Greetings Vortex-L
Higggs and the Gone Particle:
http://www.techtimes.com/articles/19802/20141108/shocking-cern-may-not-have-discovered-elusive-higgs-boson-particle-after-all.htm
Ad astra,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
Doylestown PA
LOL. That brings me quite a bit of satisfaction actually...what a useful
expenditure of the public coffers...
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings Vortex-L
Higggs and the Gone Particle:
The original Cobraf link: http://www.cobraf.com/forum/immagini/R_123569754_1.pdf
It shows an NRG Sec filing outlining the fact that one of its subsidiaries is
European Generating s.a.r.l. The rest of the Cobraf link describes the linkage
between Rossi's patent application, IPH and NRG.
The
That's two Nobels that should be returned.
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
That's two Nobels that should be returned.
Three if you count Obama's Peace prize. :-)
It has been my suspicion all along that these guys jumped to a conclusion much
too quickly. I thing of someone finding a 16 pound weight and announcing that
they have found a bowling ball. Until the true interactions of a particle are
established no one can be confident in what they find.
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 1:07 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It has been my suspicion all along that these guys jumped to a conclusion
much too quickly. I thing of someone finding a 16 pound weight and
announcing that they have found a bowling ball. Until the true
interactions
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 10:07 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It has been my suspicion all along that these guys jumped to a conclusion
much too quickly.
I share your skepticism about the discovery of the Higgs boson. But I'm
also skeptical about the claim of this team that there
I suppose that a careful review of previous Noble prize awards would reveal
that many were in error according to present understanding of the sciences.
Would a longer wait time actually help? My thoughts are that it would indeed
be better to allow the dust to settle for several years while
I agree with much of what you are saying Eric. The other group is just as
likely to be wrong in their interpretation as well since so few particles have
been seen. How is it possible for anyone to state with confidence that a newly
found particle of a certain mass has anything at all to do
Greetings Vortex-L:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22429944.000-ghost-universes-kill-schrodingers-quantum-cat.html#.VF_20zTF-So
Ron Kita, Chiralex
See David French's analysis of Andrea Rossi's new patent application:
http://coldfusionnow.org/andrea-rossi-2nd-us-patent-application-published-6-nov-2014-at-uspto/
David French concludes:
How can the best mode requirement be met when a catalyst is required and
that catalyst is not disclosed?
That's a fascinating expression: coincidence of wants. But in this
instance, it goes against Occham's Razor. These players at one time were
willing to try something together in 2003, but 10 years later it means
nothing.
Think about your own allies from 10 years ago and how things have changed.
13 matches
Mail list logo
