RE~Griggs Over-Unity Mass/Multiple Cavitation device~vs~THE OLD LAWS~
Re: Roarty response: The knee-jerk prozaic(or closest to prozaic straining at
it we can get) explanation starts to appear a bit Swamp-Gassy after a bit.
Yes the odd rapid Hydrogen-ization of the H2O molecule MAYBE
Hello Mike,
Yes, it doesn't look like big springs are able to be used
for storing much. I was hoping they could be wound up during high wind or
hot sun times for overnight use. Michel sent me the following which about
nails the idea but I wonder if they just mean a straight
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Stephen A. Lawrencesa...@pobox.com wrote:
Unless the cavitation is causing some (irreversible) chemical or nuclear
reaction, it has no more business producing a COP1.0 than just rubbing
two sticks together has.
Remember Bubblegate?
There is an amusing cnn.com VIDEO entry listing several notable (and
quite erroneous) Wikipedia entries, along with the organization's
attempt to rectify the problem. Wikipedia plans to implement more
stringent record keeping methodologies. Wiki hopes to better track
authors making entries, making
Following up on the recent cnn.com video clip concerning erroneous
entries I decided to revisit the COLD FUSION entry. I was surprised to
discover that at present there doesn't appear to be any disputing
going on. But appearances can be deceiving. Have most CF proponents
given up trying to make it
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/i-have-been-abducted-by-aliens-says-japans-first-lady-1780888.html
T
Jed spoke of this on the list. He has been falsely accused of
printing articles without the author's permission.
Terry
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:44 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V
Johnsonsvj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Following up on the recent cnn.com video clip concerning erroneous
entries I
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Cavitation might have played a part in the Russian hydro plant accident:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Sayano-Shushenskaya_hydro_accident
...or else, something a bit more sinister (and synergistic):
On Sep 2, 2009, at 10:47 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Indeed! See also:
http://www.rexresearch.com/griggs/griggs.htm
Note the following item, about 1/3 of the way down the page:
Just what happens when the Hydrosonic pump is filled up with
water and
switched on is described by
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Jones Beenejone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Cavitation might have played a part in the Russian hydro plant accident:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Sayano-Shushenskaya_hydro_accident
...or else, something a bit
At 10:27 AM 9/3/2009, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
There is an amusing cnn.com VIDEO entry listing several notable (and
quite erroneous) Wikipedia entries, along with the organization's
attempt to rectify the problem. Wikipedia plans to implement more
stringent record keeping
~CHILD's PLAY~~bye-bye MAINSPRING~
NICK: It just occurred to me that a Multiple-water-tank-tower AS THE STORAGE
DEVICE rather than using the 'spring-idea' at all might be a simple obvious
solution to 'over-night' power storage.
A Gyro-Centrific-Inertial(maybe generator also) device
From Terry:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/i-have-been-abducted-by-aliens-says-japans-first-lady-1780888.html
Yukido Hatoyama sez:
While my body was asleep, I think my soul rode on a triangular-shaped
UFO and went to Venus, she explains in the tome she published last
year. It
Anybody want to see a video of this sorry-assed thing? --Kyle
Yes!
Harry
Anybody want to see a video of this sorry-assed thing?
--Kyle
Yes!
I second that.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
If I'm banned from Wikipeida, as may happen in short order, the
biggest reason will be prolixity. Warning: this is long. If it does
not interest you, please don't read it, it will only irritate you.
At 10:44 AM 9/3/2009, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Following up on the recent cnn.com
The rest of us can chose to dismiss such accounts and experiences as
being ridiculous or as nothing more than harmless psychological
aberrations... but I think we do so at our own loss.
I agree with your words almost completely, but therein lies the rub. For
me.
I've investigated many accounts
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
From Terry:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/i-have-been-abducted-by-aliens-says-japans-first-lady-1780888.html
Yukido Hatoyama sez:
While my body was asleep, I think my soul rode on a triangular-shaped
UFO and went to Venus, she
At 11:20 AM 9/3/2009, you wrote:
Jed spoke of this on the list. He has been falsely accused of
printing articles without the author's permission.
I'll give some detail on that. It's a little more complicated.
The basic reason for blacklisting of the site was that it was fringe
advocacy, and
Jak,
Fair enough, I'll settle for the odd rapid Hydrogen-ization
of the H2O molecule MAYBE PARTIALLY ACCURATE but the 'reason' for it
would actually lead the Singularity Physics motif. I already admitted
that I couldn't see any electrolyte that would form conductive plates
out of the
From Terry,
Thanks for expounding on that, Abd. I'm curious, are you typing or
using a voxrec s/w like Dragonspeak?
:-)
I would like to add my complements to the chef as well.
I found Abd's analysis to be both informative and educational.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
~hydrolysis concept more complete NEUTRON-as-Mega-GLUON model added~plus
better edit in general sorry, I'm in a time-crunch here.~;-)
FRAN bear with me: My Ulterior Agenda is a 'New Atom Model' to be seriously
considered.
Using a Hydrogen Atom new Model: Consider that the
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
If I'm banned from Wikipeida, as may happen in short order, the
biggest reason will be prolixity.
No, the biggest reason will be the message you just posted here, plus
the fact that you are part of this discussion group.
In response to this article:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:20:41 -0700:
Hi,
What you are essentially describing is a positive feedback loop. However there
may be more mundane causes of positive feedback. E.g. situations where
ionizing radiation increases the fuel available to a fusion reaction,
I wrote:
However, I am having trouble downloading them. The largest one, 26
MB, does not want to download. I have uploaded it 3 times. It is this file:
. . .
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/EPRIproceedingc.pdf
There is something wrong with my Mozilla Firefox configuration. It is
trying to
I just checked Wikipedia for the first time in months. Their latest
shenanigan is to delete Dieter Britz's site. They made up some strange
sounding reason. It is kind of funny because Britz is on their side. He is a
skeptic who does not believe cold fusion is real.
Since we cannot do anything to
At 02:26 PM 9/3/2009, Terry Blanton wrote:
Thanks for expounding on that, Abd. I'm curious, are you typing or
using a voxrec s/w like Dragonspeak?
Typing. I bought Dragonspeak when I had a carpal tunnel release, but
never used it.
- Original Message -
From: Kyle Mcallister kyle_mcallis...@yahoo.com
Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009 10:52 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BB motor -- explanation (maybe not!)
--- On Thu, 9/3/09, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Yes!
I second that.
You got it.
Nice video! Text plus multiple scenes. You must have a video editor
of some kind.
I'm surprised the thing held together that well, considering the
imbalance from the U bolts. It certainly does demonstrate the motor
works in that configuration
I like your motto!
Best regards,
Horace
Steve and Vortex,
About a year ago, I think it was, the Wikipedia cold fusion haters
blacklisted New Energy Times because I added some links to - heaven forbid
- the NET site which I thought would be useful. You know, the Internet is
good for Wiki, it's good for NET too - we're both vehicles
At 07:07 PM 9/3/2009, you wrote:
At 02:26 PM 9/3/2009, Terry Blanton wrote:
Thanks for expounding on that, Abd. I'm curious, are you typing or
using a voxrec s/w like Dragonspeak?
Typing. I bought Dragonspeak when I had a carpal tunnel release, but never
used it.
brevity?
naw!
At 06:33 PM 9/3/2009, Michel Jullian wrote:
Indeed, thanks for the most interesting summary, Abd! So you have now
logically decided to see by yourself whether CF is real or not?
Well, I'm pretty well convinced, from the published evidence, that
it's real. However, that conclusion isn't
32 matches
Mail list logo
