Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy presentation

2012-04-09 Thread Alain Sepeda
just to quote Larsen in his cite: - He criticize the ide that He4 is trapped, and an ad hoc excuse - he claims that some transmutation cycle produce much more coherent energry by He4 than DD fusion you can fin their reasoning in

Re: [Vo]:Nuclear drones

2012-04-09 Thread mixent
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 04 Apr 2012 15:41:41 -0400: Hi, [snip] What on earth are they thinking of powering these with? Plutonium? - Jed I thought they were considering a small but conventional reactor, similar to those used in nuclear subs. Because it's in an unmanned drone,

Re: [Vo]:Nuclear drones

2012-04-09 Thread Alain Sepeda
good analysis, but I think it won't pass the common sense barrier. look like those many marketing advertizing, to justify more funding... crazy that deciders accept those crazy ideas while refusing LENR... maybe because LENr is frightening because credible solution, while nuclear drone are just

Re: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy making waves

2012-04-09 Thread Jojo Jaro
Chung sez: IF this system is able to remove the three usual weaknesses of the majority of the pre-Rossi LENR systems i.e. low intensity, bad reproducibility and short duration. Peter Systems ok. Weakness only by operator. Easy. 10 Plate Heat Exchanger SS304 Copper Brazed 7.5 x 2.9 from

[Vo]:finally some good news

2012-04-09 Thread fznidarsic
Subject: Good news http://tribune-democrat.com/local/x101441047/Natural-gas-glut-looms

Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy presentation

2012-04-09 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 01:30 AM 4/9/2012, Alain Sepeda wrote: just to quote Larsen in his cite: - He criticize the ide that He4 is trapped, and an ad hoc excuse - he claims that some transmutation cycle produce much more coherent energry by He4 than DD fusion you can fin their reasoning in

Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy presentation

2012-04-09 Thread pagnucco
Abd, First, thanks for putting in so much effort into your review. I think most of us find the reaction pathways bewildering complicated. I am perplexed, though, that you say that McKubre's experiments provide no evidence for W-L theory, since he is now a technical advisor for Brillouin

[Vo]:Mallove murder trial begins

2012-04-09 Thread Jed Rothwell
See: http://www.norwichbulletin.com/news/x221044190/Trial-set-to-begin-in-Mallove-slaying#axzz1rZEqp9d8

Re: [Vo]:Mallove murder trial begins

2012-04-09 Thread Guenter Wildgruber
Von: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 20:00 Montag, 9.April 2012 Betreff: [Vo]:Mallove murder trial begins See: http://www.norwichbulletin.com/news/x221044190/Trial-set-to-begin-in-Mallove-slaying#axzz1rZEqp9d8 Yeah.

[Vo]:OT: Happiness Summit

2012-04-09 Thread Harry Veeder
With nods to Buddha and Aristotle, a United Nations expert panel on Monday called for all countries to measure and track the happiness of their people, and to adopt a “a very different model of humanity” oriented toward subjective wellbeing rather than per capita gross national product.

Re: [Vo]:Mallove murder trial begins

2012-04-09 Thread Guenter Wildgruber
Von:Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 20:00 Montag, 9.April 2012 Betreff: [Vo]:Mallove murder trial begins   See:   http://www.norwichbulletin.com/news/x221044190/Trial-set-to-begin-in-Mallove-slaying#axzz1rZEqp9d8 just to elaborate on this a bit: We have a

Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy presentation

2012-04-09 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 12:25 PM 4/9/2012, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Do you communicate with McKubre and have any update on his theory? - especially wrt Brillouin's LENR hypothesis. The idea that McKubre has a theory, or that this is, in some way, important, is Krivit propaganda. He is an experimentalist.

Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy presentation

2012-04-09 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 12:25 PM 4/9/2012, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Abd, First, thanks for putting in so much effort into your review. I think most of us find the reaction pathways bewildering complicated. I am perplexed, though, that you say that McKubre's experiments provide no evidence for W-L theory,

Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy presentation

2012-04-09 Thread Jed Rothwell
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote: Interpretations of work can involve theory. McKubre is an electrochemist, not a nuclear physicist. While his opinions about theory may not exactly be irrelevant, neither should we expect them to be authoritative . . . As far as I know, McKubre

Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy presentation

2012-04-09 Thread Guenter Wildgruber
Von: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com Gesendet: 0:35 Dienstag, 10.April 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy presentation In my view, the job of developing cold fusion theory will involve materials

Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy presentation

2012-04-09 Thread Guenter Wildgruber
consider this: Hagelstein -an intermediate figure at MIT- does a borderline experiment with a couple of students. He proves something, ie something akin to 'cold fusion'. The result looks convincing, but does not enter the MIT establishment, because they would loose funding in hot fusion, which

Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy presentation

2012-04-09 Thread mixent
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:51:25 -0500: Hi, At 12:31 AM 4/8/2012, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:34:24 -0500: Hi, [snip] Widom-Larsen theory completely fails to explain the actual experimental

Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy presentation

2012-04-09 Thread mixent
In reply to Alain Sepeda's message of Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:30:42 +0200: Hi, [snip] just to quote Larsen in his cite: - He criticize the ide that He4 is trapped, and an ad hoc excuse - he claims that some transmutation cycle produce much more coherent energry by He4 than DD fusion you can fin their

Re: [Vo]:New Lattice Energy presentation

2012-04-09 Thread Eric Walker
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote: W-L theory allows for a farrago of proposed reactions, so one can pick and choose for a large and complex field, to find a reaction that might explain a particular result. And that the required reaction series