This remind me the controversial concept of incommensurability of Thomas
Kuhn, that I conforms practically.
As many show them, and even more deeply that what Kuhn says, a paradigm is
admitted nearly only when it is industrial ...
the other case, similar, is when laymen can have access to so clear
Garwin is a scientist and by training tends to be very cautious. The excuses
that he used to doubt the excess power measurement of course are lame, but we
should note that he included them. This is the type of behavior one might
expect from someone who just witnessed a magic trick that he is
North American Palladium is one of two palladium producers in North America,
and its stock has dropped below $1 share. It is currently unprofitable, but
moving in the right direction - having sold its gold mines at top dollar
before gold tanked.
This article has a lot of good info on palladium
Rossi made a statement on his Journal recently that seemed puzzling at the
time. He mentioned that he was turning on the drive power for 1/4 of the time
and allowing the device to drift in the self sustaining mode for the other 3/4.
He further told us that he was working of having the ECAT
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/02/isaac-asimov-2014_n_4530785.html
What do you see?
Frank Z
Jones,
This sounds risky.
What industries will benefit most if energy prices plummet?
-- for whatever reason.
The shipping companies seem like a good bet, but they have already shot
up in the stock markets.
What about transportation, battery, electric motor, rare earth metals, etc.?
-- LP
E-cat World has lately been reporting that two companies are connected with
Rossi: Cherokee Investments, Industrial Heat LLC.
Someone told me by e-mail that Rossi has an assistant name Fulvio Fabiani
who is connected with these companies.
I don't know anything about this. I am just now catching
Here is the article that connects Rossi, Fabiani and someone named Darden
in the Research Triangle in North Carolina:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/01/examining-the-rossi-industrial-heat-cherokee-connection/
Darden is evidently a billionaire with connections to Bain Capital.
I don't think TomDarden's a billionaire, Jed. It just so happens that there
is a link to the World's Billionaires above his profile page on Forbes.
He's currently the CEO of Cherokee Investment Partners in Raleigh, NC. He
worked at Bain Capital in the 1980s.
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Jed
I am beginning to suspect that Rossi may have figured out what his reaction
is really doing. The core principle of the nanoplasmonic reaction involves
the process of how the micro and nano particles come together into
aggregations to form the nuclear active sites. These sites are the spaces
Frank Acland ecatwo...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think TomDarden's a billionaire, Jed.
I'll bet he is. He is the CEO of a private investment firm that raised $1.4
billion on 2006. The money must have made a profit by now. He is loaded,
anyway. With connections everywhere.
- Jed
It looks like China will lead the way in LENR.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/01/stron ...
rom-china/http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/01/strong-confirmation-of-cherokees-backing-of-the-e-cat-from-china/
I have been concerned that the billion dollar per year political slush fund
funded by the
Jed, while your descriptions might explain Garwin's behavior toward
LENR. I think another explanation is more likely. Garwin and the other
high level skeptics are not stupid and they are not ignorant. They
know that CF has a potential to disrupt both the hot fusion program as
well as the
Hello Ed,
Although your take on the subject might be the correct one, I find it difficult
to imagine that anyone with integrity would act in that manner. My suspicion
is that these guys actually believe exactly what they have stated. All of
their training in physics makes LENR appear
Hi Dave,
I also would rather not believe people in such influential positions
would be so cynical and self-serving to reject CF based only on their
self interest. On the other hand, I have a hard time believing they
could be so stupid to ignore the evidence. I'm sure their training in
The lesson of Benabou model is between both your visions.
Groupthink : Collective Delusions In Organizations and Markets(Paper IOM
2012-07 by Roland
Benabou)http://www.princeton.edu/~rbenabou/papers/Groupthink%20IOM%202012_07_02%20BW.pdf
in fact those guy are intelligent, they know they are
*Upton Beall Sinclair, Jr* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upton_Sinclair: *It
is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends
upon his not understanding it!*
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
The lesson of Benabou model is
See:
https://news.newenergytimes.net/2014/01/03/u-s-department-of-energy-invites-submission-of-lenr-proposals/
Recently we had a short discussion concerning objects being ejected from
planetary systems such as ours. I was toying with the Planets program that I
stumbled upon when testing Linux. That program is very interesting and it is
easy to fiddle away hours of time just observing how planets
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Although your take on the subject might be the correct one, I find it
difficult to imagine that anyone with integrity would act in that manner.
The world is full of people without integrity. In academia, high mighty
professors engage in all kinds of
*New Energy Times has just learned that, on Sept. 27, 2013, the Department
of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) quietly
announced a funding opportunity for low-energy nuclear reaction (LENR)
research, among other areas.*
Hey, that was my 59th birthday. How nice!
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Jed, while your descriptions might explain Garwin's behavior toward LENR. I
think another explanation is more likely. Garwin and the other high level
skeptics are not stupid and they are not ignorant.
Yes. That leaves disingenuous, as I said.
The
I hope you are wrong in this case Jed. To intentionally delay the introduction
of LENR products and the wonders that they will release is criminal! Many
lives hang in the balance. We may harbor ill will towards Garwin and Lewis,
but I find it difficult to believe that they are of that low
Here is the URL for the full document -
ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY ENERGY (ARPA-E)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
OPEN INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT IN ENERGY-RELATED APPLIED SCIENCE (OPEN IDEAS)
Announcement Type: Initial Announcement
Funding Opportunity No. DE-FOA-0001002
CFDA Number 81.135
Its hard to understand why these guys didn't just meet up individually and
feel out their concerns. I know that at some point the normative pressures
are so great that if anyone so much as whispers something in private that
might be construed as defection in from the ranks, that it would
Hi Dave,
I tend to concur with your suspicions that the effect is most likely real,
this based on my own computations of simple planetary orbits. I have used
both single precision and double precision in my simulations. Rounding off
errors appeared to be negligible. As far as my own personal
Happby delayed B'Day Terry,
Don't let your cat's mistake one of your peg legs for a scratching post. ;-)
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newvortex/
Since Three Mile Island and bolstered by the other periodic nuclear based
disasters, the nuclear industry (aka the cult of the neutron) has been
increasingly embattled by the green technologies and a lack of political
support. They hate the greens and the greens hate them. More broadly, the
It is a little hard to find the actual reference. It says low-energy
nuclear reactions on page 7, Figure 3, item 3.6.
Here is the URL for the full document -
ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY – ENERGY (ARPA-E)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
OPEN INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT IN ENERGY-RELATED APPLIED
Steven,
A few years back I also wrote a program that handled a central large star like
object with another orbiting it. I had a plan to eventually include a small
number of other objects that were to interact gravitationally, but never found
the time to complete the project. I was curious
Jed,
I think the phrase low-energy nuclear reactions must have been inspired
by current claims. On p.5, under the PROGRAM OVERVIEW, it states -
This announcement is purposely broad in scope to encourage the
submission of the most innovative, out-of-the-box ideas in energy
technology. Since
The safest course is to take Garwin and Lewis and the others at their word
and to limit consideration to what was said and written. One can have
one's suspicions about their genuine motives, but this is only speculation
in the final analysis.
Remember that Pons's lawyer sent a stiff letter to
32 matches
Mail list logo
