Perhaps we should ignore USA and look for a solution in other countries.
2013/2/3 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
We have to focus...on what?
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
there is an initiative
http://lenr-cities.com/
based on business factory method.
If I understand well the idea is that when there is an innovation, the
usual behavior of incumbent is to lock the situation so tha market don't
change.
However best results need changing of the structure of the
Hello Dave,
Your tool is powerful! Did you make also the calibration and exercises with
the EU cell? They have reported about ~6W excess heat when direct current
applied. The cell reports ~2.5W excess heat with an indirect heating.
US cells have been disappointing up to now. But EU cell shows
Greetings,
As with any expected senior level resignation, a short-list of candidates
already exists, plus a list of outliers who have been recommended by respected
people outside the administration. The outgoing Secretary may also have made a
recommendation or two.
The first step is to
I have concentrated upon the US cells so far. I looked at the calibration
information at an earlier time and decided that it was not well enough defined
for the EU cell. Once that decision was made, I kept working toward improving
the program one major step at a time with US data until it
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps we should ignore USA and look for a solution in other countries.
I agree. With the oil in North Dakota and all the natural gas, the US
will be slow to develop a leaner heinie.
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that's what I'm talking about:
http://www.duke-energy.com/news/releases/2013012301.asp
http://www.sandia.gov/ess/docs/pr_conferences/2011/3_Ratnayake_Notrees.pdf
Okay, the first article says it has 36 MW of capacity and it costs . . .
$44
Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's what's known:
* CO2 is increasing -- pretty much in a linear fashion.
* CO2 is a greenhouse gas. But CO2 is an extremely small percentage of
the total atmosphere; something like .039%. It's also not a very strong
greenhouse gas. Water vapor is
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
The reason is both political and based on the very slow response of the
earth system to any change man might make.
This makes no sense to me. The earth system is responding to CO2. Suppose
we quickly remove the CO2 from the atmosphere, with a
I just took a quick look at the calibration conditions for the EU cell and am
not convinced that it is recent and quiet enough to allow my program to
accurately estimate the performance. If they decide to perform a careful test
run such as the recent one for the USA cell, then perhaps that
Dave,
The room temperature of the EU cell environment isn't constant as it is for
the US cell. This variation might as well also contribute to excite the
excess heat to occur.
Problem with US cell is that, in my opinion, they put too much current on
the active wire which is then fried. But
Lawry, I agree such a statement is required and I have created many
variations. Such a statement is only effective when it is targeted to
a particular audience. Obviously, a Congressman requires a different
approach compared to an educated scientist. Consequently, a variety
of statements
The number one rule for Before its news is to consider the source...
LaRouche is a documented nutcase. and the article is worthless without
details. The only case LaRouche may be referring to is the NLRB recess
appointments that were a href=
Swedish TV program on cold fusion and the Ecat with english subtitles.
I think this first aired in the fall of 2012. Translation by Hampus Ericsson.
Essen and Kullander appear and say they are still convinced that the
ecat produced excess
heat. Ekstrom is still convinced it was a trick.
Harry
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Swedish TV program on cold fusion and the Ecat with english subtitles.
I think this first aired in the fall of 2012. Translation by Hampus Ericsson.
Essen and Kullander appear and say they are still convinced that the
Do you have a link to it?
Craig
On 02/03/2013 01:38 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Swedish TV program on cold fusion and the Ecat with english subtitles.
I think this first aired in the fall of 2012. Translation by Hampus Ericsson.
Essen and Kullander appear and say they are still convinced that
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Brad Lowe ecatbuil...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a fascinating look at a new surveillance technology.. which
reportedly uses 368 cellphone camera sensors focused on the ground via
four image-stabilized telescopic lenses.
With that, a drone flying at 6km can
On Feb. 15, a week from Friday - a decent sized asteroid will come extremely
close to Earth... within the orbit of many satellites, it would seem ...
NASA sez: we've never seen an object this big get so close to Earth.
How close exactly? 17,200 miles.
I would like to think that the Pleiades
Let's face it, they are still trying to track Santa Claus and believe
comets are balls of snow and ice that can pass through the sun's atmosphere
like Comet Lovejoy did and shoot x-rays and sparks millions of miles long.
Will be an interesting year ahead.
Stewart
darkmattersalot.com
On Sun,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwidzVHvbGIfeature=player_embedded
more info in this video.
Cheers:Axil
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
On Feb. 15, a week from Friday - a decent sized asteroid will come
extremely
close to Earth... within the orbit
Here are some interesting links on comet behavior if anyone is interested.
They do not behave like the snowballs I knew and loved growing up in Maine.
1. Plasma radiationhttp://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1993/93JA02532.shtml
2. Gamma
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net\
Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2013 1:08:49 PM\
On Feb. 15, a week from Friday - a decent sized asteroid will come
extremely close to Earth... within the orbit of many satellites
NASA sez: we've never seen an object this big get so close to Earth.
How close
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
asteroid - and determined that in the unlikely event it hit something fairly
large in Earth orbit, the asteroid orbit could not be deflected
substantially enough to be at risk.
If the mass of an orbiting satellite is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_keyhole
The danger is not over.
A *gravitational keyhole* is a tiny region of space where a planet's
gravity would alter the orbit of a passing asteroid such that the asteroid
would collide with that planet on a given future orbital pass.
On Sun, Feb
Incoming massive comets can also pull other gravitational bodies into the
inner solar system along with them
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_keyhole
The danger is not over.
A *gravitational keyhole* is a tiny
Hi,
On 3-2-2013 23:37, ChemE Stewart wrote:
Incoming massive comets can also pull other gravitational bodies into
the inner solar system along with them
It seems to me you are looking for some kind of doomsday scenario and I
don't think that's going to happen.
Cheer up (Luke), you are
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 3 Feb 2013 14:14:27 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
asteroid - and determined that in the unlikely event it hit something fairly
large in Earth orbit, the asteroid orbit could not be deflected
Right, about 5% light matter and 95% dark matter/energy. I am not a
doomsday guy, I just think we should realize what we are experiencing. We
have too many phenomenons IMHO. Of course ignorance is bliss and the
dinosaurs probably though those big fireballs looked cool.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at
28 matches
Mail list logo
