On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
These bacteria gourmets are eating arsenic, OK! I have some doubts re
fluorine and chlorine,
but I am open to the facts.
What wasn't clear in the press release but is in the detailed article:
Thanks Terry, what is disturbing: we a;ready knew about this- Lake Mono and
more arsenic eating bacteria species see e.g. Discovery Channel, Aug 14,
2008.
In my opinion, Mesenchytraeus solifugus- the Alaskan ice worm is even
stranger and typical for understanding the essence of life conquering
.Humbled by chidrens mouthwash! I couldn't get the mouthwash to pour
into my cup - a tube and seal in the container kept the liquid trapped every
time I tried to pout it! unintentionally I squeezed the plastic bottle while
picking it up and saw the liquid start to fill the throat of the
Fran sez:
· Humbled by chidrens mouthwash! I couldn't get the
mouthwash to pour into my cup - a tube and seal in the
container kept the liquid trapped every time I tried to pout it!
unintentionally I squeezed the plastic bottle while picking it
up and saw the liquid start to fill the
Here's another way to use Vt in a prediction. Because it looks as though
Vt can be used to derive Planck's Constant, then use Planck's Constant
to calculate a very accurate Vt. I don't know how accurate these other
variables have been measured, but presumably, they are far past the 4
significant
Some peanut butter jars dont do that...
on the original post, I am familiar with the bottle design. The top
cup has little measuring marks, and the instructions on the bottle
clearly tell you what to do. Remember, RTFM!
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:22 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
-Original Message-
From: Craig Haynie
by back-calculating Vt, we can then use it to predict the effective radii of
protons in the nucleus, which is the variable that seems to be the least
certain.
Craig, as you no doubt have noticed in this exercise, the proton radius has
been a
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 09:23 -0800, Jones Beene wrote:
OK, let's backtrack. Apparently we are not on the same page yet.
In the spirit of KISS and simplicity, the internationally-accepted value of
the proton's charge radius is 0.8768 fm. Is there a valid reason to use
anything else?
If Vt
However, it looks to me as if they are calculating the value of 1.36e-15
as the effective proton radius, using Planck's Constant.
http://tinyurl.com/345cnr9
If anyone wants to help me read it, scroll down to Microscopic analysis
of nucleus-nucleus elastic scattering at intermediate
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/345cnr9
If anyone wants to help me read it, scroll down to Microscopic analysis
of nucleus-nucleus elastic scattering at intermediate energies, and
open the PDF. Search for 1.36.
The article is
The article is almost 9 euros. Can't you just share your copy?
I'll send you my copy in my next email, but I don't know how to send it
to the list. Otherwise, you can scroll down to it on this link, and open
the PDF on the right side of the Google Scholar page. It's article
number 4 on the
-Original Message-
From: Craig Haynie
Jones Beene brings up a good point. Why would a compressional wave,
calculated to work between nucleons in a nucleus, work in a single
proton hydrogen atom?
It will not, and on this forum our main concern is energetic hydrogen
reactions, and the
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:22:16
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
I suspect it's an issue where the apple sauce product review board has
simply not cared to ask its customers what they think about the shape
of the antiquated jars. I think they need an uppity young
I've pushed to put peanut butter in caulking gun cartridges for a while ( so
I could just squirt some into my mouth ) ( via emails to e.g. Jif ), but to
no avail :-(
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 2:52 PM
To:
Your brain on culture
The burgeoning field of cultural neuroscience is finding that culture
influences
brain development, and perhaps vice versa.
By Beth Azar
http://www.apa.org/monitor/2010/11/neuroscience.aspx
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:32:16 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Well, here is a direct quote from recent post a few months back (in which he
claims that there is a fundamental speed of sound in the nucleus, no
kidding):
These ideas are large. I should get a Noble prize,
16 matches
Mail list logo
