Thanks, Axil
LeClair is making testable claims. He certainly sounds sincere.
Hopefully, some labs will try to replicate his results soon.
If it turns out his results are correct, I wonder whether the observed
neutron and gamma emissions will be as large as expected given the
reported levels of
Because the idea of the ether they were after (i.e. were trying to
confirm) was completely mechanicistic. They never expected light would
sink or shorten into the direction of movement. That is,
*longitudinally*.
Corolarium 1: The Universe is not mechanicistic. Light, at least,
completely
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/09/rossi-on-the-safety-of-cop-6/
Admittedly this is from Mr Unreliable, so caveat emptor, but if there are
neutrons being released under some conditions why not all the time?
Neutrons would be really bad news for LENR. Very penetrating and hard to
shield - and
Guys,
We are surrounded by dark matter which absorbs light and energy and matter
Massive dark matter particles are orbiting through the earth and creating
many/most of our high energy events on Earth including intense weather
patterns, seismic and volcanic activity.
Believe it or not I think
It's possible that Rossie is seeing more neutrons than he has let on, even
in his smaller devices running at low COP. Weighing against this is the
fact that many of the LENR researchers have also seen neutrons, but only at
very low levels -- Ed Storms provides a single, short paragraph in chapter
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 9:57 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys,
We are surrounded by dark matter which absorbs light and energy and matter
Massive dark matter particles are orbiting through the earth and creating
many/most of our high energy events on Earth including intense
Hats off to Nick !
Nick Reiter has generously compiled and placed his recent positive thermal
results with cobalt-hydrogen in a Word doc at the bottom of the documents
list here:
https://sites.google.com/site/ohiotoio/documents
Note that this is not high-budget work, and is not yet verified
On 09/22/2012 09:04 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 09/22/2012 08:39 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 09/22/2012 08:29 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Because the idea of the ether they were after (i.e. were trying to
confirm) was completely mechanicistic. They never expected light
would sink or shorten into the
The cobalt loaded beads remind me of Mars.
Way to go Avalon Biker!
I have a pre-tirement house near a Borax source :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borax_Lake_Site. It was the major US source
before those dang mule trains took over.
It would be a real doozie if I could just scrape up some salts, hook up the
nickels and demonstrate CF// an anomalous heat effect.
What's the quickest way to do some basic calorimetry ... ?
a) Stir the boron and measure the temperature inside and outside the container.
b) Compare the measured VA and the delta-T of the solution.
c) Use an oscilloscope to check that there are no spikes/abnormal waveforms in
the input power.
There are two kinds of ethers.
First: the classical ether is extremely stiff medium where light waves are
propagating, similarly like sound waves are propagating in a water. It must
be hugely stiff, because the speed of light is depended on the stiffness
and the speed of light is quite
Opening at the Chicago International Film Festival October 16th:
http://www.thebelieversmovie.com/
I would say just measure the temperature of an open beaker containing the
boron solution.
What you're probably looking after is sudden heat increase due to a kind of
LENR effect.
If such an effect is occurring you should see different slope of the
Temp/time graph you should compose.
Such sudden
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote:
If you want an extra reference you could use a second identical beaker and
use only graphite rods in the same solution.
Graphite rods are not necessarily a suitable control. It is possible that
graphite will be
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 11:58:00 AM
If you want an extra reference you could use a second identical beaker
and use only graphite rods in the same solution.
Graphite rods are not necessarily a suitable control. It is possible
that graphite
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I think that all obvious controls should be tested : nickel, copper ...
Chuck reported some.
But graphite is probably a good base.
Sure -- any possible and interesting control should be attempted, and
graphite is definitely
This is one of the better writeups that I've seen. It's encouraging to see
some simple experiments that, if successful, will demonstrate a clear
effect.
Nick Reiter should consult a paper written by Hioki, et al., which touches
upon work they did monitoring heat evolution in a zeolite [1].
A lesson for all the naysayers, wind bags, journalist wan-a-bees, hop heads, dreamers and procastinators:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4VJG8-9izQfeature=player_embedded#t=156sHow about cleaning up Vortex to allow easier selection of intellectional discourse and experimental attempts from the
Actually, he includes the Hioki paper in his references on page 16.
I doubt if a sealed reactor with 10-15 grams of material, most of it already
oxidized, could show continuous thermal gain over a 100 hour run on chemical
energy. Did you notice the low mass of KH?
In fact, if it were
Yes, Puppy,Like Jed Rothwell in Vortex search shows 15574 matches or Jojo with 834 never showing any results for his "research" while soliciting donations on Vertex. Perhaps they became Rich raising worms or lizzards.Meow
This sort of message I would expect from american smokers of shit.
Thank You for displaying that to the world at large.
Guenter
Von: Puppy Dog d...@inbox.lv
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 22:26 Samstag, 22.September 2012
Betreff:
Mental Abnormalities?
**
Re: [Vo]:Show me the beef
Guenter Wildgruber
Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:43:04 -0700
This sort of message I would expect from american smokers of shit.
Thank You for displaying that to the world at large.
Guenter
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 8:23:24 AM
First, the Neutrons were observed occasionally, and only at COP=200.
There's another discussion of COP at :
Steven N. Karels
September 17th, 2012 at 8:34 AM
I am less optimistic that neutron production is only occurring under
special circumstances and not all the time - would seem to me to require
more good luck than is likely (what was McKubre's line about conservation
of miracles?)
I believe low energy neutrons are relatively hard to detect -
In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:45:38 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/09/rossi-on-the-safety-of-cop-6/
IOW at very high COP levels he actually had a few nuclear reactions. ;)
...so at lower COP levels his Hydrinos don't shrink far enough to result in a
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-03/09/230-percent-efficient-leds
Craig
No, from the article:
However, while MIT's diode puts out more than twice as much energy in
photons as it's fed in electrons, it doesn't violate the conservation of
energy because it appears to draw in heat energy from its surroundings
instead. When it gets more than 100 percent
Well, nothing is overunity, not even cold fusion, but there are a lot of
places which could use cheap lighting and air conditioning.
Craig
On 09/22/2012 09:30 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
No, from the article:
However, while MIT's diode puts out more than twice as much energy
in photons as it's
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-03/09/230-percent-efficient-leds
LOL! The Reiter Effect showed a similar effect:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_coefficient
as have other LENR products.
I saw that information on Rossi's journal. I am inclined to believe that he
does not have anything resembling linear control otherwise he could raise the
COP above 6 with little concern. Does anyone in vortex actually believe that
the LENR activity goes up linearly with drive power? It would
Would it be possible to detect that modest energy neutrons were being emitted
by just monitoring the local gamma radiation from transmuted materials?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Sep 22, 2012 7:12
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 11:05:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:JCMNS Vols 6 to 9
JCMNS Volumes 6 to 9 published
Goodness. I am behind. I forgot to add them to LENR-CANR.org.
Should be *I*CMNS. Wiki says they changed ICCF to International Conference
Ordinarily it takes energy to fall below ambient temperature, so it
must stealing energy from the electrical input that would have been
used for photon production. Unless it is violating the laws of
thermodynamics, it must become less efficient at producing photons as
it cools.
harry
On Sat,
From: David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 6:43:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi: Neutrons? : COP200, Linearity
I saw that information on Rossi's journal. I am inclined to believe
that he does not have anything resembling linear control otherwise he
could raise
I like this device. It has interesting possibilities. Actually, energy is
being radiated into space by all warm collections of gas molecules in the form
of infrared. You could place a tiny low power heater within one of these
clouds and claim that the power being radiated as heat is many
(Should this be considered another miracle of cold fusion?)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Sep 22, 2012 9:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:JCMNS Vols 6 to 9
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday,
Jouni,
It is a neo Lorentzian ether that I posit not a classical
stiff medium that ignores an extra dimensional intersection of ether with
our plane. This posit also makes the speed of light and our system of
metrics into a blind man's cane used because we are trapped in 3d
I have run many simulations of an ECAT type device where temperature is the
controlling parameter and find that the only way to get a decent COP (2) is to
use positive feedback. In this mode the device is thermally running away to
generate effective gain and must be reversed just before total
All,
For those interested, I have posted an article with my comments on one of
the most awesome energy displays ever in the US in 1811-1812. A truly
unworldly event.
New Madrid as Seen Through Dark Sunglasses.
http://darkmattersalot.com
PetaPetaPetaPeta Joules of Cold Fusion Energy? released
I've got to set me up a Sites Effect experiment. But it has to be portable (ie
outside).
What's the total power to bring it to hot status (8 hrs?)
I see two options for power :
6V Lantern Battery
A 12V Car Starter kit Normal mode seems to have a current limiter, boost mode
bypasses it.
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
I propose either silicon or magnesium as suitable controls.
Ummm Burning or molten magnesium metal reacts violently with water.
http://www.astro.virginia.edu/class/oconnell/astr121/comte.html
On the subject of stars, all investigations which are not ultimately
reducible to simple visual observations are ... necessarily denied to
us. While we can conceive of the possibility of determining their
shapes, their sizes, and
Please ignore the example of bad spelling in the subject line.
harry
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.astro.virginia.edu/class/oconnell/astr121/comte.html
On the subject of stars, all investigations which are not ultimately
reducible to
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Ummm Burning or molten magnesium metal reacts violently with water.
Ha! That's right.
There's also reason to think platinum would be a suitable control in an H2
gas or light water experiment.
Eric
Based on comments in this thread you should be prepared to run for
considerably more than 8 hours. Give yourself at least a day and then you
should be prepared to run for a while if you want to make sure you're
observing anything interesting, so call it 48 hours.
Again based on comments in the
This is most interesting in light of the totality of past experiments in
LENR which are believable going back twenty years.
There seems to be excellent evidence for long-term COP of over one but less
than two, often written off as measurement error; but far less reliability
for experiments
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
This is most interesting in light of the totality of past experiments in
LENR which are “believable” going back twenty years.
** **
There seems to be excellent evidence for long-term COP of over one but
less than two . . .
The term COP has no
I would be concerned about the cost of platinum. Stainless steel might work
since it is un reactive. I am using an old stainless spoon as my electrode
attached to the positive supply terminal and it has been working for a number
of hours without getting fouled too badly. This is allowing me
Didn't Celani measure an initial gamma burst in Rossi's 2001 demo?
Robert Lynn wrote:
I am less optimistic that neutron production is only occurring under
special circumstances and not all the time - would seem to me to require
more good luck than is likely (what was McKubre's line about
51 matches
Mail list logo
