Jack, the very best of luck.
*Fleischmann*/*Pons* detected RF when their cell was in operation. I
suspect that RF is a reaction byproduct in the same way as heat.
Do you plan to check for R product by the LENR reaction?. A RF detecter can
be had at a reasonable cost
There have a number of comments about images from the Parkhomov/Rossi
reactors which appear to show dark wires in front of a brightly glowing
background.
Yet . we know that these wires should be strongly incandescent (unless the
photo was taken immediately after the current was turned off).
Jack:
Thanks for exiting the peanut gallery and jumping into the frying pan!
I might be able to donate a thing or two to the effort…
-mark iverson
From: Jack Cole [mailto:jcol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 6:44 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Jack Cole's report
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Hydrogen in the DDL is greatly reduced in diameter so that it cannot be
contained by the ceramic - and the isomer atoms would diffuse through the
alumina (which is a dielectric) as soon as they are formed.
These hydrinos
Dave and Gigi--
In the overall evaluation of the energy balance, please note that the 6L pump
uses .25amps x 115 VAC power = 28.75 watts. This is in accordance with a 2005
drawing of the pump from the vendor that I forwarded to Dave a day or so ago.
(The actual pump used in the test may have
Dear Gigi,
You wrote:
The pump absorbs from the grid a given amount of electrical power: for the
sake of simplicity let's say 12 W. According to the data sheet 3 W are
transformed into mechanical work and, eventually, transformed into heat inside
the water. The other 9 W are directly
In prompto of your argument I try to get a discussion about especially the
nature of charge and that of a charge at a orbitsphere.
Maybe you'll find the argument interessting, have fun!
Hi,
Many people have fundamental issues with accepting that the law of the atom
is following a non smooth
rule
Excuse me Jed,
but I think that is very simple for you to say that I do not understand
calorimetry if you reply to a question that I did not ask.
The refrigerator example is quite evident, but is unfit to our situation,
by various causes. The main one is that there you have an abrupt *change *of
Jones--
I observed the the same thing in the picture provided by McKubre in his current
evaluation of the test in Infinite Energy #119. An observation reported by
Storms via McKubre's report questions the report in that the temperature
measured at the center by the T/C does not seem to
If a superconductive state is manifest in the hearer wire that is not
adjusted for by the power supply, the heater will not produce the constant
heat from electrical resistance as expected. This could be the reason why
there is oscillation in the heat produced in the reactor in several alumina
More
I bet that one of the functions that Rossi has implemented in his heater
control box is to keep the power constant in the face of the onset of
superconductivity in his heater. The TPR2 testers did not report trouble
keeping power flow to the heater constant. If superconductivity is
Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com wrote:
The refrigerator example is quite evident, but is unfit to our situation,
by various causes. The main one is that there you have an abrupt *change *of
air temperature, while in the 18h test the air temperature is falling at a
modest rate of 0,36 °C/h
LENR/CNT activity in Russia is very vivid.
Therefore I have iscussed with one of its leaders
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/01/short-interview-with-yu-n-bazhutov.html
I hope to learn more. later
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Dear Gigi,
I have begun to analyze your report and find something that does not seem
logical according to my understanding of heat flow. On your figure A2 I see
that you have overlaid your simulation results upon Jed's figure. The
correspondence between the curves is remarkable and you
Thanks Jones. Good suggestion on the Nichrome. If this pans out, that
would be a good thing to try for enhancing the reaction.
I don't have any way to estimate the hydrogen loss. I can only tell when
it is occurring.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Thanks Jed. I plan to do some follow-up experiments to rule out
alternative explanations.
Explained here:
http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/2015/01/14/experimental-plans-replication/
I have started the calibration run to see if it can be replicated. I
should have results in a day or two.
On
Congrats to Jack – and gain is gain, so do not fret over low COP as it will
improve.
Can you estimate the rate of hydrogen loss?
I would love to see Kanthal windings compared against Nichrome 80. Not
expensive here and the ohms/ft. are listed.
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40
Dear Jed,
in your report you write:
*The temperature rose for 1.5 hours until it stabilized 0.6°Cabove room
temperature (Fig. 19.) It stabilized because heat losses equal the power
from thepump. In other words, with low input power after 1.5 hours, this
system acts as an
Michel Vandenberghe published a short message about this weekend conference
in Oxford.
I relayed it.
as you can read I think that it is a turn in the battle, as the presence of
an Airbus official (plus journalist and academic people) may sadly have
more importance than any calorimetry.
*I missed the simulation for some reason. Where can I find that? Sorry if
I overlooked it.*
In a previous message I gave you a couple of links. In the second link, in
the *APPENDIX *you will find the simulation
*The fact that you measure 4.5 watts versus a specification of 3 watts
maximum
Good time to inject again the 2005 Jan Naudts paper re relativistic hydrogen
which if correct means the redundant state is a relativistic perspective
induced by surrounding Casimir geometry that restricts the vacuum density.
Locally there is no redundant state just Lorentzian contraction and
http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/2015/01/13/hot-cat-replication-attempt/
Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com wrote:
I could say that this is false but I will be fair and I will say that this
is not true. From the missing file (Mizuno's data) we get the following
situation for the difference between water and ambient temperature
(4h 2.5°C) (5h 2.9°C) (6h 3.1°C) (7h
I searched a little in the literature about these hydrinos, They seams to
originate from the wave operator, people have found them in simple
wave equations. Both Maxwell's equations, the Dirac equation etc contains
the wave operator. What is interesting is that if you assume that the
proton have a
I searched a little in the litterature about thise hydrinos, They seams
to originate from the wave operatores, people have found them in simple
wave equations. Both Maxwell's equations, the Dirac equation etc contains
it. What is interesting is that if you assume that the proton have a spatial
Gigi,
I just recalculated the combined thermal time constants and now I believe you
have them right. I must have performed that calculation 5 times and kept
getting a different answer! The thermal K's that you used are inverted from
the normal R's(resistors) that I always use when
According to Jed the pump is never turned off. So this is the real fact:
there is no excess heat, only the pump.
Plus the calorimeter external and internal time constant
(capacity+resistance)
We can overlaid the experimental figures only by using the calorimeter
parameter and an estimated pump
I may have answered my own question below. The drop in ambient acts much like
a negative signal as I have proposed before. Eventually the delta will become
zero for both signals.
Forget the first question and concentrate upon the next one.
I notice that in both curves that you use to
Jed,
I think you should study heat transfer. I suggest you the book by Incropera
et al.
In one comment you say that the loss is equal to the pump power and the
system stay constant; in the following comment you do not remember this and
start speaking about the Newton's law of cooling. You
Gigi,
I have another issue that you might be able to discuss. You made two
independent simulations of the behavior of the Dewar temperature and reactor
body over time. In one case the pump was working and in the other if had
failed. I took the values that you calculated for the thermal
More about this:
http://coldfusionnow.org/qa-with-jack-cole-on-new-hot-cat-replication-experiment-completion/
Newton's law of cooling
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/differential-equations/first-order-differential-equations/modeling-with-differential-equations/v/newtons-law-of-cooling
Harry
Ok, we need some time to perform the full set of simulations. But please do
not take for sure that the pump only test had exactly the same
configuration than the test run had. We will present them as soon as we are
confident that all the problems have been settled.
2015-01-13 22:18 GMT+01:00
Take your time Gigi, we want to get to the facts. I am very impressed by the
simulations that you have shown and how well they match the curves made by Jed.
Now, we need to verify that things add up as they should by combining thermal
resistance and capacities of two parts to get to the
34 matches
Mail list logo
