--
From: the pickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vintage Macs)
Subject: Re: Mac vs PC Junk (was Re: Outlook/Windows users on this list?)
Date: Sun, Aug 5, 2001, 4:48 PM
At 15:16 -0700 on 03/08/01, Alex Allee wrote:
That is hardly cramming. :) Try 9.0.4 on a 7500/100 w
on 8/4/01 3:00 PM, (Vintage Macs) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is hardly cramming. :) Try 9.0.4 on a 7500/100 w/ 32MB of RAM and a 1GB
hard drive. *That* is cramming.
I once got 8.0 on an LC475 with a 160MB hard drive and 16MB RAM! Wasn't
pretty, but it was an accomplishment! :)
--
laptop. He's been wanting to cram Mac OS 9.1 on this
G3/233 that only has 160megs RAM and a 4 gig HD.
Compared to the others, that's hardly cramming it on there...
I'd say so too. I have a iMac rev. A with 96 mb running 9.1 Really no
problem...
Ditto! If your friend has need for features
Amber Rhea wrote:
I once got 8.0 on an LC475 with a 160MB hard drive and 16MB RAM! Wasn't
pretty, but it was an accomplishment! :)
Why?
That's right! You are a member of the Vintage Macs list... The
land where folks will do things, if for no other reason than, They
said, It can't be
Andrew Michael MacTao wrote:
Amber Rhea wrote:
I once got 8.0 on an LC475 with a 160MB hard drive and 16MB RAM! Wasn't
pretty, but it was an accomplishment! :)
Why?
That's right! You are a member of the Vintage Macs list... The
land where folks will do things, if for no other
Darren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find old pentiums on the side of the road, no cash needed, all work.
Still to find any mac's, found a Apple IIe and thought my self very lucky.
:)
(some classic gaming there) Also the Classic II with the checkered screen
[...]
In in a Midwestern (US)
Amber Rhea wrote:
Honestly, when I use
Windows, even for only ten minutes, I become irritable, fidgety, and
generally pissed off at the world. That's *exactly* how I want to feel
*every time* I sit down at the computer!! And my opinions of people at work
are largely shaped by their operating
on 7/30/01 2:06 PM, (Vintage Macs) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And then the issue of one system being just as good as the other...
Comparing brand new pc's to 10 year old macs... Really people, Mac OS
X is far superior to any other operating system out there, be it
windows or linux. Most
At 11:43 AM +0200 7/28/2001, Marten van de Kraats wrote:
evolution: survival of the fittest and all that stuff. PC's are for
the stupid masses, Macs are for the spiritual and intellectual elite.
Our machines are just better and stronger. :-)
I disagree. I was a PC-head (I still play one at
At 9:18 am -0700 7/27/01, regarding Outlook/Windows users on this
list?, Gregg Eshelman penned sagely:
- Thare are about a half dozen people out there who's
- computers have the latest Outlook/Outlook Express
- virus and I keep getting junk attachments from them.
- :P
-
- I certainly
--- Michael J. Flaherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thare are about a half dozen people out there
who's
computers have the latest Outlook/Outlook Express
virus and I keep getting junk attachments from
them.
What are they ? .exe files ?
The virus grabs a random file off the
That is the one. :P
--- Cameron Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thare are about a half dozen people out there
who's
computers have the latest Outlook/Outlook
Express
virus and I keep getting junk attachments from
them.
What are they ? .exe files ?
I'm wondering if they got
--- Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My estimation is that yes, it's a very bad infection
this time. I've
received about a dozen copies of it in the past
couple days.
Fortunately I drive a Mac...
That's why I use Yahoo mail for mailing lists. Ain't
gonna get no viri that way. For my normal
That would be yet another very good reason to run 7.1 instead of 7.5.x.
(Now if the virus kiddies would get smarter and
figure
out how to package along a nasty AppleScript instead
of a Visual Basic Script...)
--
Check out the System 6
There was already an applescript virus not long ago. It was called
'Simpson' or something like that.
Marten
Is Outlook 5.0.2 for Mac AppleScriptable? If so I'll
bet an enterprising cracker could do the same junk
to Macs.
--
Check out
--- Steve Moody [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 9:17 PM -0400 7/27/2001, Amber Rhea wrote:
What was the statistic? Over 10,000 known Windows
viruses and fewer than 10
for the Mac?
Closer to truth is 15,000 for Windows/DOS and 700
for Mac. The
chance of an effective worm for a Mac would
--- Steve Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Closer to truth is 15,000 for Windows/DOS and
700 for Mac. The
chance of an effective worm for a Mac would be for
it to be cross
platform. Possible? Likely?
Any that would affect the Mac nowadays (OS X) would
have to also affect
17 matches
Mail list logo
