Mark mistakenly sent this to me instead of to list
-Message d'origine-
De : Mark Lent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyi : lundi 22 dicembre 2003 20:06
@ : Seak, Teng-Fong
Objet : RE: Netgear RP614 Router
Hello Jim,
As a former Winter Haven resident myself, how could I not help?
I had installed and was using v.3.3.7 successfully for some time. Using
Windows 2000 uninstall I successfully removed v.3.3.7 from my system and
then installed v.4.0b4 beta. The beta version also worked, but because it
would cut out every now and then I decided to uninstall it, again using
Windows
1 and 4 are due to focus problems when running fullscreen. Try without
fullscreen.
2 is probably because you have your numlock key enabled.
3: dunno.
RealVNC is overdue for a new beta.
Wout.
Saturday at 19:55, Jerry McBride ponderously produced:
I've got some problems with the 4.0b4 linux
One of the nice things about standards, is that there are so many to choose
from..
I am trying to choose a flavor of VNC, strictly for Windows use. Would
anyone care to offer their recommendation as to which version I should
choose, and why?
-Eri c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am trying to choose a flavor of VNC, strictly for Windows use. Would
anyone care to offer their recommendation as to which version I should
choose, and why?
They are all free. Try them all out and use the one that works best for
you in your situation.
--
William
On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 21:12, William Hooper wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am trying to choose a flavor of VNC, strictly for Windows use. Would
anyone care to offer their recommendation as to which version I should
choose, and why?
They are all free. Try them all out and use the one
I was hoping to benefit from the experience and wisdom of those on this
group who have already done so...
William Hooper
At 6:06 PM -0900 12/22/03, ListGetterRyan wrote:
Hello All. I'm wondering if someone can tell me if its possible for me to
run a VNC server on Mac OSX and connect to it with a viewer on WinXP ?
yes, it is.
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
At 12:57 PM -0800 12/23/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was hoping to benefit from the experience and wisdom of those on this
group who have already done so...
RealVNC and TightVNC. Good, stable, fully cross platform. I like
tight, it seems faster but I do cross platform work.
UltraVNC -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I was hoping to benefit from the experience and wisdom of those on this
group who have already done so...
But none of us are in your situation. You haven't even talked about what
you expect, what kind of connection, etc.
It's like asking for the best kind of air
William,
I am just geting started, so I really do not know fully what to ask for,
except that I want good remote control on windows platforms. That is why I
posted the question here first -- to get some pointers about where to
start...
Since you press me for details, here's my best attempt:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Since you press me for details, here's my best attempt: If I can have
full
control over a windows 32 platform with decent response,
Again, you will have to try them out in your network situation to see
about decent response.
and the ability
to
run as a service,
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:53:32PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
better. Ideally, if I can find a way to package a version of VNC so that I
can email it to someone and have them easily install it so that they can
connect to me via a predefined IP (so that they have to do as little as
William wrote: According to the archives you hijacked the thread
discussing this:
http://www.realvnc.com/pipermail/vnc-list/2003-December/042332.html;
William, I did not realize that there was thread tracking. Sorry. I did not
mean to hijack any thread, but to start my own. I simply chose a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
William, I did not realize that there was thread tracking. Sorry. I did
not
mean to hijack any thread, but to start my own.
Not a big deal, just pointing it out.
I simply chose a message
in
my inbox and responded to it as a way to get the address.
Which is why the
At 2:53 PM -0800 12/23/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since you press me for details, here's my best attempt: If I can have full
control over a windows 32 platform with decent response, and the ability to
run as a service, that would be great. The easier that I can make it for
someone to remotely
Okay, there is nothing in your wish list that can't be done
on ANY of the branches.
If you want someone to see your screen, then they can access it via any
web browser without installing any software.
If you want to controll someone's pc they are going to have to install
the server, all can be
17 matches
Mail list logo
