If the energy (E) in the classical equation E = mc^2 intrinsically contains
(is part of) the Vacuum Zero Point Energy (ZPE) then:
dE = dmc^2
IOW, the classical radius of the fundamental particles, R = kq^2/Eor R = kq^2/mc^2
can be varied by"environmental" conditions that vary the intrinsic
At 5:26 AM 2/15/5, Frederick Sparber wrote:
If the energy (E) in the classical equation E = mc^2 intrinsically contains
(is part of) the Vacuum Zero Point Energy (ZPE) then:
dE = dmc^2
IOW, the classical radius of the fundamental particles, R = kq^2/E or R
= kq^2/mc^2
can be varied by
At 5:26 AM 2/15/5, Frederick Sparber wrote:
If the energy (E) in the classical equation E = mc^2 intrinsically contains
(is part of) the Vacuum Zero Point Energy (ZPE) then:
dE = dmc^2
IOW, the classical radius of the fundamental particles, R = kq^2/E or R
= kq^2/mc^2
can be varied by
Keith wrote: . .
Hey Terry,
Nope, not a one. But LRH himself makes for a remarkable
biographical subject. Just don't bother with the offical
stuff, it's all phony and boring to boot. The real story
is fascinating and well worth the few hours of reading. Here's
the link
Horace Heffner wrote:
At 5:26 AM 2/15/5, Frederick Sparber wrote:
If the energy (E) in the classical equation E = mc^2 intrinsically
contains
(is part of) the Vacuum Zero Point Energy (ZPE) then:
dE = dmc^2
IOW, the classical radius of the fundamental particles, R = kq^2/E or
R
=
- Original Messages -
From: Frederick Sparber and Horace Heffner
Does this mean that Bridgman's high pressure squeezing of
water/ice dumped energy, then ZPE pumped in enough energy
to allow it to explode when the pressure was released?
[snip] or the 1/R^4 attractive force between the
Mike writes:
LRH's story is remarkable indeed and I paid close attention to his work, and
his critics, for many years. He did indeed write Mission Earth and I read
part of the series and then got bored with it; it is not his best writing.
As for Clambake, don't assume that a collection of quotes
Because wind energy is becoming cheaper,but isoften not
available when or where it is most needed, here is a suggestion on the best way
to store wind energy.
Produce liquid air for atransportation fuel (i.e. energy storage
medium).
Let me repeat (as a query ) one more time for emphasis. Is
The "Mission Earth" thread was not intended to devolve into a discussion on Scientology. Indeed, I believe the anecdote that LRH started Scientology as a result of a bet with Robert Heinlein; that, LRH could not invent a religion that would be recognized as such by the IRS.
But, here it is,
(O)ff (T)opic for some,
(O)perating (T)hetan to others...
Ordinarily I'd excoriate you for not reading the links, but that
joke of yours was so funny that Coyote almost choked on his
rabbit breakfast... So he's willing to do some digging for you.
Here's the story of Parsons and Hubbard.
Terry -
Looks to me like the force from a giant impactor (or the lifting tide of a near
miss with a large body) might have almost broken the moon in half, but the two
sides of the enormous fissure slapped back together from gravity, raising a
ridge. (Bet Harold Edgerton would have loved to get
Horace wrote:
snip
[snip]
...compressors are much cheaper than electric generators, these wind
farms
should cost less.
A critical issue is efficient extraction of energy from the wind over a
range of vind velocities. Such is accomplished by the current genration of
wind tubines with the help
Richard C Hoagland was interview on C to C AM a few days ago. He
suggested that I read his paper on what Cassini found on Saturn's
moon Iapetus.
One of the tenants of natural philosophy is that straight lines,
square corners, and bisymmetries don't occur naturally. The straight
line in
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:23:30 -0600:
Hi,
If a smaller and a larger sphere collided at just the right speed, you might
get a ridge line where they joined, and the resultant object would not be
spherical because the two spheres were different sizes. However it
At 8:13 AM 2/15/5, Frederick Sparber wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
[snip]
For example, if an
electron can be confined to a 1 angstrom range then there is an
uncertainty
of 1.06x10^-24 kg-m/s on the momentum and thus 6.1x10^-19 J or 3.8 eV
uncertainty on energy.
Does this mean that Bridgman's
At 2:57 PM 2/15/5, Mike Carrell wrote:
Horace wrote:
snip
[snip]
...compressors are much cheaper than electric generators, these wind
farms
should cost less.
I did not write the above. In fact I questioned it. Jones wrote it.
Home heating efficiency and cost can be much improved by using
...compressors are much cheaper than electric generators,
these wind
farms should cost less.
I did not write the above. In fact I questioned it.
Jones wrote it.
Yup, I wrote it and stand by it.
Here is an example. Maybe you can find a contrary one...
(I'm sure you can, but it stands to
At 12:22 PM 2/15/5, Jones Beene wrote:
Anyway at the wind mill itself air can be compressed and then cooled and
recompressed however many times is necessary to give liquid air at an
optimum efficiency of 48 % of the torque. I disagree with Mike that this
process is not as efficient at low air
Horace Heffner wrote:
Though this is all good
discussion and the approach may yield practical
results for a while, it is important to realize that wind can not solve
all
the worlds energy problems, and working on a new *source* of energy is
the
big problem.
I'll bet wind could supply half the
I wrote:
I'll bet wind could supply half the world's energy, especially in
countries far from the equator. It could
easily supply all energy in the U.S. and Northern Europe, and most
in northern China.
And for that matter, I think ocean currents such as the Gulf Stream could
supply way more
Horace
Though this is all good discussion and the approach may
yield practical results for a while, it is important to
realize that wind can not solve all the worlds energy
problems, and working on a new *source* of energy is the big
problem.
Yes. I agree with most of what has been said here.
I think one of the best arguments in favor of the
cryo-fuel idea is that it's evolutionary. All of
the processes are known and only need to be scaled
up and made more efficient. Storage and transport
would automatically be more efficient on a larger
scale.
Although oil companies wouldn't be
At 5:31 PM 2/15/5, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Though this is all good discussion and the approach may yield practical
results for a while, it is important to realize that wind can not solve all
the worlds energy problems, and working on a new *source* of energy is the
big problem.
I'll bet wind could
At 2:03 PM 2/15/5, Jones Beene wrote:
...compressors are much cheaper than electric generators,
these wind
farms should cost less.
I did not write the above. In fact I questioned it.
Jones wrote it.
Yup, I wrote it and stand by it.
Here is an example. Maybe you can find a contrary one...
Jones wrote:
snip
Anyway at the wind mill itself air can be compressed and then cooled and
recompressed however many times is necessary to give liquid air at an
optimum efficiency of 48 % of the torque. I disagree with Mike that this
process is not as efficient at low air speeds, but someone like
thomas malloy wrote:
and Jed Rothwell responded;
Michael Medved, michaelmedved.com interviewed Peter Huber author of
The Bottomless Well.
What hemisphere, exactly? If that include South America (Venezuela)
it is probably true. There is also a lot of oil in Canada and
Alaska. Of course it
Necessarymechanical systems required for a
Bridgman water/ice theme to function in an internal combustion engine can be
worked out. It is possible to create the vacuum and isolate and tailor the
actual product temperature required by the usinga variation of an ejector
throat and nozzle
Robin Von Spaandonk replied
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:23:30 -0600:
Hi,
If a smaller and a larger sphere collided at just the right speed,
you might get a ridge line where they joined, and the resultant
object would not be spherical because the two spheres were
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:56:48 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
If a smaller and a larger sphere collided at just the right speed,
you might get a ridge line where they joined, and the resultant
object would not be spherical because the two spheres were different
sizes.
29 matches
Mail list logo
