John, most of the “time” dilation would be accompanied by Lorentzian dilation
of equally large magnitude [contraction is indicative of spatial displacement
on what remains the “time” axis from our perspective]– just as a “deep enough
gravity well” can create relativistic effects for objects at
Dear Friends,
See please:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/12/daily-shared-lenr-recipes-december-18.html
Starting from an inspiring paper of Russ George i got exactly nowhere.
But it does not matter because it was an opportunity for sweet CF memories
in contrast with some bitter realities
The natural light-element ratio of equal protons and neutron numbers is
prevented in beryllium by the extreme instability of 8Be toward alpha decay,
which is favored due to the extremely tight binding of 4He nuclei. The
half-life for the decay of 8Be is only 6.7(17)×10−17 seconds. (from
This morning I witnessed what might be considered a monumental demonstration
which undoubtedly will cause realization of what harnessing a zero point
potential implies. In what I have described as a communist electrical circuit
by theory when time is equally divided in three portions of
Some of that went over my head, at least with a single reading.
But the Pound-Rebka experiment shows that such red and blue shifting from
light entering and leaving a gravitationally time dilated area does occur,
this means that any object that began to fall into a black hole would not
only see
John,
You make a good point that the guy approaching the black hole would see
everything located outside of its gravitational influence as being sped up
immensely. Also, it makes sense that he would be fried by the incoming
radiation from the orbiting sun if he is moving at a moderate
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/13/science/space/a-black-hole-mystery-wrapped-in-a-firewall-paradox.html?pagewanted=all_r=0
A Black Hole Mystery Wrapped in a Firewall Paradox
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:11 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
John,
You make a good point that the guy
More...
Black Hole Information Paradox 2. Stretched Complementarity
In this post, which continues Black Hole Paradox 1. Susskind vs. Hawking
http://www.unitaryflow.com/2013/09/bh-paradox-1-susskind-vs-hawking.html,
I will explain my reasons for not accepting the black hole complementarity
No, he wouldn't need to be moving at a significant velocity of the speed of
light at immense gravity creates extreme time dilation.
But you do bring up a good point about the danger of moving at superluminal
velocities, IF not for the fact that time dilation from moving near light
speed is a
9 matches
Mail list logo
