore, ... or a PC JR., or a
CPM,... a 286 or ... well ... ah forget about it.
A Commodore 64 is better than all those inferior little things. :-P
Commodore 64 user since 1984 and still using
Marten writes:
If you want a speedy IIsi, use a way faster operating system :-)
Cool, I'm using 7.6.1. Is there a much faster OS for a IIsi? I know
there's an article about running 8.1 on LEM but that's over the top and
I've only got a 250 mb HD.
Hardy, Hard's Disk Ltd., Freehold NY. A branch
Marten writes:
If you want a speedy IIsi, use a way faster operating system :-)
Cool, I'm using 7.6.1. Is there a much faster OS for a IIsi? I know
there's an article about running 8.1 on LEM but that's over the top and
I've only got a 250 mb HD.
8.1 will slow it down even more. The fastest is
If you want a speedy IIsi, use a way faster operating system :-)
Cool, I'm using 7.6.1. Is there a much faster OS for a IIsi? I know
there's an article about running 8.1 on LEM but that's over the top and
I've only got a 250 mb HD.
I found on a 6100 that switching to a 1GB HD sped things up a
7.1? yeah I know it's pickles favorite too but I used to get a lot of
crashes. 7.6.1 allows more flexiblilty. but I really like the stability.
Hardy, Hard's Disk Ltd., Freehold NY. A branch of the Abandoned Computer
Shelter. Apple and Mac systems and parts gratefully accepted. Systems
charitably
7.1? yeah I know it's pickles favorite too but I used to get a lot of
crashes. 7.6.1 allows more flexiblilty. but I really like the stability.
7.6.1 is indeed very stable, not as stable as some other operating system I
know though...
Marten
Yeah, Yeah, Ok, Ok. :)
Hardy, Hard's Disk Ltd., Freehold NY. A branch of the Abandoned Computer
Shelter. Apple and Mac systems and parts gratefully accepted. Systems
charitably donated without profit. http://www.jmug.org/acs for a branch
near you.
--
Vintage Macs is sponsored by
--- Scott Barber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
s'up william,
Now that I've installed it on the fx, I'll be trying
again with JohnHenry
the se30.
Scott
I just got a 6115CD for yellow dog and I'm going to
put the potato on an SE/30 so that I can have it in my
office during work. The IT guys
Or be a true 100% Apple supporter and go with A/UX *Ducks*
That statement reminded me of a question I had:
Does anyone know of a SMB (Samba) server for A/UX? Freeware, commercial,
doesn't matter.
--
Vintage Macs is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronics
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 21:29:18 -0700
From: Randy Beaudreault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: linux m68k
Message-id: a05100300b7a24918497a@[192.168.1.2]
Subject: linux m68k on IIfx
Hi, Scott or anyone else who knows about such things
I'm interested in trying out linux on my PowerBook
Would someone please tell me the difference between PS 2.5 and 2.5.1? I
want to use 2.5 in some vintage Macs but don't know what the .1 update
enabled and whether that would even have a bearing on what I want to do.
I don't have the updater and haven't found any decent info on it.
Most likely
From: Cameron Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: linux m68k
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 05:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
I definitely agree -- satisfied user of NetBSD on a IIci with a Daystar
'030 50MHz, Quantum Empire 2.05GB, 128MB RAM, and two Farallon EtherWave
NuBus
Would someone please tell me the difference between PS 2.5 and 2.5.1? I
want to use 2.5 in some vintage Macs but don't know what the .1 update
enabled and whether that would even have a bearing on what I want to do.
I don't have the updater and haven't found any decent info on it.
Bob,
Don't
Greetings, all...
Would someone please tell me the difference between PS 2.5 and 2.5.1? I
want to use 2.5 in some vintage Macs but don't know what the .1 update
enabled and whether that would even have a bearing on what I want to do.
I don't have the updater and haven't found any decent
-
BTW, 2.5.1 was the 1st Pshop to be PPC-native (via a
plug-in), if you're
using a PPC, it's at:
ftp://wuarchive.wustl.edu/systems/mac/info-mac/gst/grf/pshp/photoshop-ppc-plugin.hqx
But delete the or you ain't going anywhere.
=
Renegade Infidel
http://www.artaudsociety.com
--
--- Gene Osburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob,
Don't have a specific answer for you on that. But
it seems to me
thatmost .1 updates tend to address stability
issues, rather than any
significant feature enhancements. I routinely apply
.1 updates to any
software I have installed, SOP. I
--- William Ahearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
BTW, 2.5.1 was the 1st Pshop to be PPC-native (via
a
plug-in), if you're
using a PPC, it's at:
ftp://wuarchive.wustl.edu/systems/mac/info-mac/gst/grf/pshp/photoshop-ppc-plugin.hqx
But delete the or you ain't going anywhere.
At 23:44 -0600 on 16/08/01, Steve Conrad wrote:
Ok, I've had enough and now I have to add my $.11. Why are you
bothering with Linux? NetBSD is the one to go with on 68k Macs.
I've put it on my IIci and Q800 and both run flawlessly. Why go with
linux? NetBSD is a mature UNIX for 68k Macs.
At 09:49 -0400 on 17/08/01, Robert Poland wrote:
If you want a speedy IIsi, use a way faster operating system :-)
Cool, I'm using 7.6.1. Is there a much faster OS for a IIsi? I know
there's an article about running 8.1 on LEM but that's over the top and
I've only got a 250 mb HD.
I found on a
At 13:24 -0400 on 17/08/01, Sean McGroty wrote:
Or be a true 100% Apple supporter and go with A/UX *Ducks*
That statement reminded me of a question I had:
Does anyone know of a SMB (Samba) server for A/UX? Freeware, commercial,
doesn't matter.
Any chance that one of the ones for another
In theory, yes. However, a lot of programs would have to be ported before
A/UX was up to date enough to run Samba (Or most open-source programs for
that matter).
Right off the top of my head, I know A/UX would need gcc, make, SysV or BSD
init system, and a netlink socket (Raw access to the
No it wasn't. I burned it on my PowerMac 7600. Used Toast 5, had to use
MacGzip to uncompress it, then play with the type/creator codes in ResEdit.
But it's doable.
Terry
Rather ironic, I must say, that the only way to get A/UX off the 'net
requires a peecee to burn the necessary install
--- the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 23:44 -0600 on 16/08/01, Steve Conrad wrote:
Ok, I've had enough and now I have to add my $.11.
Why are you
bothering with Linux? NetBSD is the one to go
with on 68k Macs.
I've put it on my IIci and Q800 and both run
flawlessly. Why go with
At 17:18 -0400 on 17/08/01, Terry Mathews wrote:
No it wasn't. I burned it on my PowerMac 7600. Used Toast 5, had to use
MacGzip to uncompress it, then play with the type/creator codes in ResEdit.
What type/creator codes did you end up using? Toast 4 does NOT like the
image at all, at least
I don't remember exactly. If I'm remembering right, I made an image of like
a 20MB CD then copied the type and creator out of it, and applied it to the
file.
The trick is that the OEM version of Toast won't handle CD images. Only the
retail version will.
Terry
What type/creator codes did you
At 17:30 -0400 on 17/08/01, Terry Mathews wrote:
I don't remember exactly. If I'm remembering right, I made an image of like
a 20MB CD then copied the type and creator out of it, and applied it to the
file.
The trick is that the OEM version of Toast won't handle CD images. Only the
retail
It's of dubious legality, but since I own the OEM version of Toast, I went
ahead and got it off characho...
Terry
Bastards! Like I'm gonna pay $79 for the retail version...argh...
--
Vintage Macs is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronics
--- Gene Osburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob,
Don't have a specific answer for you on that. But
it seems to me
thatmost .1 updates tend to address stability
issues, rather than any
significant feature enhancements. I routinely apply
.1 updates to any
software I have installed,
Greetings Edwin,
I did a comparison of the supported hardware on the m68K site, and the specs
for your machine on lowendmac...
From what I can gather, any Mac with the 68030 processor and FPU should boot
Linux, but as far as I know the PB 150
on 8/17/01 2:30 PM, Terry Mathews at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The trick is that the OEM version of Toast won't handle CD images. Only the
retail version will.
Ah. This is what I suspected. Figures.
--
Alex Allee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Visit EnigMac!
On Tuesday, August 14, 2001, at 11:29 PM, Ivan Waite wrote:
on 8/14/01 7:42 PM, John Kocijanski at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. I just picked up a HP Deskwriter 600 printerat
a local thrift stor for $5. I has a almost full black
ink cartidge in it. It also came with a power supply
Vintage Macs wrote...
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Judson)
Subject: Re: Photoshop 2.5 to 2.5.1
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 14:20:53 -0500 (CDT)
Greetings, all...
Would someone please tell me the difference between PS 2.5 and 2.5.1? I
want to use 2.5 in some vintage Macs but don't know what
I don't remember exactly. If I'm remembering right, I made an image of like
a 20MB CD then copied the type and creator out of it, and applied it to the
file.
The trick is that the OEM version of Toast won't handle CD images. Only the
retail version will.
Bastards! Like I'm gonna pay $79 for
36 matches
Mail list logo
