I wrote:
In another sense, it would be no more overunity than a fission reactor,
since the energy would be coming from the conversion of mass via nuclear
reactions.
The obvious objection to the above is that the release of energy always
involves a mass deficit. The idea was that cold fusion
James, it's just so tiring.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uai7M4RpoLU
Let them continue to hallucinate;
their typing is the only thing keeping the economy going
while a new infrastructure is being built right under their noses!
On 10/17/14, 3:37 PM, James Bowery wrote:
/. just posted a
As am I, Ruby. This instance was a little different as I posted the first
comment to the article so it was in a position to really drive some of the
pseudo-skeptics over the edge and it looks like it succeeded with Bruce
Perens in a significant way.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Ruby
Of course not. When suckers make bets like this with me I generally at
least demand treasury rates but Bruce was so spontaneous I didn't want to
spoil it.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Inflation adjusted?
2014-10-17 23:03 GMT-03:00 James Bowery
I have been looking for just such a bet for a long time.
I put my mouth where my money is at intrade:
http://bb.intrade.com/intradeForum/posts/list/15/2239.page
At first the controversy indicated 10:1 or 20:1 odds but no one would bite
until I started buying at 3:1 odds.
When intrade went bust,
There are at least 5-10 different kinds of old and new stirling engines
available with 30-40% efficiency using 7-800°C input temperatures. They
range from 100W-30kW in capacity. So no problem doing a self-driven system
with LENR COP of 3.2
Qenergy probably easiest to get a hold of (around 33%,
Bob,
How do you know that the tube was first coated with enriched 62Ni as you
claim here below?
The observers could notice the presence of Ni on the inside wall by just
looking inside the eCat before the dummy run.
Arnaud
_
For all we know, the inside of the reaction tube was
Yes, but then you need to convert the physical energy into electrical which
will cause some extra loss.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
There are at least 5-10 different kinds of old and new stirling engines
available with 30-40% efficiency
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:
James, it's just so tiring.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uai7M4RpoLU
Let them continue to hallucinate;
their typing is the only thing keeping the economy going
while a new infrastructure is being built right under their noses!
Eric--
I found the following item which may or may represent fact:
https://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091129063508AAEROpC
A copy of this link follows:
The deuteron has a binding energy of 2.2245 +/- 0.0002 MeV and has no
stable excited states.
It has an angular momentum of
Dear Friends,
I have just published this:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/10/victory-or-defeat-all-combinations.html
It is intended for a weekend lecture, a bit relaxed after so much Rossi
Report confrontationalism, therefore it has a dosis of cultural ballast.
However decisively more
Eric--
One additional comment on the D excited state question.
Suppose in stead of one D you realize a pair of D's with their spin vectors
pointing in opposite directions in a coherent system like one may have in the
middle of a body centered cubic (BCC) cell of a Pd metal lattice or a Ni
Harry etal--
With all the discussion of the accuracy of the camera heat determination, why
is there not a reference to the thermocouple that was used in the test to
monitor the internal temperature. It should have been a good check and in
effect calibration of the camera at the higher
Bob,
I have cherry-picked three major “spin facts” from this compendium which
indicate that if one wants to apply a nano-magnetism or spin-coupling
modality to LENR, it is highly preferable to use deuterium, as opposed to
hydrogen. That may be why Mizuno chose the deuterium-nickel combination. All
Arnaud,
He is Robert, not Bob and he never claimed to know but he is correct that
the overwhelming probability is that pure Ni62 was added into the test
sample in some way.
Rossi may not have done it, but he had the opportunity and the motive, and
the fact is clear: that the sample was
Jones--
Was there any indication that the Mizuno experiments used quadrupole
electric or magnetic inputs?
I was not aware of this, if it happened.
Also keep in mind that D is a Bose particle (as is 4HE) and can form a BEC
or a duplex BEC with two different Bose particles. This may be a
From: Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
MFMP Plans E-Cat Replication Attempt Starting in 6 Days, Design Posted
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/10/17/mfmp-plan-e-cat-replication-attempt-starting-in-6-days-post-design/
The reaction tube was only a 4mm diameter hole and as much a 28 cm deep.
In addition, there was the plug for this end in the center of which the
thermocouple was glued. The thermocouple must be present as part of the
CCI/MicroFusion 3-phase control system. So, even while it was not clear
from
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
Was there any indication that the Mizuno experiments used quadrupole
electric or magnetic inputs? I was not aware of this, if it happened.
This is an interesting point, and the Mizuno experiment may not have been
optimized. Hopefully the next
I wrote:
Unfortunately I don't have any other details and don't know of a particular
experiment to refer to. Here is the quote from a textbook I recently
finished reading: ...
It was late last night, and the paragraph I found and quoted pertained to
deuterium, not 4He, which you were asking
One of the things I noted about the new hotCat is that it seemed to not be
affected by the air that would have been present after the powder was
loaded. There was no means to pull a vacuum to clean out the air. In
thinking about the use and effects of the LiAlH4, it occurred to me that
this
Dear Alan,
You will be surprised when you will see what they want to do.
They are skilled smart and seem to be adept in research strategy and system
thinking.
Peter
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
*From: *Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
MFMP Plans E-Cat
Alan Fletcher wrote:
*
* What they could usefully do is construct a new dummy as close to Rossi's
design as possible, and power it not only by the spiral resistors used by
Rossi, but also by resistors strung through the center, to see what electrical
power is needed replicate the
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Once the Li is a thin alloy film on the Ni particle surfaces which are
catalyzed to produce a LENR reaction, the Li may then be a participant in
the LENR in condensed matter form as opposed to being a participant in
The most interesting detail, which will not be resolved for several days, is
whether the “dummy” reactor was secretly loaded with active material – and
delivered that way. In which case, it would have shown gain in a calibration
run (which was not performed). Or … whether the assumptions about
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
(And I can't resist noting that Levi et al should have done this).
Yes. Even if you you're worried about running the E-Cat without fuel at
high temperatures, a resistance heater running at the same power should be
fine. That
This is an excellent idea and I assume that the MFMP guys will perform the
experiment. Their results will be quite revealing.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Oct 18, 2014 11:33 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:new
Jones-
I do not know of data on high temperature BEC's of particles of high mass.
Y. Kims theory for the reaction of Bose particles, including duplex
compinations of different Bose particles, may be of some importance. I have
not studied his theory in depth, but the fact that he seems to
Bob--
I assumed that Rossi included a getter for O. However you may be correct about
the use of the alumina substance to act as a getter.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: Bob Higgins
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2014 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:
Why would you want inflation adjusted? It works in your favor :)
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:16 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course not. When suckers make bets like this with me I generally at
least demand treasury rates but Bruce was so spontaneous I didn't want to
spoil
Eric
The Li may still be in a vapor form and the Ni in a nano size solid state form,
both nano particles and Li atoms circulating as a hot mixed substance in the
reactor. The Li reacts one atom at a time with the Ni lattice to form new
species. The temperature is practically uniform because
Dave and Eric-
I think you assume running the heating coils at a power to produce the
operating temperature without the added heat source of the LENR would be
possible. The heating wires may not have been able to get to the necessary
power level whether they are resistance or inductive
Brushless generators can be designed to do 97% efficiency. Not a
significant loss.
On 18 October 2014 17:17, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but then you need to convert the physical energy into electrical
which will cause some extra loss.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:01 PM,
It was not too long ago as marked by the painfully slow march of science
that Steven* Chu* won himself a Nobel Prize in Physics in 1997 for his
ground breaking research at Bell Labs in cooling and trapping of atoms with
laser light. His fame in this supreme accomplishment afforded him the
As someone who has first hand experience working with micro-scale carbonyl
Ni powder, and treating these powders in a thermochemical reactor, I can
tell you that what you are saying about the nickel particles is 100%
wrong. Even these 4-10 micron scale nickel particles will sinter into a
porous
From: Robert Lynn
Brushless generators can be designed to do 97% efficiency. Not a significant
loss.
John Berry wrote:
Yes, but then you need to convert the physical energy into electrical which
will cause some extra loss.
And one the least costly ways to get high efficiency (I
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
I do not know of data on high temperature BEC's of particles of high mass.
Y. Kims theory for the reaction of Bose particles, including duplex
compinations of different Bose particles, may be of some importance. I have
not studied his theory in
Taking the report at face value, the hotcat displays several of the standard
LENR miracles ..
Some evidence of nuclear reactions (though incomplete and a tiny sample: Li, Ni
-- but no H, He ... examined)
No radiation outside an alumina cylinder (though there may be a steel tube
inside)
No
You are right Bob. It might not be possible to perform the experiment in a
manner that we would prefer. I do believe that they should make every attempt
to reach that goal within reason. If not successful, I would like to see a
report describing the obstacles that they encountered. There
The reason I posted the message here with the title To Arms is that I
perceived this to be a unique opportunity to goad the acolytes of
pseudo-skepticism into laying it on the line.
I was right.
You see /. is one of, if not the most read news blog by techies. Fusion is
one of a few ultimate
Rossi's position might have been advanced through the addition of Ni62
isotope in that this could be claimed as proof of transmutation and
associated nuclear activity. But transmutation was also proved using the
increase in the Lithium 6 isotope.
Rossi could not have spiked the ash with Lithium 6
And yet, particle 1 which showed Ni62 transmutation also shower that the
tubercle nano-surface was still in place after days of 1400C operation. Any
ideas?
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
As someone who has first hand experience working with
From: Axil
* Rossi could not have spiked the ash with Lithium 6 since access to
that isotope is restricted to the same level of access as plutonium with
both being proliferation control items.
Not so. Rossi could buy 6Li in kilograms if he so desired. Recent press
Meltdown might not be such a major concern with the latest design. If Rossi
and allies have optimized the geometry in such a manner as to extract heat
energy from the device faster than the core can produce it then thermal run
away should not occur. That suggests that some finite operating
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
So either the temperature measurement is wrong, or we have another miracle,
that seems to take place within the entire interior of the hotcat.
I think part of our difficulty is that one hesitates to take the report at
face
The left side (in Figure 1) 45-50mm of the reactor are much cooler than the
heated core between the insulated supports. This end near the thermocouple
plug probably never exceeded 700C. Particles that ended up there did not
undergo as much sintering. As I recall the Lugano test particle was
The persistence of those tubercles which should have melted at 1000C is
impossible to explain after days of 1400C reactor surface temperatures.
Heat management including production and flow inside the Rossi reactor is
not yet understandable, a mystery.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 2:06 PM, David
There was a directly observable miracle that showed unmelted nano structure
on the surface of those nickel micro particles that should have melted at
1000C and yet where photographed after days of 1400C reactor operating
temperatures. Those temperature differences are TOO LARGE to be due to poor
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
And one the least costly ways to get high efficiency (I have heard) is by
way of one of your “down under” washing machine motors – rewired as a
generator…
http://www.yourgreendream.com/diy_fisher_paykel.php
Paul and I
This idea contributes the belief that the nickel particles are the source
of heat production. What you are saying is that the particles caused heat
to be generated somewhere else in the reactor, not in or near the nickel
particles. How can the surface of the reactor sustain a temperature of
1420C
Do you believe that the Papp engine is a real over unity device. It ran is
self sustain mode in a third party dyno test and even won a patent of the
year award from the US patent office. The moral to this story, if people do
not want to believe, they just won't.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 2:33 PM,
it is highly preferable to use deuterium, as opposed to hydrogen.
I disagree.
Deuterium has a non zero spin whereas hydrogen has a zero spin which is
required in low powered LENR reactions.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Bob,
I have cherry-picked
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
And one the least costly ways to get high efficiency (I have heard) is by
way of one of your “down under” washing machine motors – rewired as a
generator…
Paul and I tried one of these on the you-know-what. It even puts out
three phases and can
From: Axil
it is highly preferable to use deuterium, as opposed to hydrogen.
I disagree.
Deuterium has a non zero spin whereas hydrogen has a zero spin which is
required in low powered LENR reactions.
Says who? What is your evidence?
Ni61 is non reactive as stated by DGT and confirmed by Mizuno as presented
in Cook's !CCF-18 presentation
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Axil
it is highly preferable to use deuterium, as opposed to hydrogen.
I disagree.
Deuterium has
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
There was a directly observable miracle that showed unmelted nano structure
on the surface of those nickel micro particles that should have melted at
1000C and yet where photographed after days of 1400C reactor operating
See
https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/36817/SimulationNuclearTransmutationPresentation.pdf?sequence=2
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Ni61 is non reactive as stated by DGT and confirmed by Mizuno as presented
in Cook's !CCF-18
So what, that’s not general evidence?
Even if true, it relates to nickel, and not to hydrogen/deuterium.
Everything since 1989 in LENR points to deuterium being as active if not
more than hydrogen.
From: Axil Axil
* Ni61 is non reactive as stated by DGT and confirmed by
Bob--
Thanks for that clarification about the melting of small Ni particles. Are
there any compounds or alloys of Ni that would not melt or sinter below say
1100 C? Since Rossi says he does not use Ni nano particles the fuel may be
something else containing Ni that could be exposed to the
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
By the time the IH reactor is operating above 1000C, there are no nickel
nanoparticles or nano-features of any kind left - they are all melted into
larger agglomerations.
Is it possible that the micro-scale features
Bob Higgins: Even these 4-10 micron scale nickel particles will sinter
into a porous mass by heating at 500-700C.
Rossi uses micro particles in the 2 to 10 micron range. The nano
structured surface tubercles coating will melt at lower temperatures that
the sintering of the entire particle. This
No...This surface nanostructure is a result of the processing of the
carbonyl Ni powder precursor which is long gone in the resultant pure
nickel particle uses by Rossi.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Bob Higgins
I can't believe that the independent science team could ever make a mistake
that bad: measuring a reactor temperature that as actually at 700C as being
1400C.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
With that kind of test bed, it should be possible to close the loop with
anything over COP 1.2 electric-to-electric, like the Bedini, Newman and
other claims. Even if all four losses were considered (motor, generator,
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
With that kind of test bed, it should be possible to close the loop with
anything over COP 1.2 electric-to-electric, like the Bedini, Newman and
other claims. Even if all four losses were considered (motor, generator,
transformer, inverter) this
The melting miracle may put into question some irrefutable logic about
reactor melt down.
It is assumed by all what are not judged to be nuts that when the reactor
get up to 2000C during meltdown, the nickel particles are long since melted
and something else is causing increasing temperature
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't believe that the independent science team could ever make a mistake
that bad: measuring a reactor temperature that as actually at 700C as being
1400C.
It is difficult to believe. And yet, people do make large mistakes at
times. If the photos in Fig.
I wrote:
I can't believe that the independent science team could ever make a
mistake that bad: measuring a reactor temperature that as actually at 700C
as being 1400C.
It is difficult to believe. And yet, people do make large mistakes at
times.
See p. 11 here for examples of large
There is an assumption that the Ni is pure Ni. This may not be the case.
There may be a substrate of a high temperature ceramic--Ti-N or Ti-C or
something else with the Ni bonded to the surface of the substrate.
The thermocouple reading at operation is unknown to me. It may have indicated
Axil--
Your question:
How can the surface of the reactor sustain a temperature of 1420C if
the nickel particles are cooler that that temperature.
Answer---The energy is generated by the particles is radiant energy and all is
absorbed by the alumina near the inner surface with none being
I would disagree with the spins reported by Axil for D and a Proton. D is +1
and the Proton is +1/2 in non excited states or ground states. The neutron
also has a +1/2 spin. The proton and neutron spins seem to add to make up the
+1 spin of the D.
Bob
- Original Message -
From:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
With that kind of test bed, it should be possible to close the loop with
anything over COP 1.2 electric-to-electric, like the Bedini, Newman and
other claims. Even if all
their theory get more and more crazy...
this guys ridicule 9/11 truthers but they behave the same.
2014-10-18 0:37 GMT+02:00 James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com:
/. just posted a story debunking cold fusion
Have at it, men and Ruby!
*There is good reason to believe that magnetism is the prime mover in LENR.
Under this speculative paradigm, it is interesting to consider the options
and consequences of this conjecture. In such a paradigm, any technology
that is friendly to magnetism would be good for LENR, and conversely, a
this seems a mystery but maybe it is the key.
as far as I understand your discussion, it seems impossible Ni particles
surface structure stay stable even at 1000C... it won't be liquid, but will
be aggregated too easily...
when something works and there is something like a problem, maybe it is
Axil--
Take a look at the Norman Cook discussion that you just posted as to the
depletion of the various isotopes of Ni in LENR testing that Cook evaluates.
IT INCLUDES DEPLETION OF ODD NUCLEON ISOTOPES WITH NET SPIN (NI-59 WITH -3/2)
AS WELL AS EVEN NUCLEON ISOTOPES WITH 0 SPIN. ONLY
What I am saying is that the reaction site it not hotter than its
environs. Think about it like a microwave oven (only x-rays instead of
microwaves). The oven walls don't initially get hot. The food inside gets
hot from the microwave absorbtion and the IR from the food then heats up
the walls
if particles cannot survive, maybe they don't .
[image: Image]
Some particles come out of the reactor after a month of 1400C temperatures
just as they when in, that is with tubercles. They are structurally intact.
Go figure!!!
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Alain Sepeda
You are close to my thinking. However,what the micro particles produce is
not x-rays but coherent magnetism at extreme strength.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
What I am saying is that the reaction site it not hotter than its
environs. Think about
I am sure that there may be a Ni-X alloy that melts at higher temperature
than pure Ni. The field is wide open. There is just not enough good
concrete data or a theory to say what works and what doesn't. It appears
that Rossi has something that works, but this Lugano report provides, once
Ni59 is not stable. I don't see it mentioned in the Cook report. You have a
case for Pd105 but this non zero spin conjecture is not a hard cast
rule. Non zero spin is just unfavorable in the LENR reaction based on the
strength of the magnetic field producing the reaction. Non zero spin just
The SEI assay on page 45 of the report shows a PURE nickel particle with
tubercles that have been unaffected by heat having survived 32 days of
destructive temperatures up to 1400C.
Lithium 6 is a reaction ash. Lithium 7 is a secret sauce (SS) alkali
metal additive, The older versions of Rossi's
Another remote possibility should be mentioned, if real gain is found in this
device… and that would be this: the basis of gain could be only SPP – surface
plasmon polaritons. This species may be gainful in itself as it condenses.
Electrons would be lost to the Dirac sea via SPP, for instance
I like it.
SPPs only live for a few picoseconds. They are half light and half
electron. SPPs need to be vigorously pumped. If fusion feeds SPP creation
we should see an increase in electrons as well as heat. As Rossi reported,
he sees a large production of electrostatic charge in his reactor,
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
The isotopic analyses are a little amazing, and, as far as I can tell, do
not give indications of a gradient effect in the 6Li and 62Ni species.
appendix 3
measured abundance in ash sample
6Li - 92.1%
7Li - 7.9%
From: Axil
I like it.
SPPs only live for a few picoseconds. They are half light and half electron.
SPPs need to be vigorously pumped. If fusion feeds SPP creation we should see
an increase in electrons as well as heat.
Since this reactor depends on continuous electrical input to
This line of reasoning leads me to wonder if the mini explosions that some
think are occurring are able to sputter the fuel. In this scenario, the molten
mass is continually torn apart into small blobs that then cool into odd shapes
and sizes.
Is anything of this nature even remotely
It is unlikely that the SAME micro-scale features would re-appear - at
least in Rossi's historical carbonyl process Ni particles. The particle
shape with the high external surface area is a unique outcome from
precipitatation from a highly volatile liquid. As the temperature rises to
500C,
Fusion must be involved because there is all kinds of transmutations taking
place. If the energy came from the vacuum, then no ash would be generated
and the reactor will not need a fuel recharge to function.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Axil
See my previous reply to Eric. Bare Ni will sinter together into a low
porosity bulk at 500C. Coating the Ni particles with the Fe2O3 nanopowder
before they ever get hot prevents large scale sintering. The tubercles
that Rossi described during growth are micron-scale features. These are
not
Maybe this low temperature sintering particle behavior is the reason why
Rossi takes so much time to start the E-Cat going. He needs to get the
magic going before the nickel particles are destroyed by heat,
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
It is
*These do not melt like nanoscale features.*
What is the temperature at which these surface features are destroyed?
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
See my previous reply to Eric. Bare Ni will sinter together into a low
porosity bulk at 500C.
Magnetism is even less likely the cause at the temperature of the hotCat.
It is one thing to ascribe coherent effects at temperatures of 400C (being
improbable there), but by the time you get over 1000C, it is hard to
imagine being able to maintain any kind of condensed matter alignment that
could
BTW – the beauty of an SPP hypothesis is that - not only is it falsifiable,
but the proof or disproof will happen in about 6 days if everything goes
well.
If the MFMP puts together a “dummy” reactor - and it is even slightly
gainful, then of course the mystery will be solved.
Tubercles is a nebulous description. You could call those features
tubercles, but I do not. They are not tubes at all. I have seen tubes
(hence my belief that I saw tubercles in my powder and they were at
larger scale (pictures are in my paper). Only Rossi can say which he
intended as
The nickel particle cannot be rebuilt. But there is a good chance that he
lithium can form nanoparticles aggregations that do the same SPP creation
function as the nickel particles. I call this clumping dynamic NAE
production because these clumps of nanoparticles are continuously made and
How do SPPs convey the heat away from the NAE so that the nanoscale is NOT
the hottest spot? SPPs normally attenuate at very small scale, and the
attenuation is electromagnetic absorption of the lossy plasmon waveguide.
If the NAE is the hottest spot in the reactor, then there could never be a
Dave and Axil,
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't believe that the independent science team could ever make a
mistake that bad: measuring a reactor temperature that as actually at 700C
as being 1400C.
Ordinarily a surface at 1400C should glow
No radioactive isotopes production is another LENR miracle.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
BTW – the beauty of an SPP hypothesis is that - not only is it falsifiable,
but the proof or disproof will happen in about 6 days if everything goes
well.
If
Where are the neutrons?
Must be a mistake.
Where is the white glow?
Must be another mistake.
Harry
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
