[Vo]:Matter to energy, and back

2015-07-27 Thread Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Does there exist any kind of natural phenomenon we currently know of that might be capable of (under specific conditions) transforming from matter into energy and then back into matter in a cyclically controlled fashion - presumably with the aid of an advanced form of 21st Century technology?

[Vo]:about bridge building in LENR, infoo

2015-07-27 Thread Peter Gluck
Dear Readers, I am very happy that you have returned to me. Today I speak about metaphoric bridge building in LENR. But things are going still too slowly. See please the INFO,i.a. Yuri Bazhutov does great things. My best wishes to you all. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania

RE: [Vo]:Matter to energy, and back

2015-07-27 Thread Jones Beene
To me, Hotson’s view is also correct, and another way of saying the same thing… possibly more intuitive, since it recognizes that epo field can “materialize” when excited, but is always a background condition. From: Bob Higgins According to Hotson, pair production is not matter creation, it

Re: [Vo]:accusations, fragmenttaion and some info

2015-07-27 Thread Axil Axil
The last article was directly related to you and Larson. Like Konrad Zuse, both Yiannis and Peter were among the first to came up with a radical nanoplasmonic concepts for LENR. Both you and John were marginalized within the LENR community. Then as time moves forward, people like Larson use your

RE: [Vo]:Matter to energy, and back

2015-07-27 Thread Jones Beene
Steven, It's called pair production and is well-known but requires high energy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production .photons converted to matter and vice-versa. .kinda like, you know . dilithium crystals. J From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson Does there exist any kind of

Re: [Vo]:Matter to energy, and back

2015-07-27 Thread Bob Higgins
According to Hotson, pair production is not matter creation, it is only ionizing an epo (electron - positron pair in a DDL-like orbit). To me, this is far more plausible than matter creation. On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: Steven, It’s called “pair

Re: [Vo]:accusations, fragmenttaion and some info

2015-07-27 Thread Peter Gluck
Thank you very much but you have a too good opinion about me. As regarding Larsen he actually has attacked you and the whole thing waqs awfully clumsy- i see this goes to Vortex and I have to censor my wording. I have not much hopes that Widom and Srivastava will start discussing with you and

RE: [Vo]:Matter to energy, and back

2015-07-27 Thread Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Bob, Jones, Thanks for humoring me. I am not surprised that discussing energy/matter conversion techniques in 21st century terms is, how should I put it, a debatable matter. Here's where I'm going with my previous request: If practical M/E conversion technology could eventually be

[Vo]:Is the new MFMP test flawed from the start?

2015-07-27 Thread Jones Beene
I wasn't aware of photon multiplication as a potential hindrance to IR testing (in the context of thermometry) until recently, but it is a hot topic in Optics journals these days. Was it even mentioned wrt Lugano? Doubt it. For instance - with quantum dots as the receptor, 7 new visible photons

RE: [Vo]:Matter to energy, and back

2015-07-27 Thread Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Hauke, I think your design concept is pretty much the same concept as mine. I would also speculate that using hydrogen atoms, or perhaps a hydrogen plasma stream, would help simplify what engineering might be involved. If there is a cover... then yes, it would be my suspicion that an upward

RE: [Vo]:Matter to energy, and back

2015-07-27 Thread Hauke Hein
Hi Steven I read your idea with the cannonball between two reflekting mirrors. I had an idea similar but with lets say hydrogen atoms reflectet between two vertical parallel walls at escape velocity.I think those particals would follow a parabolic path climbing between the vertical walls.I wonder

RE: [Vo]:Matter to energy, and back

2015-07-27 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
Jones wrote: It's called pair production and is well-known but requires high energy. Correction to the statement, . requires high energy. ONLY IF DEALING WITH THE INTERACTING ELEMENTS IN A NON-RESONANT MANNER. If you were using a process involving resonant principles, then much lower energy

[Vo]:Scientists Confirm 'Impossible' EM Drive Propulsion

2015-07-27 Thread Axil Axil
Scientists Confirm 'Impossible' EM Drive Propulsion https://hacked.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Xenon_hall_thruster-750x500.jpg Later today, July 27, German scientists will present new experimental results on the controversial, impossible EM Drive, at the American Institute for Aeronautics and

RE: [Vo]:Matter to energy, and back

2015-07-27 Thread Hauke Hein
Hi Steven I was thinking that maybe hydrogen at low pressure and moderate temperature has a molecular rms velocity of close to escape velocity. If one would calculate the weight of the hydrogen inside a hermetically closed container that has the right pressure and temperature for rms escape

Re: [Vo]:accusations, fragmenttaion and some info

2015-07-27 Thread Peter Gluck
Thanks, very interesting but not strongly connected to LENR. Peter On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: The strange case of Konrad Zuse Konrad Zuse was a German civil engineer, inventor and computer pioneer. His greatest achievement was the world's first