When two like charged participles are cooper paired together, do they still
have charge? They may not. Their charge may be delocalized and exist at a
location that is far distant from the spin part of them.
If they both had the same charge, how could they stick together?
A quasi-neutron…
Lewis Larsen, weak force LENR for Gold from Tungsten, 2012.05.19
slides 33-39 of 66, text only: Rich Murray 2012.05.24
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-lenr-transmutation-networks-can-produce-goldmay-19-2012
33. Commercializing a next-generation source of valuable
According to infinite energy magazine Defkalion Green Technologies and
Brillouin Energy have agreed to participate.
so we'll be seeing some new younger faces too.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
See:
http://iccf17.org/sub04_03.php
I gotta say it .
Hello group,
This is via ecatnews [1] / NASA Langley RC YouTube Channel [2]
Joe Zawodny informally speaks again about his group's recent
developments on LENR and future applications/implications. Widom-Larsen
theory cited, new very small scale test device shown.
This video appears to have
From: Moab
According to infinite energy magazine Defkalion Green Technologies
and Brillouin Energy have agreed to participate.
so we'll be seeing some new younger faces too.
I gather Rossi was either not invited or he declined to participate. Too
bad.
Too bad. It would have been interesting
See:
http://www.energikatalysatorn.se/
It seems to be a bit retarded, in the best sense
of this word.
Peter
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
See:
http://www.energikatalysatorn.se/
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
As I reported here, I sent Srinivasan a short message asking him to clarify
his thoughts about the Ni-H experiments at BARC and SRI. I wrote to him:
I was talking to Jones Beene about you said regarding your work at SRI. You
tried to replicate Mills. As I recall, you said you got some
Good grief. I spelled his name wrong in the heading. How embarrassing!
Anyway, here is the memo text. Let me try to append the whole thing.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
*Two-Balance Method of Faraday Efficiency Measurement with External Open
Cell Calorimetry for Identifying Origin of
This may be too open-ended and nebulous to present at this juncture - but
the evidence for small amounts of tritium in Ni-H LERN is substantial.
Thanks to Ed Storms and Jed Rothwell from bringing this detail clearly into
focus recently - because for one overriding consideration- given the rarity
I should credit Eric Walker's persistence, as well, in this mini tritium
revival - especially in digging up old papers from the early nineties where
the isotope is mentioned.
There are many other papers as well, some of them not available on
LENR/CANR. Fusion Technology is a good resource for
As another way to over come the coloumb barrier, I vaguely recall a
paper proposing that the range of the strong force may reach further
under some circumstances.
Harry
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Tritium is so extremely rare and unexpected, and its detection is so
certain
and reliable - that even its occasional appearance overrides EVERY AND ALL
of the skeptics objections which are mostly all associated with low
reproducibility.
I have often
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
After I describe the people at BARC and Jalbert, the discussion ends. I do
not recall any instances in which the skeptics responded. However, in other
venues and discussions they continue to say they do not believe the
I wrote:
I have often said this, but the skeptics disagree. They find reasons to
doubt the results.
There is a legitimate reason to doubt results with heavy water. Some heavy
water does have tritium in it to start with. This can be concentrated by
electrolysis. Experts such as Storms know
On 2012-05-24 12:57, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
Here's a related blog post by Dennis Bushnell (Chief Scientist, NASA
Langley Research Center). I don't know exactly how recent this is, but
I've never seen it linked before:
The Page Info states -
Modified: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 3:36:53 PM
I am not sure if that means it was uploaded at that time.
On 2012-05-24 12:57, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
Here's a related blog post by Dennis Bushnell (Chief Scientist, NASA
Langley Research Center). I don't know
The device shown in the video is depicted in slides 20,21,22 of Zawodny's pdf
presentation that NET obtained through the FOI request.
The experiment is significant because it elegantly allows the direct
observation of cold fusion without complicated calorimetry or controls. The
Zawodny slides
To avoid being laughed at and eventually fired, the people at NASA need a
politically correct theory to legitimate their interest in cold fusion.
High energy and plasma physics and its conceptual spawn, the standard model
all say that the coulomb barrier is inviolate.
So how can NASA embrace
I guess this is also Frank Znidarsic contention:
If the range of the strong nuclear force increased beyond the
electrostatic potential barrier a nucleon would feel the nuclear force
before it was repelled by the electrostatic force. Under this
situation nucleons would pass under the electrostatic
And, if the calculations in the paper -
ESTIMATION OF ENERGY RELEASE IN PROTON-21 EXPERIMENTS
http://www.proton21.com.ua/publ/Proton21_Energy_EN.pdf
- are correct, the process is exothermic.
So it may not have energy costs if the energy generated can be recaptured.
Alan J Fletcher on Tue, 22
This concept is most interesting. I would assume that the energy required to
overcome the electrostatic barrier must still be supplied and it would most
likely be stolen from the strong force presentations. The nucleus mass deficit
is substantially larger when a neutron is absorbed (Ni58 +
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
I should credit Eric Walker's persistence, as well, in this mini tritium
revival - especially in digging up old papers from the early nineties
where
the isotope is mentioned.
I failed to give Ed Storms credit for the
23 matches
Mail list logo
